Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action

  • Review
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plants possess a range of active defense apparatuses that can be actively expressed in response to biotic stresses (pathogens and parasites) of various scales (ranging from microscopic viruses to phytophagous insect). The timing of this defense response is critical and reflects on the difference between coping and succumbing to such biotic challenge of necrotizing pathogens/parasites. If defense mechanisms are triggered by a stimulus prior to infection by a plant pathogen, disease can be reduced. Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR) are two forms of induced resistance wherein plant defenses are preconditioned by prior infection or treatment that results in resistance against subsequent challenge by a pathogen or parasite. Selected strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) suppress diseases by antagonism between the bacteria and soil-borne pathogens as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in plant against both root and foliar pathogens. Rhizobacteria mediated ISR resembles that of pathogen induced SAR in that both types of induced resistance render uninfected plant parts more resistant towards a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Several rhizobacteria trigger the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent SAR pathway by producing SA at the root surface whereas other rhizobacteria trigger different signaling pathway independent of SA. The existence of SA-independent ISR pathway has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, which is dependent on jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signaling. Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in viz., carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco, and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation. Combination of ISR and SAR can increase protection against pathogens that are resisted through both pathways besides extended protection to a broader spectrum of pathogens than ISR/SAR alone. Beside Pseudomonas strains, ISR is conducted by Bacillus spp. wherein published results show that several specific strains of species B. amyloliquifaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B.sphaericus elicit significant reduction in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weller DM, Raajmakers JM, Gardener BBM & Thomashow LS (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressivness plant pathogens. Annl Rev Phytopathol 40: 309–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haas D, Keel C & Reimann C (2002) Signal transduction in plant beneficial rhizobacteria with biocontrol properties. Antonie van Leeuw 81:385–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van Loon LC & Glick BR (2004) Increased plant fitness by rhizobacteria. In:Molecular ecotoxicology of plants (Sandermann H eds.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin: Heidelberg, pp 177–205

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haas D & Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Rev Microbiol 4:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pieterse CMJ, Ton J & van Loon LC (2001) Cross-talk between plant defence signaling pathways: boost or burden? Agri Biotech Net 3:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ton J, van Pelt JA van Loon LC & Pieterse CMJ (2002) Differential effectiveness of salicylate-dependent and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent induced resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 15:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I & Lorito M (2004) Trichoderma species, opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Rev Microbiol 2:43–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ongena M et al. (2004) Stimulation of the lipooxygenase pathway is associated with systemic resistance induced in bean by a nonpathogenic Pseudomonas strain. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 17:1009–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Verhagen BWM et al. (2004) The transcription of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 17:895–908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iavicoli A, Boutet E, Buchela A & Métraux J-P (2003) Induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to root inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 16:851–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Audenaert K, Pattery T, Comelis P & Hötte M (2002) Induction of systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato by P. aeruginosa 7NSK2: role of salicylic acid, pyochelin, and pyocyanin. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 15: 1147–1156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pathak A, Sharma A & Johri BN (2004) Pseudomonas strain GRP3 induces systemic resistance to sheath blight in rice. Int Rice Res Notes 29:35–36

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ryu C-M et al. (2004) Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134:1017–1026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakker PAHM, Ron LX, Pieterse CMJ & van Loon LC (2003) Understanding the involvement of rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance in biocontrol of plant diseases. Can J Plant Pathol 25:5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Loon LC (2000) Systemic induced resistance. In: Mechanisms of resistance to plant diseases (Slusarenko AJ, Fraser RSS & van Loon LC eds.) Kluwer: Dordrechet, pp 521–574

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez-Gómez L (2004) Plant perception systems for pathogen recognition and defence. Mol Immunol 41:1055–1062

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erbs G & Newmann MA (2003) The role of lipopolysaccharides in induction of plant defense responses. Mol Plant Pathol 4:421–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meziane H, Vander SI, van Loon LC, Höfte M & Bakker PAHM (2005) Determinants of P. putida WCS 358 involved in induced systemic resistance in plants. Mol Plant Pathol 6: 177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Durrent WE & Dong X (2004) Systemic acquired resistance. Annl Rev Phytopathol 42:185–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong X (2004) NPR1, all things considered. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:547–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Meyer G & Höfte M (1997) Salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacteria P. aeruginosa 7NSK2 induces resistance to leaf infection by Botrytis cinerea on bean. Phytopathol 87: 588–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ryu CM, Hu CH, Reddy MS & Kloepper JW (2003) Different signaling pathways of induced resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of P. syringae. New Phytol 16:413–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park KS & Kloepper JW (2000) Activation of PR-1a promotes by rhizobacteria which induce systemic resistance in tobacco against P. syringae pv. tabaci. Biol Control 18:2–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang S, Moyne AL, Reddy M-S and Kloepper JW (2002) The role of salicylic acid in induced systemic resistance elicited by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against blue mold of tobacco. Biol Control 25:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kinkema M, Fan W, & Dong X (2000) Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. Plant Cell 12:2339–2350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Després C, Delong C, Glaze S, Liu E, & Fobert PR (2000) The Arabidopsis NPR1/Nim 1 protein enhances the DNA binding activity of a subgroup of the TGA family of bZIP transcription factors. Plant Cell 12:279–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Subramaniam R, Desveaux D, Spickler C, Michnick SW & Brisson N (2001) Direct visualisation of protein interaction in plant cells. Nature Biotechnol 19:769–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomma BPHJ, Tierens KFM, Penninckx IAMA, Mauch-Mani B, Broekaert WF & Cammue BPA (2001) Different micro-organisms differentially induces Arabidopsis disease response pathways. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:673–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomma BPHJ, Eggermont K, Broekaert WF & Cammue BPA (2000) Disease development of several fungi on Arabidopsis can be reduced by treatment with methyl jasmonate. Plant Physiol Biochem 38:421–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Achuo EA, Audenaert K, Meziane H & Höfte M (2004) The salicylic acid-dependent defense pathway is effective against different pathogens in tomato and tobacco. Plant Pathol 53: 65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Conrath U, Pieterse CMJ & Mauch-mani B (2002) Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 7:210–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim MS, Kim YC & Cho BH (2004) Gene expression analysis in cucumber leaves primed by root colonization with P. chlororaphis O6 upon challenge-inoculation with Corynespora cassiicola. Plant Biol 6:105–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma A, Johri BN, Sharma AK & Glick BR (2003) Plant growth promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. Strain GRP3 influences iron acquisition in mung bean (Vigna radiate L. Wilzeck). Soil Biol Biochem 35:887–894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma A, Jansen R, Johri BN & Wray V (2007) Molecular and structural characterization of rhamnolipids of rhizobacteria that reduce post-emergence dampinf-off disease in chile and tomato in Central Himalayan region. J Nat Prod (In Press)

  35. Sharma A, Wray V & Johri BN (2007) Molecular characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria that enhance peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities in chile (Capsicum annuum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Arch Microbiol 188:483–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. van Wees SCM, Pieterse CMJ, Trijssenaar A, vańt Westende Y, hartog F & van Loon LC (1997) Differential induction of systemic resistance in Arabidopsis by biocontrol bacteria. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 10:716–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Duijff BJ, Meijer JW, Bakker PAHM & Schippers B (1993) Siderophore-mediated competition for Fe and induced resistance in the suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Netherland J Plant Pathol 99: 277–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leeman M, van Pelt JA, Den OFM, Heinsbroek M, Bakker PAHM & Schippers B (1995) Induction of systemic resistance by P. fluorescens in radish cultivars differing in susceptibility to Fusarium wilt, using a novel bioassay. Euro J Plant Pathol 101:655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. De Meyer G, Audenaert K & Höfte M (1999) Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2-induced systemic resistance in tobacco depends on in planta salicylic acid accumulation but is not associated with PR1a expression. Euro J Plant Pathol 105: 513–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. De Meyer G, Capieau K, Audenaert K, Buchela A, Métraux JP & Höfte M (1999) Nanogram amounts of SA produced by rhizobacteria P. aeruginosa 7NSK2 activate the SAR pathway in bean. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 12: 450–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Maurhofer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, Métraux JP & Défago G (1994) Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to TNV by the root-colonizing P. fluorescens strain CHA0: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathol 84:139–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Siddiqui IA & Saukat SS (2003) Suppression of root-knot disease by P. fluorescens CHA0 in tomato: importance of bacterial secondary metabolite 2,4 DAPG. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1615–1623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Weller DM, van Pelt JA, Mavrodi DV, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM & van Loon LC (2004) ISR in Arabidopsis against P. syringae pv. tomato by 2,4 DAPG-producing P. fluorescens. Phytopathol 94:5108

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leeman M, van Pelt JA, Den OFM, Heinsbroek M, Bakker PAHM & Schippers B (1995) Induction of SR against Fusarium wilt of radish by LPS of P. fluorescens. Phytopathol 85:1021–1027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Leeman M, Den OFM, van Pelt JA, Dirkx FPM, Steijl H, Bakker PAHM & Schippers B (1996) Iron availability affects induction of SR aginst Fusarium wilt of radish P. fluorescens. Phytopathol 86:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. van Peer R & Schippers B (1992) LPS of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r induce resistance in carnation to Fusarium wilt. Nether Plant Pathol 98:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Reitz M, Oger P, Meyer A, Niehaus K, Farrand SK, Hallmann J & Sikora RA (2002) Importance of the O-antigen, core-region and lipid A of rhizobial LPS for the induction of SR in potato to Globodera pallida. Nematol 4:73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Press CM, Wilson M, Tuzun S & Kloepper JW (1997) SA produced by S. imarcescens 90–166 is not the primary determinant of ISR in cucumber/ tobacco. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 10:761–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Siddiqui IA & Saukat SS (2004) Systemic resistance in tomato induced by biocontrol bacteria against the root-knot nematode, Meloidegyne javanica is independent of SA production. J Phytopathol 152:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Spencer M, Ryu CM, Yang KY, Kim YC, Kloepper JW & Anderson AJ (2003) Induced defense in tobacco by P. chlororaphis strain O6 involves at least the ethylene pathway. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 63:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pieterse CMJ, van Wees SCM, Hoffland E, van Pelt JA & van Loon LC (1996) SR in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria independent of SA accumulation and PRs expression. Plant Cell 8:1225–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Yan Z, Reddy MS, Ryu CM, Mc Inroy JA Wilson M & Kloepper JW (2002) Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by PGPR. Phytopathol 92: 1329–1333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, 462 026, India

    Devendra K. Choudhary, Anil Prakash & B. N. Johri

Authors
  1. Devendra K. Choudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anil Prakash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. N. Johri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. N. Johri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choudhary, D.K., Prakash, A. & Johri, B.N. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action. Indian J Microbiol 47, 289–297 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation