Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is defined as a scoliosis that starts after the age of ten and has no clear underlying disease as a reason for its development. There is, however, a disparity between the growth of the vertebral bodies anteriorly and that of the posterior elements. The vertebral bodies grow faster than the posterior elements, resulting primarily in a lordosis. The diminished dorsal growth impedes the ventrally located vertebral bodies from increasing in height, forcing them to become distorted, i.e., rotate, in order to create space for themselves. This produces a rotational lordosis. The idea of looking at it in this way dates back to Somerville in 1952. Many recent studies have confirmed this idea and have shown that the spinal canal is shorter than the anterior ligament of the vertebral bodies. In a mathematical model of the spine it was demonstrated that—although the vertebral column in humans is still predominantly loaded in an axial direction—certain segments of the human spine (especially the backward inclined segments) are subject to dorsally directed shear loads as well. In addition to the antero-posterior difference in growth, there is also a deformation of the vertebral bodies itself in 3-D. This is probably secondary and not primary effects, but this question is still under discussion. For the treatment of scoliosis, the biomechanical principles of axial and transverse forces are used. The combination of axial and transverse loads is most beneficial for all curves. The axial forces provide most of the corrective bending moment when deformity is severe, while the transverse loads take over the correcting function when deformity is mild. The deformity angle of 53° is the break-even point for the axial and transverse loads. In more severe curves transverse forces become less and less efficient, while axial forces rapidly gain more and more effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Somerville EW (1952) Rotational lordosis: the development of the single curve. J Bone Joint Surg 34-B:421–427
Dickson RA, Lawton JD, Archer IA, Butt WP (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 66:8–15
Kouwenhoven JW, Vincken KL, Bartels LW, Castelein RM (2006) Analysis of preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal spine. Spine 31(13):1467–1472
Janssen MMA, Kouwenhoven JW, Schlösser TPC, Viergever MA, Bartels LW, Castelein RM, Vincken KL (2011) Analysis of the preexistent vertebral rotation in the normal infantile, juvenile and adolescent spine. Spine 36(7):E486–E491
Cheung KM, Wang T, Qiu GX, Luk KD (2008) Recent advances in the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 32(6):729–734
Chu WC, Lam WW, Chan YL, Ng BK, Lam TP, Lee KM, Guo X, Cheng JC (2006) Relative shortening and functional tethering of spinal cord in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Study with multiplanar reformat magnetic resonance imaging and somatosensory evoked potential. Spine 31(1):E19–E25
Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, Kandemir U, Alanay A, Alanay Y, Acaroglu RE, Surat A (2005) The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine 30(1):93–100
Cruickshank JL, Koike M, Dickson RA (1989) Curve patterns in idiopathic scoliosis. A clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg 71:259–263
Deacon P, Archer IA, Dickson RA (1987) The anatomy of spinal deformity: a biomechanical analysis. Orthopedics 10:897–903
Guo X, Chau W-W, Chan Y-L, Cheng JC-Y (2003) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral–membranous bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:1026–1031
Guo X, Chau W-W, Chan Y-L, Cheng J-C-Y, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2005) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—result of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth? Eur Spine J 14(9):862–873
Kouwenhoven JW, Castelein RM (2008) The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature. Spine 33(26):2898–2908
Liljenqvist U, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, Link T, Steinbeck J, Halm H (2002) Analysis of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with use of magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 84:359–368
Porter R (2000) Idiopathic scoliosis: the relation between the vertebral canal and the vertebral bodies. Spine 25:1360–1366
Schmitz A, Jäger U, König R, Kandyba J, Gieske J, Schmitt O (2001) Sagittale Cobb–Winkel–Messungen bei Skoliose mittels MR-Ganzwirbelsäulenaufnahme. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:304–307
Stokes IA, Windisch L (2006) Vertebral height growth predominates over intervertebral disc height growth in adolescents with scoliosis. Spine 31(14):1600–1604
Wang WJ, Hung VW, Lam TP, Ng BK, Qin L, Lee KM, Qiu Y, Cheng JC, Yeung HY (2010) The association of disproportionate skeletal growth and abnormal radius dimension ratio with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 19(5):726–731
Castelein RM, van Dieen JH, Smit TH (2005) The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 65:501–508
Wever D, Veldhuizen A, Klein J, Webb P, Nijenbanning G, Cool J, Horn Jv (1999) A biomechanical analysis of the vertebral and rib deformities in structural scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8(4):p252–p260
Veldhuizen A, Wever D, Webb P (2000) The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors. Eur Spine J 9(3):p178–p184
Do T, Fras C, Burke S, Widmann R, Rawlins B, Boachie-Adjei O (2001) Clinical value of routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective study of three hundred and twenty-seven patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:577–579
Samuelsson L, Lindell D, Kogler H (1991) Spinal cord and brain stem anomalies in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 62:403–406
Phillips WA, Hensinger RN, Kling TF Jr (1990) Management of scoliosis due to syringomyelia in childhood and adolescence. J Pediatr Orthop 10:351–354
Machida M, Dubousset J, Imamura Y, Iwaya T, Yamada T, Kimura J, Toriyama S (1994) Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. SEPs in chicken with experimentally induced scoliosis and in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 14:329–335
Kouwenhoven JW, Bartels LW, Vincken KL, Viergever MA, Verbout AJ, Delhaas T, Castelein RM (2007) The relation between organ anatomy and pre-existent vertebral rotation in the normal spine: magnetic resonance imaging study in humans with situs inversus totalis. Spine 32(10):1123–1128
Hefti FL, McMaster MJ (1983) The effect of the adolescent growth spurt on early posterior spinal fusion in infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 65-A:247–254
Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shufflebarger HJ (1989) The crankshaft phenomenon. Pediatr Orthop 9(5):541–550
Parent S, Labelle H, Skalli W, Latimer B, de Guise J (2002) Morphometric analysis of anatomic scoliotic specimens. Spine 27(21):p2305–p2311
White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. JB Lippincott Co. Philadelphia, Toronto
Villemure I, Aubin C, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2002) Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. J Biomech Eng 124(6):p784–p790
Huynh AM, Aubin CE, Rajwani T, Bagnall KM, Villemure I (2007) Pedicle growth asymmetry as a cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 16(4):523–529
Hasler CC, Hefti F, Büchler P (2010) Coronal plane segmental flexibility in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessed by fulcrum-bending radiographs. Eur Spine J 19(5):732–738
Conflict of interest
There are no conflict of interest or funding sources to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Hefti, F. Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). J Child Orthop 7, 17–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0460-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0460-9