Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We treated 93 consecutive patients, average age 53 (16–90) years, with closed humeral shaft fractures applying a functional brace immediately after injury. Seventy-two (77%) fractures healed without problems. There were significantly more consolidation problems in fractures in the proximal third (46% consolidated) compared to those at the middle (81% consolidated) and distal third (86% consolidated) of the shaft. Logistic regression analysis revealed the only predictive factor in respect to successful brace treatment was fracture location. No significant difference was found in respect to healing between different AO-type fractures.

Résumé

Nous avons traité 93 malades consécutifs, d’âge moyen 53 ans (16–90), avec une fracture diaphysaire humérale fermée en utilisant une attelle fonctionnelle immédiatement après le traumatisme. Soixante-douze (77%) fractures ont guéri sans problème. Il y avait plus de difficultés de consolidation dans les fractures du tiers proximal (46% ont consolidé) comparé à celles du tiers moyen (81% ont consolidé) et du tiers distal (86% ont consolidé) de la diaphyse. L’analyse statistique a révélé que le seul facteur prédictif de la réussite du traitement est la localisation de la fracture. Aucune différence significative n’a été trouvée selon les types de la classification AO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bone LB (2001) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Chapman MV, Maddison M (eds) Operative orthopaedics 1. Lippencott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 221

    Google Scholar 

  2. Camden P, Nade S (1992) Fracture bracing of the humerus. Injury 23:245–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ (2000) Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma 14:162–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnley J (1953) The closed treatment of common fractures, 3rd edn. Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen S (1967) Humeral shaft fractures, operative and conservative treatment. Acta Chir Scand 133:455–460

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH (2000) Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:336–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flinkkila T, Hyvonen P, Lakovaara M, Linden T, Ristiniemi T, Hamalainen M (1999) Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. A retrospective study of 126 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70:133–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarvinen M, Kannus P (1997) Injury of an extremity as a risk factor for the development of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:263–276

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klenerman L (1966) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Latta LL, Sarmiento A, Tarr RR (1980) The rationale of functional bracing of fractures. Clin Orthop 146:28–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Link W, Henning F (1988) Indications and osteosynthesis procedures in humeral shaft fractures. Aktuelle Traumatol 18:120–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Niall DM, O’Mahony J, McElwain JP (2004) Plating of humeral shaft fractures—has the pendulum swung back? Injury 35:580–586

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pehlivan O (2002) Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:390–395

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson CM, Bell KM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (1992) Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Experience in Edinburgh over a two-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:558–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:596–601

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarmiento A, Mullis DL, Latta LL, Tarr RR, Alvarez R (1980) A quantitative comparative analysis of fracture healing under the influence of compression plating vs. closed weight-bearing treatment. Clin Orthop 149:232–239

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stannard JP, Harris HW, McGwin G Jr, Volgas DA, Alonso JE (2003) Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures with a locking flexible nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2103–2110

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wallny T, Sagebiel C, Westerman K, Wagner UA, Reimer M (1997) Comparative results of bracing and interlocking nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 21:374–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, Reimer M, Wagner UA (1997) Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma 11:283–287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA, Finnieston AR (1988) Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:607–610

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. K. Toivanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toivanen, J.A.K., Nieminen, J., Laine, HJ. et al. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 29, 10–13 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0612-8

Keywords

Navigation