Abstract
This chapter addresses children’s geometry thinking and learning in early childhood with a focus on the use of gestures. The chapter begins with the theoretical frameworks which underlie this work and some background information about geometry learning and gestures. The next parts of the chapter aim to give insight into the role of gestures in young children’s geometric thinking in different contexts. Specifically, three case studies are discussed which investigated different aspects of geometry understanding: two-dimensional shapes, composition and transformations of two-dimensional shapes and spatial concepts. Finally, a number of concluding remarks are discussed about the multiple uses and contributions of gestures in association with other semiotic resources in the evolution and communication of early understanding of shapes and space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alibali, M. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 307–331.
Allen, G. L. (2003). Gestures accompanying verbal route directions: Do they point to a new avenue for examining spatial representations? Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 259–268.
Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigacion en Mathematica Educativa, Numero especial, 267–299.
Brousseau, G. (1983): Etude de questions d’enseignement, un exemple: la géométrie. Séminaire de didactique des mathématiques et de l’informatique, (pp. 183–226). Grenoble: IMAG.
Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 269–309.
Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dindyal, J. (2015). Geometry in the early years: A commentary. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 519–529.
Duval, R. (1995). Geometrical pictures: Kinds of representation and specific processings. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 142–157). Germany: Springer.
Duval, R. (1998). Geometry from a cognitive point of view. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century (pp. 37–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Duval, R. (2014). The first crucial point in geometry learning: Visualization. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 1–28.
Ehrlich, S., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1259–1268.
Elia, I., & Evangelou, K. (2014). Gesture in a kindergarten mathematics classroom. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22, 45–66.
Elia, I., Evangelou, K., Hadjittoouli, K., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M. (2014). A kindergartner’s use of gestures when solving a geometrical problem in different spaces of constructed representation. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigacion en Matematica Educativa, 17(4–I), 199–220.
Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign and gesture. Journal of Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2, 157–180.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 1–25.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71(1), 231–239.
Graham, J. A., & Argyle, M. (1975). A cross-cultural study of the communication of extra-verbal meaning by gestures. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 57–67.
Henschen, E. (2016, July). Mathematical content of play activities in kindergarten, exemplified on blockplay activities. Poster presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, Germany.
Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 11–18.
Karsli, E. (2016, July). Young children’s embodied mathematical practices in a pre-k classroom. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, Germany.
Kita, S., & Davies, T. S. (2009). Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 761–775.
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–60.
Lavergne, S., & Maschietto, M. (2015). Articulation of spatial and geometrical knowledge in problem solving with technology at primary school. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 435–449.
Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2011). Preschool geometry. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Newcombe, N. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29–35.
Newcombe, N., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain and Education, 4(3), 102–111.
Peirce, C. S. (1931/1958). Collected papers of C. S. Peirce. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks (Eds.), (Vols. 1–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.
Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.
Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 83–96.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 111–126.
Radford, L., Bardini, C., Sabena, C., Diallo, P., & Simbagoye, A. (2005). On embodiment, artifacts, and signs: A semiotic-cultural perspective on mathematical thinking. In H. L. Chick, & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 4, pp. 113–120). Melbourne: PME.
Radford, L., & Sabena, C. (2015). The question of method in a Vygotskian semiotic approach. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 157–182). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sabena, C. (2007). Body and signs: A multimodal semiotic approach to teaching-learning processes in early calculus. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universita Degli Studi Di Torino.
Sabena, C. (2008). On the semiotics of gestures. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense.
Sabena, C. (2017). Early child spatial development: a teaching experiment with programmable robots. In G. Aldon, F. Hitt, L. Bazzini and U. Gellert (Eds.), Mathematics and Technology (pp. 13–30). Springer International Publishing.
Sabena, C., Radford, L., & Bardini. C. (2005). Synchronizing gestures, words and actions in pattern generalizations. In H. L. Chick and J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 4, pp. 129–136). Melbourne: PME.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge.
Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 225–273.
Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 319–329.
Thom, J. S. (2018). (Re)(con)figuring space: Three children’s geometric reasonings. In I. Elia, J. Mulligan, A. Anderson, A. Baccaglini-Frank and C. Benz (Eds.), Contemporary research and perspectives on early childhood mathematics education (this volume).
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Buys, K. (Eds.). (2008). Young children learn measurement and geometry. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Van Hiele, P. M. (1985). The child’s thought and geometry. In D. Geddes & R. Tischler (Eds.), English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele (pp. 243–252). Brooklyn: Brooklyn College, School of Education (Original work published 1959).
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85(3), 1062–1076.
Wagner, S., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 395–407.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.
Watanabe, S. (2016, July). Research on young children’s spatial recognition ability. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, Germany.
Yagi, S. (2016, July). An exploration of first grade students’ engagement in mathematical processes during whole group discussions. Poster presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, Germany.
Acknowledgements
A part of the work reported in this chapter was carried out in the project “The contribution of gestures in geometrical thinking development in early childhood” (2014–today) that is supported by a Program Grant from the “A.G. Leventis Foundation”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elia, I. (2018). Observing the Use of Gestures in Young Children’s Geometric Thinking. In: Elia, I., Mulligan, J., Anderson, A., Baccaglini-Frank, A., Benz, C. (eds) Contemporary Research and Perspectives on Early Childhood Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73432-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73432-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73431-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73432-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)