Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Humeral shaft fractures

  • Trauma (MJ Gardner, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management of humeral shaft fractures has historically been largely conservative. A significant body of literature, dating back to the 1970s, has shown that functional bracing may achieve greater than 90 % union rates and acceptable functional outcomes. More recently, however, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implant options, less tolerance for acceptable deformity and functional deficits, and less patience with conservative management, many treating orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly likely to consider surgical intervention. This article reviews the current recommendations for treatment of humeral shaft fractures, including both nonoperative and operative intervention. It also discusses the current thinking and operative trends in humeral shaft fracture fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Cole PA, Wijdicks CA. The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23:437–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Templeman DC, Sims SA. Humeral shaft fractures. In: Stannard JP, Schmidt AH, Kregor PJ, editors. Surgical treatment of orthopaedic trauma. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2007. p. 263–84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, et al. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1469–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;802:249–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brorson S. Management of fractures of the humerus in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome: an historical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1907–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E, et al. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:596–601.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA, et al. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:607–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, et al. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:478–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutgers M, Ring D. Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:597–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. • Denard Jr A, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, et al. Outcomes of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33:552. Recent retrospective study comparing functional bracing with compression plating. Higher rates of nonunions and malunions with functional bracing and no significant difference in complications from operative intervention.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Idoine 3rd JD, French BG, Opalek JM, et al. Plating of acute humeral diaphyseal fractures through an anterior approach in multiple trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, et al. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:833–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zlotolow DA, Catalano 3rd LW, Barron OA, et al. Surgical exposures of the humerus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:754–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klenerman L. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48:105–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C. The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fjalestad T, Stromsoe K, Salvesen P, et al. Functional results of braced humeral diaphyseal fractures: why do 38 % lose external rotation of the shoulder? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:281–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Toivanen JA, Nieminen J, Laine HJ, et al. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop. 2005;29:10–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:283–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, et al. Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerwin M, Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJ. Alternative operative exposures of the posterior aspect of the humeral diaphysis with reference to the radial nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1690–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mills WJ, Hanel DP, Smith DG. Lateral approach to the humeral shaft: an alternative approach for fracture treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:81–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. • Singisetti K, Ambedkar M. Nailing versus plating in humeral shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2010;34:571–6. Prospective evaluation of twenty patients with antegrade nails and sixteen patients with dynamic compression plates over a three year period and used functional scoring criteria. Paper noted that treatment should be individualized to patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. • Suzuki T, Hak DJ, Stahel PF, et al. Safety and efficacy of conversion from external fixation to plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:414–9. Seventeen patients treated with acute external fixators for severe injury were converted to plate fixation at any average of 6.2 days (range 2–14 days) with good outcomes. Conversion within two weeks is safe and effective.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsh JL, Mahoney CR, Steinbronn D. External fixation of open humerus fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 1999;19:35–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mostafavi HR, Tornetta III P. Open fractures of the humerus treated with external fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;337:187–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zinman C, Norman D, Hamoud K, et al. External fixation for severe open fractures of the humerus caused by missles. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:536–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clement H, Pichler W, Tesch NP, et al. Anatomical basis of the risk of radial nerve injury related to the technique of external fixation applied to the distal humerus. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:221–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, et al. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures – a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, et al. Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:531–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. • Patel R, Neu CP, Curtiss S, et al. Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;5:300–5. 3.5 mm plates were compared to 4.5 mm plates in biomechanical testing in length unstable humeri using similar working lengths and number of fixation points. 4.5 mm plates were stronger and better tolerated crutch weight-bearing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Prasarn ML, Ahn J, Paul O, et al. Dual plating for fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hornicek FJ, Zych GA, Hutson JJ, et al. Salvage of humeral nonunions with onlay bone plate allograft augmentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;386:203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Concha JM, Sandoval A, Streubel RN. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible? Int Orthop. 2010;34:1297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. • Kobayashi M, Watanabe Y, Matsushita T. Early full range of shoulder and elbow motion is possible after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:212–6. Fourteen patients treated by a single surgeon with minimally invasive surgical osteosynthesis (MIPO) demonstrated early recovery of motion of adjacent joints.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, et al. Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:628–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ekholm R, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, et al. Primary radial nerve palsy in patients with acute humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:408–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hughes R, Schneeberger A, An K, et al. Reduction of triceps muscle force after shortening of the distal humerus: a computational model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;6:444–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:407–14.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rommens PM, Kuechle R, Bord T, et al. Humeral nailing revisited. Injury Int J Care Injured. 2008;39:1319–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Noda M, Saegusa Y, Maeda T. Does the location of the entry point affect the reduction of proximal humeral fractures? A cadaveric study. Injury Int J Care Injured. 2011;42:S35–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, et al. Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McKee MD. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, editors. Rockwood and Green’s: fractures in adults. 6th ed. Philadelpha: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1117–59.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tsourvakas S, Alexandropoulos C, Papachristos I, et al. Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nail. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011;95:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Iacobellis C, Agro T, Aldegheri R. Locked antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011. doi:10.1007/s12306-011-0166-z.

  45. Blum J, Rommens PM, Janzing H, et al. Retrograde nailing of humerus shaft fractures with the unreamed humerus nail. An International Multicenter Study. Unfallchirurg. 1998;101:342–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hollister AM, Saulsbery C, Odom JL, et al. New technique for humeral shaft fracture retrograde intramedullary nailing. Tech Hand Surg. 2011;15:138–43.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Heineman DJ, Bhandari M, Nork SE, et al. Treatment of humeral shaft fractures – meta-analysis reupdated. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. • Heineman DJ, Poolman RW, Nork SE, et al. Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:216–23. Meta-analysis of four randomized trials comparing humeral intramedullary nailing to plate fixation. They noted no statistically significant difference in total complications, nonunion, infection, nerve palsy, and reoperation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. • Denes E, Nus S, Sermon A, et al. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:735–42. Forty-two humeral plates were compared to forty-nine nails with no difference noted in fracture union and functional recovery.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Flury MP, Goldhahn J, Holzmann P, et al. Does Weber’s rotation osteotomy induce degenerative joint disease at the shoulder in the long-term. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:735–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC# 3079, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Andre R. Spiguel

  2. University of California – Davis Medical Center, Ellison Ambulatory Care Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 1700, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA

    Robert J. Steffner

Authors
  1. Andre R. Spiguel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Steffner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre R. Spiguel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiguel, A.R., Steffner, R.J. Humeral shaft fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5, 177–183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9125-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9125-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation