Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Posterior compartment defect repair in vaginal surgery: Update on surgical techniques

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Posterior colporrhaphy has been the most common surgical technique for the repair of posterior compartment defects. Traditional posterior colporrhaphy involves plication of the levator ani, which may result in dyspareunia related to narrowing of the introitus. Current posterior compartment repairs either plicate the midline fascia or repair the specific site of fascial weakness. Despite insubstantial data, the use of grafts to reinforce posterior repairs has gained popularity. Grafts such as allografts, xenografts, and synthetic meshes have been used to reinforce the posterior wall. Complications include infection and erosion, as well as recurrence of prolapse. Minimally invasive techniques have been developed to recreate the apical support of the vaginal vault and repair the posterior prolapse. Properly conducted randomized prospective trials are needed to adequately assess these new approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M: Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. BJOG 1997, 104:579–585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen A.L, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al.: Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:501–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fornell EU, Wingren G, Kjolhede P: Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al.: Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:295–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey JO: Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 180:815–821.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson AC: The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993, 36:976–983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Milley PS, Nichols DH: A correlative investigation of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec 1969, 163:443–451.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleeman SD, Westermann C, Karram MM: Rectoceles and the anatomy of the posterior vaginal wall: revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:2050–2055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell SA, Dempsey T, Geldenhuys L: Histologic examination of “fascia” used in colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 98:794–798.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moschowitz A: The pathogenesis, anatomy, and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1912, 15:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert HG, Vayre P: Considérations anatomiques et thérapeutiques. A propos de 25 observations [in French]. Ann Chir 1964, 18:1060–1071.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baessler K, Schuessler B: Anatomy of the sigmoid colon, rectum, and the rectovaginal pouch in women with enterocele and anterior rectal wall procidentia. Clin Anat 2006, 19:125–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley CS, Brown MB, Cundiff GW, et al.: Bowel symptoms in women planning surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 195:1814–1819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. da Silva GM, Gurland B, Sleemi A, et al.: Posterior vaginal wall prolapse does not correlate with fecal symptoms or objective measures of anorectal function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 195:1742–1747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, et al.: Functional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:2105–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, et al.: Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:982–988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cole EE, Kaufman MR, Scarpero HM, et al.: The effects of isolated posterior compartment defects on lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic findings. BJU Int 2006, 97:1024–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tunuguntla H, Gousse AE: Female sexual dysfunction following vaginal surgery: a review. J Urol 2006, 175:439–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Puigdollers A, Fernandez-Fraga X, Azpiroz F: Persistent symptoms of functional outlet obstruction after rectocele repair. Colorectal Dis 2007, 9:262–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobashi KC, Leach GE: Pelvic prolapse. J Urol 2000, 164:879–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Francis WJ, Jeffcoate TN: Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1961, 68:1–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kahn MA, Stanton SL: Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:82–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mellgren A, Anzen B, Nilsson BY, et al.: Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995, 38:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez A, Anzen B, Bremmer S, et al.: Durability of success after rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, et al.: Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 105:314–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L: Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 181:1360–1363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, et al.: The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 181:1353–1358; discussion 1358–1359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Glavind K, Madsen H: A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000, 79:145–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, et al.: An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 179:1451–1456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maher C, Baessler K: Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005, 17:84–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Baessler K, et al.: Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:685–689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh KE, Cortes E, Reid WM: Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 101:320–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Paraiso MFR, Barber MD, Muir TW, et al.: Rectocele repair: A randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 195:1762–1771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al.: Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184:1357–1364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, et al.: Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG 2005, 112:107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kohli N, Miklos JR: Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:146–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kobashi KC, Leach GE, Frederick R, et al.: Initial experience with rectocele repair using nonfrozen cadaveric fascia lata interposition. Urology 2005, 66:1203–1207; discussion 1207–1208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dell JR, O’Kelley KR: PelviSoft BioMesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients. Int Urogynecol J 2005, 16:44–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Altman D, Zetterstrom J, Mellgren A, et al.: A three-year prospective assessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 107:59–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. de Tayrac R, Picone O, Chauveaud-Lambing A, et al.: A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2006, 17:100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lim YN, Rane A, Muller R: An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh. Int Urogynecol J 2005, 16:126–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gandhi S, Kubba LM, Abramov Y, et al.: Histopathologic changes of porcine dermis xenografts for transvaginal suburethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:1643–1648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA: Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 2004, 111:831–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, et al.: Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J 2006, 17:315–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, et al.: Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift trademark technique): a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, In press.

  46. Altman D, Falconer C: Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:303–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouidou P, Rohne J, et al.: Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, In press.

  48. Jordaan DJ, Prollius A, Cronje HS, et al.: Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2006, 17:326–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Farnsworth BN: Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002, 13:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Baessler K, Hewson AD, Tunn R, et al.: Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106:713–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA

    Kathleen C. Kobashi

Authors
  1. Anh T. Van Ginger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen C. Kobashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen C. Kobashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Ginger, A.T., Kobashi, K.C. Posterior compartment defect repair in vaginal surgery: Update on surgical techniques. Curr Urol Rep 8, 387–393 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-007-0036-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-007-0036-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation