Skip to main content
Log in

Genomic tools in bioremediation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioremediation is a process that uses microorganisms or their enzymes to remove pollutants from the environment. Generally, bioremediation technologies can be classified as in situ or ex situ. In situ bioremediation involves treating the contaminated material at the site while ex situ involves the removal of the contaminated material to be treated elsewhere. Like so much else in biology, the ease and availability of genomic data has created a new level of understanding this system. Bioremediation capabilities of the microbial population can be analyzed; not only by physiological parameters, but also by the use of genomic tools, and efficient remediation strategies can be planned. PCR and DNA- or oligonucleotide-based microarray technology is a powerful functional genomics tool that allows researchers to view the physiology of a living cell from a comprehensive and dynamic molecular perspective. This paper explores the use of such tools in bioremediation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jorgensen KS (2007) In situ bioremediation. Adv Appl Microbiol 61:285–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grommen R, Verstraete W (2002) Environmental biotechnology: the ongoing quest. J Biotechnol 98:113–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra R, Raj A, Purohit HJ, Kapley A (2007). Characterisation and optimisation of three potential aerobic bacterial strains for kraft lignin degradation from pulp paper waste. Chemosphere 67:839–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raj A, Chandra R, Reddy MMK, Purohit, HJ, Kapley A (2007) Biodegradation of kraft lignin by Bacillus from the sludge of a pulp paper mill. Biodegradation 18:783–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kutty R, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2001) Pseudomonas sp. strain RM2: strain with diverse physiology for aniline and chlorophenol utilization. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ 3:117–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapley A, Thierry B, Purohit HJ (2007b) Eubacterial diversity of activated biomass from a CETP. Res Microbiol 158: 494–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keharia H, Madamwar D (2003) Bioremediation concepts for treatment of dye containing wastewater: a review. Ind J Exp Biol 41:1068–1075

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chhatre SA, Purohit HJ, Shanker R, Chakrabarti T, Khanna P (1996) Bacterial consortia for crude oil spill remediation. Water Sci Technol 34:187–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Chhatre S, Shanker R, Chakrabarti T, Khanna P (1999) Osmotolerance and hydrocarbon degradation by genetically engineered bacterial consortium. Bioresour Technol 67:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra S, Jyoti J, Kuhad RC, Lal B (2001) Evaluation of inoculum addition to stimulate in situ bioremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 1675–1681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava S, Ahmad AH, Thakur IS (2007) Removal of chromium and pentachlorophenol from tannery effluents. Bioresour Technol 98:1128–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Banta G, Kahlon R.S. (2007) Dehalogenation of 4-chlorobenzoic acid by Pseudomonas isolates. Ind J Micorbiol 47: 139–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar SG, Gupta SK, Singh G (2007) Biodegradation of distillery spent wash in anaerobic hybrid reactor. Water Res 41:721–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malhotra S, Sharma P, Kumari H, Singh A, Lal R (2007) Localization of HCH catabolic genes (Lin genes) in Sphigobium indicum B90A. Indian J Microbiol 47: 271–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Narde G, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2004) Isolation and characterization of Citrobacter strain HPC255 for broad range substrate specificity for chlorophenols. Curr Microbiol 48: 419–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasanna D, Venkata MS, Purushotham RB, Sarma PN (2008) Bioremediation of anthracene contaminated soil in bio-slurry phase reactor operated in periodic discontinuous batch mode. J Hazard Mater 153:244–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Qureshi A, Purohit HJ (2002) Isolation of bacterial consortium for degradation of p-nitrophenol from agricultural soil. Annals of Appl Biol 140:159–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raina V, Suar M, Singh A, Prakash O, Dadhwal M, Gupta SK, Dogra C, Lawlor K, Lal S, vander Meer JR, Holliger C, Lal R (2008) Enhanced biodegradation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) in contaminated soils via inoculation with Sphingobium indicum B90A. Biodegradation 19:27–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tripathi P, Srivastava S (2007) Development and characterization of nickel accumulating mutants of Aspergillus nidulans. Indian J Microbiol 47:241–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paul D, Singh R, Jain RK (2006) Chemotaxis of Ralstonia sp. SJ98 towards p-nitrophenol in soil. Environ Microbiol 8: 1797–804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Malik S, Beer M, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2008) The use of molecular techniques to characterize the microbial communities in contaminated soil and water. Environ Int 34:265–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rani A, Porwal S, Sharma R, Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC (2008) Assessment of microbial diversity in effluent treatment plants by culture dependent and culture independent approaches. Bioresour Technol 99:7098–7107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kapley A, Prasad S, Purohit HJ (2007a) Changes in microbial diversity in fed-batch reactor operation with wastewater containing nitroaromatic residues. Bioresour Technol 98: 2479–2484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossello-Mora R, Amann R. (2001) The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:39–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zelles L, Bai QY, Beck T, Beese F (1992) Signature fatty acids in phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides as indicators of microbial biomass and community structure in agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 24:317–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Graham JH, Hodge NC, Morton JB (1995) Fatty acid methyl ester profi les for characterization of glomalean fungi and their endomycorrhizae. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:58–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirk JL, Beaudette LA, Hart M, Moutoglis P, Klironomos JN, Lee H, Trevors JT (2004) Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. J Microbiol Methods 58:169–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Purohit HJ (2003) Biosensors as molecular tools for use in bioremediation. J Cleaner Production 11:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jansson JK, Bjorklofb K, Elvanga AM, Jorgensen KS (2000) Biomarkers for monitoring efficacy of bioremediation by microbial inoculants. Environ Pollut 107:217–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Muyzer G (1999) DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 2: 317–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pandey J, Sood SS, Jain RK (2007) Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis: Characterizing the unseen. Indian J Microbiol 47:90–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh R, Paul D, Jain RK (2006) Biofilms: implications in bioremediation. Trends Microbiol 14:389–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar M, Chaudhary P, Dwivedi M, Kumar R, Paul D, Jain RK, Garg SK, Kumar A (2005) Enhanced biodegradation of beta and delta-hexachlorocyclohexane in the presence of alpha and gamma-isomers in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 39:4005–4011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. DeLong E.F, Pace NR (2001) Environmental diversity of bacteria and archaea. Syst Biol 50:470–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2000) Tracking of phenol degrading genotype. Env Sci Pollut Res 16:89–90

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moharikar A, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2003) Detection of Dioxygenase genes present in various activated sludge. Env Sci Pollut Res 10:373–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sutherland TD, Horne I, Lacey MJ, Harcourt RL, Russell RJ, Oakeshott JG (2000) Enrichment of an endosulfan-degrading mixed bacterial culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 2822–2828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Siddique T, Benedict C, Arshad OM, Frankenberger WT (2003) Enrichment and isolation of endosulfan-degrading microorganisms. J Environ Qual 32:47–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Prakash O, Lal R (2006) Description of Sphingobium fuliginis sp. nov, a phenanthrenedegrading bacterium from a fly ash dumping site, and reclassification of Sphingomonas cloacae as Sphingobium cloacae comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2147–2152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Eickhorst T, Tippkotter R. (2008) Improved detection of soil microorganisms using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and catalyzed reporter deposition (CARDFISH). Soil Biol Biochem (in press) doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.03.024

  42. Martýn M, Gibello A, Lobo C, Nande M, Garbi C, Fajardo C, Barra-Caracciolo A, Grenni P, Martýnez-Inigo MJ (2008) Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization technique to detect simazine-degrading bacteria in soil samples. Chemosphere 71:703–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Radajewski S, Ineson P, Parekh NR, Murrell JC (2000) Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology. Nature 403:646–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kutty R, Purohit HJ, Khanna P (2000) Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas species strain PH1 utilizing meta-aminophenol. Can J Microbiol 46:211–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Qureshi A, Prabu SK, Purohit HJ (2001) Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas strain for utilization of 4-nitrophenol. Microbes and Environ 16:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2007) Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by Diaphorobacter sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:403–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Qureshi A, Verma V, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2007) Degradation of 4-nitroaniline by Stenotrophomonas strain HPC135. Int Biodeterio Biodeg 60:215–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Villas-Boas SG, Bruheim P (2007) The potential of metabolomics tools in bioremediation studies. OMICS 11: 305–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ahuja SK, Ferreira GM, Moreira AR (2004) Utilization of enzymes for environmental applications. Critical Rev in Biotechnol 24:125–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen WC, Chang N-B, Chen J-C (2003) Rough set-based hybrid fuzzy-neural controller design for industrial wastewater treatment. Water Research 37:95–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Cadet C, Beteau JF, Hernandez SC (2004) Multi-criteria control strategy for cost/quality compromise in wastewater treatment plants. Control Eng Practice 12: 335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Purohit HJ, Raje DV, Kapley A, Padmanabhan P, Singh RN (2003) Genomics tools in environmental impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 37:356–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemant J. Purohit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapley, A., Purohit, H.J. Genomic tools in bioremediation. Indian J Microbiol 49, 108–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-009-0012-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-009-0012-2

Keywords

Navigation