Skip to main content
Log in

Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

  • Current Concept Review
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is defined as a scoliosis that starts after the age of ten and has no clear underlying disease as a reason for its development. There is, however, a disparity between the growth of the vertebral bodies anteriorly and that of the posterior elements. The vertebral bodies grow faster than the posterior elements, resulting primarily in a lordosis. The diminished dorsal growth impedes the ventrally located vertebral bodies from increasing in height, forcing them to become distorted, i.e., rotate, in order to create space for themselves. This produces a rotational lordosis. The idea of looking at it in this way dates back to Somerville in 1952. Many recent studies have confirmed this idea and have shown that the spinal canal is shorter than the anterior ligament of the vertebral bodies. In a mathematical model of the spine it was demonstrated that—although the vertebral column in humans is still predominantly loaded in an axial direction—certain segments of the human spine (especially the backward inclined segments) are subject to dorsally directed shear loads as well. In addition to the antero-posterior difference in growth, there is also a deformation of the vertebral bodies itself in 3-D. This is probably secondary and not primary effects, but this question is still under discussion. For the treatment of scoliosis, the biomechanical principles of axial and transverse forces are used. The combination of axial and transverse loads is most beneficial for all curves. The axial forces provide most of the corrective bending moment when deformity is severe, while the transverse loads take over the correcting function when deformity is mild. The deformity angle of 53° is the break-even point for the axial and transverse loads. In more severe curves transverse forces become less and less efficient, while axial forces rapidly gain more and more effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Somerville EW (1952) Rotational lordosis: the development of the single curve. J Bone Joint Surg 34-B:421–427

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickson RA, Lawton JD, Archer IA, Butt WP (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 66:8–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kouwenhoven JW, Vincken KL, Bartels LW, Castelein RM (2006) Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal spine. Spine 31(13):1467–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Janssen MMA, Kouwenhoven JW, Schlösser TPC, Viergever MA, Bartels LW, Castelein RM, Vincken KL (2011) Analysis of the preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile and adolescent spine. Spine 36(7):E486–E491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung KM, Wang T, Qiu GX, Luk KD (2008) Recent advances in the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 32(6):729–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu WC, Lam WW, Chan YL, Ng BK, Lam TP, Lee KM, Guo X, Cheng JC (2006) Relative shortening and functional tethering of spinal cord in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Study with multiplanar reformat magnetic resonance imaging and somatosensory evoked potential. Spine 31(1):E19–E25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, Kandemir U, Alanay A, Alanay Y, Acaroglu RE, Surat A (2005) The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine 30(1):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cruickshank JL, Koike M, Dickson RA (1989) Curve patterns in idiopathic scoliosis. A clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg 71:259–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deacon P, Archer IA, Dickson RA (1987) The anatomy of spinal deformity: a biomechanical analysis. Orthopedics 10:897–903

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo X, Chau W-W, Chan Y-L, Cheng JC-Y (2003) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral–membranous bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:1026–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo X, Chau W-W, Chan Y-L, Cheng J-C-Y, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2005) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—result of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth? Eur Spine J 14(9):862–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kouwenhoven JW, Castelein RM (2008) The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature. Spine 33(26):2898–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liljenqvist U, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, Link T, Steinbeck J, Halm H (2002) Analysis of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with use of magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 84:359–368

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter R (2000) Idiopathic scoliosis: the relation between the vertebral canal and the vertebral bodies. Spine 25:1360–1366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmitz A, Jäger U, König R, Kandyba J, Gieske J, Schmitt O (2001) Sagittale Cobb–Winkel–Messungen bei Skoliose mittels MR-Ganzwirbelsäulenaufnahme. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:304–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stokes IA, Windisch L (2006) Vertebral height growth predominates over intervertebral disc height growth in adolescents with scoliosis. Spine 31(14):1600–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang WJ, Hung VW, Lam TP, Ng BK, Qin L, Lee KM, Qiu Y, Cheng JC, Yeung HY (2010) The association of disproportionate skeletal growth and abnormal radius dimension ratio with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 19(5):726–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Castelein RM, van Dieen JH, Smit TH (2005) The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 65:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wever D, Veldhuizen A, Klein J, Webb P, Nijenbanning G, Cool J, Horn Jv (1999) A biomechanical analysis of the vertebral and rib deformities in structural scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8(4):p252–p260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Veldhuizen A, Wever D, Webb P (2000) The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors. Eur Spine J 9(3):p178–p184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Do T, Fras C, Burke S, Widmann R, Rawlins B, Boachie-Adjei O (2001) Clinical value of routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective study of three hundred and twenty-seven patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:577–579

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Samuelsson L, Lindell D, Kogler H (1991) Spinal cord and brain stem anomalies in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 62:403–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips WA, Hensinger RN, Kling TF Jr (1990) Management of scoliosis due to syringomyelia in childhood and adolescence. J Pediatr Orthop 10:351–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Machida M, Dubousset J, Imamura Y, Iwaya T, Yamada T, Kimura J, Toriyama S (1994) Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. SEPs in chicken with experimentally induced scoliosis and in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 14:329–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kouwenhoven JW, Bartels LW, Vincken KL, Viergever MA, Verbout AJ, Delhaas T, Castelein RM (2007) The relation between organ anatomy and pre-existent vertebral rotation in the normal spine: magnetic resonance imaging study in humans with situs inversus totalis. Spine 32(10):1123–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hefti FL, McMaster MJ (1983) The effect of the adolescent growth spurt on early posterior spinal fusion in infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 65-A:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger HJ (1989) The crankshaft phenomenon. Pediatr Orthop 9(5):541–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Parent S, Labelle H, Skalli W, Latimer B, de Guise J (2002) Morphometric analysis of anatomic scoliotic specimens. Spine 27(21):p2305–p2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. JB Lippincott Co. Philadelphia, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  30. Villemure I, Aubin C, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2002) Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. J Biomech Eng 124(6):p784–p790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huynh AM, Aubin CE, Rajwani T, Bagnall KM, Villemure I (2007) Pedicle growth asymmetry as a cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 16(4):523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hasler CC, Hefti F, Büchler P (2010) Coronal plane segmental flexibility in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessed by fulcrum-bending radiographs. Eur Spine J 19(5):732–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest or funding sources to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fritz Hefti.

About this article

Cite this article

Hefti, F. Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). J Child Orthop 7, 17–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0460-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0460-9

Keywords

Navigation