Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socio-economic and cultural mediators of mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the global level

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at identifying and understanding how and to what extent socioeconomic and cultural factors mediate mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education among countries. First, under the assumption that equity and quality of education are independent constructs, the construct of equity-in-quality in mathematics education is developed. Second, the 18 countries that were identified in the previous work of the author Jurdak in (Toward equity in quality in mathematics education. Springer, New York, 2009) as being diverse in mathematics education will serve as study cases to illustrate, compare, and contrast the mediatory role of socio-economic and cultural factors in mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education. The results show that the differences in mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the country level are associated with, and can be accounted for in some cases, by socioeconomic and cultural factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, A. (1985). Culture as a key theme for mathematics. In M. J. Hoines & S. Mellin-Olsen (Eds.), Mathematics and culture. Radal: Caspar Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, D. (2002). Vouchers, school choice and the access to higher education. Economic Growth Center, Yale University. http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=317964. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • d’Ambrosio, U. (2001). General remarks on ethnomathematics. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 33(3), 67–69.

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graven, M. H. (2014). Poverty, inequality and mathematics performance: the case of South Africa’s post-apartheid context. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(7 this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0566-7.

  • Jurdak, M. E. (1989). Religion and language as culture carriers and barriers in mathematics education. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Mathematics, education and society (pp. 12–14). Science and Technology Education Document Series No. 35. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Jurdak, M. E. (2009). Toward equity in quality in mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keitheile, M., & Mokubung, M. (2005). The SACMEQ II project in Botswana: A study of the conditions of schooling and the quality of education. SACMEQ Educational Policy Research Series. http://www.sacmeq.org/education-botswana.htm#reports. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • Leung, F. K. S. (2010). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: does it matter? In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 21–46). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L., & Veiga, P. (2010). Do inequalities in parents’ education play an important role in PISA students’ mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1016–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrinos, H. (2010). Private education provision and public finance, the Netherlands. Policy Research Working Paper 5185. http://library1.nida.ac.th/worldbankf/fulltext/wps05185.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • PISA. (2005). School factors related to quality and equity: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaull, N. (2012). Equity & efficiency in South African primary schools: a preliminary analysis of SACMEQ III South Africa. Master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch. http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/20184. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • Stevenson, H., Lee, S., & Stigler, J. (1986). Mathematics achievement, of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science, 231, 693–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subroto, P. (2007). Financing education sector under the current decentralized system in Indonesia: Disparities in education expenditures per student at public secondary schools. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/8317. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • UNESCO International Bureau of Education (2011). World data on education (7th edn.). http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/services/online-materials/world-data-on-education/seventh-edition-2010-11.html. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • World Bank (2007). The road not traveled: Education reform in the Middle East and North Africa. Executive summary. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMENA/Resources/EDU_Summary_ENG.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2014.

  • Yayan, B. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of mathematics achievement in the third international mathematics and science studyrepeat (timss-r). Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Jurdak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jurdak, M. Socio-economic and cultural mediators of mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the global level. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 1025–1037 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0593-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0593-z

Keywords

Navigation