Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a new technique in the surgical treatment of rectocele using a dermal allograft to augment site-specific fascial defect repair of the rectovaginal fascia. The posterior vaginal wall is opened and discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia are repaired in a site-specific fashion using delayed absorbable suture. A second layer of support is created using a rectangular dermal allograft placed over the site-specific repair and secured to the normal anatomic attachments of the rectovaginal fascia using permanent sutures. The vagina is then closed and routine perineorrhaphy performed as indicated. Forty-three women with advanced posterior vaginal wall prolapse underwent dermal graft augmentation of site-specific rectocele repair over a 1-year period. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. Thirty women were available for follow-up examination at an average of 12.9 months (range 8–17). The average patient age in the follow-up group was 63.6 ± 10.9 years (range 33–79) and average parity was 2.8 ± 1.5 (range 0–7). Using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification score, the average measurement of point Ap was 0.25 preoperatively and −2.4 postoperatively, whereas point Bp was 0.9 preoperatively and −2.5 postoperatively. Using a point Ap measurement of −0.5 or greater to define surgical failure, 28/30 (93%) of women were noted to have surgical cure on follow-up. Site-specific rectocele repair augmented with dermal allograft is associated with high cure rates and minimal complications. It recreates normal anatomic support and is easily adapted into current surgical procedures for rectocele repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104:82–86

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richardson AC (1993) The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance and rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:976–983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addsion WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457

    Google Scholar 

  4. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gyecol 181:1353–1359

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzgerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L (1999) Failure of allograft slings. BJU Int 84:785–788

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weber AM, Walters MD (1997) Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 89:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sclafani AP, Romo T III, Jacono AA, McCormick S, Cocker R, Parker A (2000) Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:130–136

    Google Scholar 

  8. Terino EO (2001) Alloderm acellular dermal graft: applications in aesthetic soft-tissue augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 28:83–99

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng JT, Perkins SW, Hamilton MM (2000) Perioral rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 8:2223–2233

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miklos JR, Kohli N (1999) Rectovaginal fistula repair utilizing a cadaveric dermal allograft. Int Urogynecol J 10:405–406

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Miklos.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: This case series reports the use of human dermis to augment rectocele repair. This report clearly describes the technique, although dermal augmentation cannot be recommended in the absence of a randomized trial that demonstrates the superiority of this technique compared to the standard technique. Scientifically sound studies with appropriate follow-up are necessary to document the "safety and efficacy" of new materials. The safety and efficacy of this technique remains unproven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohli, N., Miklos, J.R. Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J 14, 146–149 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-002-1013-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-002-1013-4

Keywords

Navigation