Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction

  • Part III Research Into Practice: Instruction And Intervention
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major conclusion from research regarding children with poor reading performance is that early, systematic instruction in phonological awareness and phonics improves early reading and spelling skills and results in a reduction of the number of students who read below grade level. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions and knowledge of presevice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. The results indicated that these educators expressed positive attitudes toward explicit and implicit code instruction, with inservice educators more positive about explicit code instruction than preservice educators and preservice educators more positive about implicit code instruction. Preservice and inservice educators demonstrated limited knowledge of phonological awareness or terminology related to language structure and phonics. Additionally, they perceived themselves as only somewhat prepared to teach early reading to struggling readers. These findings indicate a continuing mismatch between what educators believe and know and what convergent research supports as effective early reading instruction for children at risk for reading difficulties. Implications support continuing efforts to inform and reform teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Resolving the great debate. American Educator, 19(2), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, P. L., & Bos, C. S. (1992). Dimensions of professional development: Weaving teaching beliefs and strategic content. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools (pp. 457–476). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, P. L., Hoffman, J. V., & Duffy, G. G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 719–742). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R., & Sadow, M. W. (1989). Influence of basal programs on fourth-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 44–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 251–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. A., Ball, E. W., Black, R. S., & Tangel, D. M. (1994). Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C. S., Mather, N., Friedman Narr, R., & Babur, N. (1999). Interactive, collaborative professional development in early literacy instruction: Supporting the balancing act. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C. S., Nahmias, M., & Urban, M. (1997). Implementing interactive professional development in a workshop course on educating students with AD/HD. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 132–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation. A position paper of the International Dyslexia Association. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Department of Education. (1996). The California reading initiative. Sacramento, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chard, D. J., & Osborn, J. (1999). Phonics and word recognition instruction in early reading programs: Guidelines for accessibility. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFord, D. E. (1985). Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, S. V., & Bursuck, W. (in press). Early intervention for at-risk readers: A 3-year teacher change model. In D. Wiseman (ed.), Research strategies for education.

  • Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, G. G., & Anderson, L. (1982). Conceptions of reading project: Final report. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED218583).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed., p. 92). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. B. (2000). Literacy instruction in teacher education: A comparison of teacher education in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Teachers College, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1997). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R. (1998). Why reading is not natural. Educational Leadership, 3, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R. (1999). The NICHD research program in reading development, reading disorders and reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Center for Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., Quiroga, T., & Gray, A. L. (in press). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities.

  • McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. W. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L.C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of “balanced” reading instruction, New York: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Reading Panel, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. (1999). Teachers learning Ladders to Literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E., Jenkins, J. R., & Slocum, T. A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J, & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podhajski, B. (2000). TIME for Teachers: A model professional development program to increase early literacy. Their World, 35–37.

  • Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., Baker, K., Brooks, G., Cronin, J., Nelson, E., & Woo, D. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rath, L. K. (1994). The phonemic awareness of reading teachers: Examining aspects of knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 109–112). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, B. A., Holford, T. R., Holahan, J. M., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995). A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading: Results from a longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 894–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, D. C., Kame’enui, E. J., & Chard, D. J. (1996). General education teachers’ assumptions about learning and students with learning disabilities: Design-of-instruction analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials used in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Education Agency. (1996). The Texas reading initiative. Austin, TX: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., & Burgess, S. R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In J. C. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading (pp. 161–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troyer, S. J., & Yopp, H. K. (1990). Kindergarten teachers’ knowledge of emergent literacy concepts. Reading Improvement, 27, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2001). No child left behind. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Mather.

Additional information

Just prior to publication, the editorial office was informed of the untimely death of the first author, Candace Bos, who died on August 13, 2001.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S. et al. Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Ann. of Dyslexia 51, 97–120 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0

Keywords

Navigation