Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PelviSoft BioMesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graft materials have been utilized in the repair of posterior vaginal wall defects to enhance anatomical and functional results, and to improve long-term outcomes. We report on our initial series of 35 patients treated with porcine dermal acellular collagen matrix BioMesh (PelviSoft BioMesh, CR Bard, Cranston, R.I., USA), which has alleviated problems with early postoperative vaginal mucosal dehiscence and delayed healing experienced with the use of other graft materials in the posterior vaginal wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: it’s effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:82–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1360–1364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Francis WJA, Jeffcoate TNA (1961) Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comm 68:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR (2000) Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson AC (1993) The rectovaginal septum revisited: it’s relationship to rectocele and its importance to rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:976–983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson AC (1995) The anatomical defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelvic Surg 1:214

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cundiff GW, Weidner AL, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomical and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) the anatomic and functional outcome of defect specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1353–1359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vassallo BJ, Karram MM (2003) Management of iatrogenic vaginal constriction. Obstet Gynecol 101:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohli N, Miklos J (2003) Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J 14:146–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. Dell.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: This case series reports the use of fenestrated porcine acellular collagen matrix to augment rectocele repair. While this alteration of the porcine graft is novel, few conclusions can be drawn from this descriptive case series in regards to any possible benefits it may have over traditional grafts. The lack of standardized follow-up in this series, apart from POP-Q measurements, requires that the reader be skeptical of the stated lack of bowel or sexual complaints following this procedure. Nonetheless, the lack of any serious complications after 1 year of follow-up as reported by the authors is reassuring

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dell, J.R., O’Kelley, K.R. PelviSoft BioMesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients. Int Urogynecol J 16, 44–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1217-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1217-x

Keywords

Navigation