Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Update on New Daily Persistent Headache

  • Headache (JR Couch, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is an uncommon and under-recognized primary headache disorder. Clinically, NDPH may resemble migraine or tension-type headache. Unlike migraine or tension-type headaches, however, a distinguishing feature of NDPH is that the majority of patients with NDPH can pinpoint the exact date of onset of symptoms. While cases can arise de novo, in multiple reports, a viral illness precedes the onset of headache. NDPH has two temporal profiles: a self-limited form that resolves spontaneously without treatment and a refractory, persistent form in which headaches continue unabated for years. Diagnosis is predicated on first eliminating secondary mimics via diagnostic imaging and hematological studies. Lumbar puncture should be considered in patients who are refractory to treatment to search for alterations in CSF pressure or for an infectious process. There have been no randomized clinical trials utilizing acute or preventive therapies for NDPH. In clinical practice, treatment is aimed at matching the predominant headache phenotype; nonetheless, most therapies are generally ineffective or only partially effective. Not surprisingly, medication overuse is very common among patients with this disorder and should be identified, although in most patients, eliminating medication overuse does not alter the course of the illness. There have been reports of successful treatment combining doxycycline 100 mg and montelukast 10 mg, dosed BID for 3 months. Anecdotally, in our practice, this combination has occasionally provided good results. Onabotulinum toxin injections are currently under investigation and may provide a potential new effective treatment regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Vanast WJ, Edmonton MD. Program abstracts of the twenty-eighth annual meeting the american association for the study of headache june 27, 28 and 29, 1986, chicago, illinois U.S.A. new daily persistent headaches definition of a benign syndrome. Headache. 1981;26(6):317.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rozen T. New daily persistent headache: an update. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(7):431. This article provides the most recent review of definition, pathophysiology and treatments for NDPH. Dr. Rozen has published several articles on this condition but this is to our knowledge his most recent one.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozen T. New daily persistent headache: clinical perspective. Headache. 2011;51(4):641–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version): 4.10 new daily persistent headache. Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):679. Most recent classification of headache disorders. This article provides diagnostic criteria for all headache disorders (both primary and secondary). It is a good reference for any clinician to refer to when evaluating patients with headache.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 2nd edition: 4.8 new daily persistent headache. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(S1):52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robbins MS, Grosberg BM, Napchan U, Crystal SC, Lipton RB. Clinical and prognostic subforms of new daily-persistent headache. Neurology. 2010;74(17):1358. Also a good source for understanding description, etiology, pathophysiology and treatments for NDPH. Given that it was published in 2010, NDPH diagnostic criteria used is from ICHD-2 (has some differences from ICHD-3) but goes into good detail on different proposed sub-forms of NDPH.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rozen T, Swidan SZ. Elevation of CSF tumor necrosis factor α levels in new daily persistent headache and treatment refractory chronic migraine. Headache. 2007;47(7):1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rozen T, Roth JM, Denenberg N. Saturday poster presentations—2: joint hypermobility as a predisposing factor for the development of new daily persistent headache. Headache. 2005;45(6):823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi SG, Mathew PG, Markley HG. New daily persistent headache and potential new therapeutic agents. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014;14(2):425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rozen T. Special issue: 50th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society Abstracts. S24: doxycycline for new daily persistent headache. Headache. 2008;48(S1):S49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Truven health analytics. Micromedex solutions. Retrieved 12/28, 2015, from https://www.micromedexsolutions.com/home/dispatch/ssl/true 2015.

  12. Rozen T. 44th Annual Scientific Meeting, American Scientific Society, June 21–23, 2002, Seattle, Washington (pages 389–463). S133: successful treatment of new daily persistent headache with gabapentin and topiramate. Headache. 2002;42(4):389.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prakash S, Shah ND. Post-infectious new daily persistent headache may respond to intravenous methylprednisolone. J Headache Pain. 2010;11(1):59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Marmura MJ, Passero FC, Young WB. Mexiletine for refractory chronic daily headache: a report of nine cases. Headache. 2008;48(10):1506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Young WB, Marmura M, Ashkenazi A, Evans RW. Expert opinion: greater occipital nerve and other anesthetic injections for primary headache disorders. Headache. 2008;48(7):1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blumenfeld A, Ashkenazi A, Napchan U, Bender SD, Klein BC, Berliner R, et al. Expert consensus recommendations for the performance of peripheral nerve blocks for headaches—a narrative review. Headache. 2013;53(3):437. Excellent source to learn how to perform nerve blocks. Standarized method for performing nerve blockade presented. Has good pictures showing technique for nerve blockade.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spears RC. Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in new daily persistent headache. J Headache Pain. 2008;9(6):405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Blumenfeld A, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. Method of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment paradigm based on the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50(9):1406. Describes onabotulinum toxin paradigm for chronic migraine. Goes into detail on mixing toxin, units used per muscle. Has good pictures on injection locations and amount of toxin injected per site. Similar paradigm is being used in NDPH studies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(7):804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(7):793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mack KJ. New daily persistent headache in children and adults. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13(1):47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence C. Newman MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Hida Nierenburg declares no conflict of interest. Lawrence C. Newman is an advisor for and received honorarium from Allergan, Lilly, and Teva. He receives royalties from Oxford Univ Press and Springer Scientific.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Headache

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nierenburg, H., Newman, L.C. Update on New Daily Persistent Headache. Curr Treat Options Neurol 18, 25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-016-0408-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-016-0408-3

Keywords

Navigation