Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms

Does it make a difference?

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that training in phoneme awareness has a positive impact on beginning reading and spelling. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of instruction in phonological awareness provided in low-income, inner-city kindergarten classrooms by kindergarten teachers and their teaching assistants. Prior to the intervention, the 84 treatment children and 75 control children, who attended inner-city schools in an urban district in upstate New York, did not differ on age, sex, race, SES, PPVT-R score, phoneme segmentation, letter name knowledge, letter sound knowledge, or reading. After the 11 week intervention, the treatment children significantly outperformed the control children on measures of phoneme segmentation, letter name and letter sound knowledge, two of three reading measures, and a measure of invented spelling. Implications for improving beginning reading instruction are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990).Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E. W. & Blachman B. A. (1988). Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness,Annals of Dyslexia 38: 208–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does Phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?,Reading Research Quarterly 26(1): 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skill to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement,Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 610–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. (1989). Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (eds.),Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective (pp. 133–158). Boston: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. (1991). Early intervention for children's reading problems: Clinical applications of the research in phonological awareness,Topics in Language Disorders 12(1): 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. (1994). Early literacy acquisition: The role of phonological awareness. In G. Wallach & K. Butler (eds.),Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some underlying principles and applications. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. & James, S. (1986). A longitudinal study of metalinguistic abilities and reading achievement in primary grade children. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

  • Bradley, L. (1988). Making connections in learning to read and spellApplied Cognitive Psychology 2: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection,Nature 30: 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1985).Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. & Shankweiler, D., eds. (1991).Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children,Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 451–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up,Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1983).Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit vs. implicit instruction in phonemic awareness,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50(3): 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. & Wilce, L. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words?,Reading Research Quarterly 12(1): 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkonin, D. B. (1973). U.S.S.R. In J. Downing (ed.),Comparative reading (pp. 551–580). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B. & Routh, D. K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited,Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6): 1059–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1978). Spelling difficulties,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 19: 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990).Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability,Remedial and Special Education 7: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, W. & Ehri, L. (1983). Do alphabet letters help prereaders acquire phonemic segmentation skills?,Journal of Educational Psychology 75(5): 752–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, S. & Tunmer, W. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery Program,Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1986). Support for the theory of phonemic awareness as a predictor of literacy acquisition. In J. Niles & R. Lalik (eds.),Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers (pp. 239–243). Thirty-Fifth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades,Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P. & Gough, P. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade,Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, N. (1980). Phonemic awareness training: What to teach and how to teach it,Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 686–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code,Psychological Review 74: 731–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y. (1971). Basic research in speech and lateralization of language: Some implications for reading disability,Bulletin of the Orton Society 21: 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition,Bulletin of the Orton Society 23: 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Rubin, H., Duquès, S. & Carlisle, J. (1985). Linguistic abilities and spelling proficiency in kindergarteners and adult poor spellers. In D. B. Gray & J. F. Kavanagh (eds.),Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 163–176). Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write,Remedial and Special Education 6: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Blachman, B. A., Camp, L. & Werfelman, M. (1980). Steps towards literacy. In P. Levinson & C. Sloan (eds.),Auditory processing and language: Clinical and research perspectives (pp. 189–215). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Peterson, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children,Reading Research Quarterly 23(3): 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A. & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skill in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten,Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21: 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty,Annals of Dyslexia 34: 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A. & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory: Can they presage early reading problems?,Journal of Learning Disabilities 17: 592–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, A. & Lundberg, I. (1983). Can phonemic awareness be trained in kindergarten?,Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 24: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1971). Pre-school children's knowledge of English phonology,Harvard Educational Review 41: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieben, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (eds.) (1991).Learning to read: Basic research and its implications Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1989).Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. J., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R. & Mathews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading achievement,Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6): 466–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy,Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (eds.) (1987). Introduction [Special issue].Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33(3).

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability,Annals of Dyslexia 38: 154–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E. & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangel, D. & Blachman, B. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children's invented spelling,Journal of Reading Behavior 24: 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T. & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children,Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 364–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torneus, M. (1984). Phonological awareness and reading: A chicken and egg problem?,Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6): 1346–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules,Memory & Cognition 11: 382–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction,Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R. & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study,Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33(3): 321–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. & Torgesen, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Bulletin 101(2): 192–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1979). The ABD's of reading: A program for the learning disabled. In L. B. Resnick & P.A. Weaver (eds.),Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 3, pp. 179–195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1980). Teaching decoding with an emphasis on phoneme analysis and phoneme blending,Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1987). Educational treatments for dyslexia at the elementary and secondary levels. In W. Ellis (ed.),Intimacy with language: A forgotten basic in teacher education. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Special Education Programs, School of Education, Syracuse University, 805 S. Crouse Avenue, 13244-2280, Syracuse, NY, USA

    B. A. Blachman & D. M. Tangel

  2. University of Illinois at Chicago, USA

    E. W. Ball

  3. Syracuse City School District, USA

    R. S. Black

Authors
  1. B. A. Blachman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. W. Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. S. Black
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. M. Tangel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blachman, B.A., Ball, E.W., Black, R.S. et al. Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms. Read Writ 6, 1–18 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027275

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027275

Key words

Search

Navigation