Skip to main content
Log in

Geometry in early years: sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In early years schooling it is becoming common to propose activities that involve moving along paths, or programming robots to do so. In order to promote continuity towards the introduction of geometry in primary school, we developed a long-term teaching experiment (with 15 sessions) carried out over 4 months in a first grade classroom in northern Italy. Students were asked to program a robot to move along paths, to pretend to act as robots and to represent the sequence of commands and the resulting paths. In particular, in this teaching experiment, an overarching mathematical aim was to sow the seeds for a mathematical definition of rectangles that includes squares. Within the paradigm of semiotic mediation, we intended to foster the students’ transition from a dynamic perception of paths to seeing paths also as static wholes, boundaries of figures with sets of geometric characteristics. The students’ situated productions were collected and analysed together with the specific actions of the adults involved, aimed at fostering processes of semiotic mediation. In this paper we analyse the development of the situated texts produced by the students in relation to the pivot signs that were the beginnings of an inclusive definition of rectangles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Visual Gestalts refer to theories of visual perception, developed in Germany in the 1920s, that attempt to describe how people tend to organize visual elements into groups or unified wholes when certain principles are applied.

  2. For a similar process, see for instance the “theory of gears” as reported in Bartolini Bussi et al. (1999)

  3. We want to translate a non-existing Italian word (“quadratizzato”) invented by the students and later used as a pivot sign, so we will use a similar non-existing English word.

  4. Very early on in the activities the students argued that there needed to be four turns because “When she is finished the bee-bot needs to look the same way she started.” This argument was supported through mirroring by S and T, since it was important for the desired evolution of the network of pivot signs around the squarized O.

  5. Not all students were involved in the post-test activity because it was carried out during the final weeks of school, while various end-of-year activities were taking place. In total 7 of the 18 children were selected (2 high achievers, 3 average achievers, 2 low achievers) and assigned the post-test.

  6. This type of response was provided by the two high-achieving students and by one of the average-achieving students.

  7. This type of response was provided by the other two average-achieving students.

  8. This type of response was provided by the two low-achieving students.

  9. This convention is also a design feature in the app Mak-Trace (see Baccaglini-Frank et al. 2014).

References

  • ASPHI (2011). PerContare. http://percontare.asphi.it. Accessed 11 Sept 2014.

  • Baccaglini-Frank, A., Antonini, S., Robotti, E., & Santi, G. (2014). Juggling reference frames in the microworld Mak-Trace: The case of a student with MLD. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 2, pp. 81–88). Vancouver: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2012). The PerContare Project: Proposed teaching strategies and some developed materials. In F. Dellai, I. C. Mammarella, & A. M. Re (Eds.), International Academy for Research on Learning Disabilities 36th Annual Conference (pp. 194–196). Trento: Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Scorza, M. (2013). Preventing learning difficulties in early arithmetic: The PerContare Project. In T. Ramiro-Sànchez & M. P. Bermùdez (Eds.), Libro de Actas I Congreso Internacional de Ciencias de la Educatiòn y des Desarrollo (p. 341). Granada: Universidad de Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2013). Bambini che contano: A long term program for preschool teacher development. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2088–2097). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Baccaglini-Frank A. (2014, submitted). Using pivot signs to reach an inclusive definition of rectangles and squares. CERME 9.

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Boni, M. (2009). The early construction of mathematical meanings: Learning positional representation of numbers. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice (pp. 455–477). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Boni, M., & Ferri, F. (2007). Construction problems in primary school: A case from the geometry of circle. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 219–248). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Boni, M., Ferri, F., & Garuti, R. (1999). Early approach to theoretical thinking: Gears in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Garuti, R., Martignone, F., & Maschietto, M. (2011). Tasks for teachers in the MMLAB-ER Project. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 127–130). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746–783). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Martignone, F. (2013). Cultural issues in the communication of research on mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(1), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Sun, X., & Ramploud, A. (2013). A dialogue between cultures about task design for primary school. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Proceedings of ICMI Study 22: Task design in mathematics education (pp. 551–560). Oxford: ICMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In Frank K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research of mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2nd ed.). Charlotte: Information Age.

  • Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Zeitler Hannibal, M. A., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children’s concepts of shape. Journal for Research on Mathematics Education, 30(2), 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (2000). Basic issues for research in math ed. Proceedings of 24th PME (Vol. 1, pp. 55–69). Hiroshima, Japan.

  • Falcade, R., & Strozzi, P. (2009). Construction and representation of space in 5-year-old children. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice (pp. 499–520). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., & Nachlieli, T. (1998). Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1193–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, T. (2012). Learners’ level of understanding of the inclusion relations of quadrilaterals and prototype phenomenon. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition (pp. 70–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H. (2015). Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types of dynamic triangles: Prototypicality and inclusion. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3) (2014, this issue).

  • Koleza, E., & Giannisi, P. (2013). Kindergarten children’s reasoning about basic geometric shapes. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2118–2129). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Jenkins, M., & Osana, H. (1998). Longitudinal study of children’s reasoning about space and geometry. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. L., & Yang, K. L. (2002). Defining a rectangle under a social and practical setting by two seventh graders. ZDM, 34(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOGO Foundation (2000). A LOGO primer or what’s with the turtles? http://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/logo/turtle.html. Accessed 11 Sept 2014.

  • Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, M. A., & Fischbein, E. (1997). Defining in classroom activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIUR (2012). Istruzione. http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/web/istruzione/prot7734_12. Accessed 11 Sept 2014.

  • Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Mathematics Education Library (Vol. 17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., & Tabach, M. (2015). Early-years teachers’ concept images and concept definitions: Triangles, circles, and cylinders. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3) (2014, this issue).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to profusely thank: Roberta Munarini for offering to involve her first grade classroom in the project and for her so active collaboration in the project, together with Federica Baroni; the children in the classes and their parents; Alessandro Ramploud for the intercultural issues included in the paper; our Burmese friends, Thein Lwin and Ko Tar, who, thanks to Giuseppe Malpeli, were able to watch and comment on some of the activities reported in this paper, and initiate a programme of international friendship involving Italian and Burmese children.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria G. Bartolini Bussi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartolini Bussi, M.G., Baccaglini-Frank, A. Geometry in early years: sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles. ZDM Mathematics Education 47, 391–405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0636-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0636-5

Keywords

Navigation