Skip to main content
Log in

How children learn to read and why they fail

  • Part I Long-Term Perspectives
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article considers the contrast between conceptions of reading as a natural and as an unnatural act, relying on the simple view of reading as a theoretical framework (Gough and Tunmer 1986). According to the simple view, reading comprehension is a product of both listening comprehension and decoding. Here it is argued that the comprehension aspect of reading depends on those same—natural—forces that govern acquisition of spoken language, whereas decoding depends on explicit tutelage, with little evidence that children will induce the cipher from simple exposure to written words and their pronunciations (sight-word instruction). Rejecting both sight-word and phonics instruction as inadequate in and of themselves, evidence is reviewed suggesting that successful readers require explicit awareness of the phonological structure of spoken words, which can and should be taught in kindergarten, prior to formal reading instruction. Beyond this point, reading success depends on a modicum of phonics instruction together with extensive practice with reading itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. 1990.Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. M. 1993. Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58(10):1–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E., and Blachman, B. 1991. Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly 26:49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. S., and Salapatek, P. 1983. Infant visual perception. In P. H. Mussen (ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. 1989. Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention. In G. Kamhi and W. Catts (eds.),Reading disabilities: A Developmental Perspective p. 133–58. Boston: College Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A., and Francis, J. 1991. Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction.Applied Psycholinguistics 12:91–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. 1992. Studies in the acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (eds.),Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., and Haller, M. 1993. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review 100(4):589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewitz, P., and Stammer, J. 1980. The development of linguistic awareness in young children from label reading to word recognition. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Ehri, L. C. 1983. A critique of five studies related to letter-name knowledge and learning to read. In L. M. Gentile, M. L. Kamil, and J. S. Blanchard (eds.),Reading Research Revisited. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S., and Goodman, Y. M. 1979. Learning to read is natural. In L. B. Resnick and P. A. Weaver (eds.),Theory and Practice of Early Reading (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Y. M. 1986. Children coming to know literacy. In W. H. Teale and E. Sulzby (eds.),Emergent Literacy: Writing and Reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. E. 1991. Rhyming, analogy, and children’s reading. In P. B. Gough, L. Ehri, and R. Treiman (eds.),Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. 1983. Context, form, and interaction. In K. Rayner (ed.),Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. 1993. The beginning of decoding.Reading and Writing 5:181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. 1995. The New Literacy: Caveat emptor.Journal of Research in Reading 18(2):79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Juel, C. J., and Griffith, P. L. 1992. Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (eds.),Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., and Hillinger, M. L. 1980. Learning to read: An unnatural act.Bulletin of The Orton Society 30:179–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., and Juel, C. 1991. The first stages of word recognition. In L. Rieben and C. A. Perfetti (eds.),Learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Juel, C., and Roper-Schneider, D. 1983. A two-stage model of initial reading acquisition. In J. A. Niles and L. A. Harris (eds.),Searches for Meaning in Reading/Language Processing and Instruction. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., and Tunmer, W. E. 1986. Decoding, reading, and reading disability.RASE: Remedial and Special Education 7:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., and Walsh, M. A. 1991. Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In S. Brady and D. Shankweiler (eds.),Phonological Processes in Literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, J. 1982. The enigma of hyperlexia.Reading Research Quarterly 17:319–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., and Gough, P. B. 1990. The simple view of reading.Reading and Writing 2:127–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., and Gough, P. B. 1985. Reading and spelling strategies of first-grade children. In J. A. Niles and R. Lalik (eds.),Issues in Literacy: A Research Perspective. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., and Gough, P. B. 1986. Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade.Journal of Educational Psychology 78:243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, L., and Gough, P. B. 1990. Word length and first word recognition. In J. Zuttell and S. McCormick (eds.),Literacy Theory and Research: Analyses from Multiple Paradigms. Thirty-ninth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (Vol. 39). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Frost, J., and Petersen, O. 1988. Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children.Reading Research Quarterly 23:263–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masonheimer, P. E., Drum, P. A., and Ehri, L. C. 1984. Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading?Journal of Reading Behavior 16:257–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., and Rack, J. 1994. Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, W., and Pizzilo, C. 1970–71. Effect of intralist similarity on kindergarten pupils rate of word acquisition and transfer.Journal of Reading Behavior 3:14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei, M. 1952.The Story of English. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L., and Hughes, C. 1987. Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33:283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. 1994.The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., and Beatty, A. S. 1994.Listening to Children Read Aloud. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., and Patterson, K. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review 103(1):56–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., and Olson, R. K. 1992. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review.Reading Research Quarterly 27(1):28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. 1976. Developmental changes in word recognition strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology 68:323–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. 1986.Children’s Creative Spelling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S., and Dobrich, W. 1994. On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers.Developmental Review 14:245–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., and Evans, H. M. 1994. Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read.Reading and Writing 6(3):221–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., and Matthews, R. 1984. Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition.Journal of Educational Psychology 76:1309–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S. L. 1982.The REAL Reason Why Johnny Still Can’t Read. Smithtown, NY: Exposition Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. 1973. Twelve ways to make learning to read difficult. In F. Smith (ed.),Psycholinguistics and Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E. 1985. Children’s emergent reading of favorite storybooks: A developmental study.Reading Research Quarterly 20:458–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E., and Teale, W. 1991. Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, and P. D. Pearson (eds.),Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. II). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., and Zukowski, A. 1991. Levels of phonological awareness. In S. Brady and D. Shankweiler (eds.),Phonological Processes in Literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., and Nesdale, A. R. 1985. Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading.Journal of Educational Psychology 77:417–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P., Blumberg, E. L., and Williams, D. V. 1970. Cues used in visual word recognition.Journal of Educational Psychology 61:310–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaden, D. B., Jr., Smolkin, L. B., and Conlon, A. 1989. Preschoolers’ questions about pictures, print convention, and story text during reading aloud at home.Reading Research Quarterly 24(2):188–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H. K. 1988. The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests.Reading Research Quarterly 23:159–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gough, P.B. How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia 46, 1–20 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648168

Keywords

Navigation