Abstract
In continuous formations, the rock properties and the state of in situ stresses control the propagation direction of an induced hydraulic fracture (HF) and its geometry. The present study succinctly reviews more than a hundred scientific papers that have deeply explored hydraulic fracture propagation from the rock mechanical perspective and summarizes the current state of knowledge on the propagation of hydraulic fractures. These studies fall into three major categories of field, experimental, and numerical studies. It was found that numerical simulations are the most common methods for studying hydraulic fracture propagation, while field and analytical studies are the least-used methods because of their technical complications and practical limitations. One of the most efficient methods for the numerical simulation that has been adopted by numerous researches from around the world in recent years is the Lattice simulation approach. This method is a particle-based model and uses the Distinct Element Method. Since the Lattice simulation presents higher accuracy and computational efficiency over the existing methods to simulate complex reservoir conditions, the current review particularly focuses on this method and also discusses the functionality of the recently introduced XSite simulation package. The results from this work demonstrate the superior ability of the Lattice simulation and XSite package in modeling different propagation regimes, geometry, and growth of the HF. Moreover, the authors simulated the interaction mode of hydraulic and natural fractures based on two significant parameters of the phenomenon, namely “angle of approach” and “in situ differential stress”, and verified the results with the Blanton criteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Montgomery CT, Smith MB (2010) Hydraulic fracturing: history of an enduring technology. J Petrol Technol 62(12):26–40
Weng X (2015) Modeling of complex hydraulic fractures in naturally fractured formation. J Unconvention Oil Gas Res 9:114–135
Rodgerson JL (2000) Impact of natural fractures in hydraulic fracturing of tight gas sands. In: SPE Permian basin oil and gas recovery conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Dehghan AN, Goshtasbi K, Ahangari K, Jin Y (2015) Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracture propagation in fractured blocks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(3):887–895
Sarmadivaleh M, Rasouli V, Shihab NK (2011) Hydraulic fracturing in an unconventional naturally fractured reservoir: a numerical and experimental study. The APPEA Journal 51(1):507–518
Fast R, Murer A, Timmer R (1994) Description and analysis of cored hydraulic fractures, Lost Hills field, Kern County, California. SPE Prod Facilities 9(02):107–114
Warpinski N, Lorenz J, Branagan P, Myal F, Gall B (1993) Examination of a cored hydraulic fracture in a deep gas well (includes associated papers 26302 and 26946). SPE Prod Facil 8(03):150–158
Behrmann L, Elbel J (1991) Effect of perforations on fracture initiation. J Petrol Technol 43(05):608–615
De Pater C, Weijers L, Savic M, Wolf K, Van Den Hoek P, Barr D (1994) Experimental study of nonlinear effects in hydraulic fracture propagation (includes associated papers 29225 and 29687). SPE Prod Facil 9(04):239–246
Doe TW, Boyce G (1989) Orientation of hydraulic fractures in salt under hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic stresses. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abst 6:605–611
Hallam S, Last N (1991) Geometry of hydraulic fractures from modestly deviated wellbores. J Petrol Technol 43(06):742–748
Weijers L, De Pater C (1994) Interaction and link-up of hydraulic starter fractures close to a perforated wellbore. In: Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Settgast RR, Fu P, Walsh SD, White JA, Annavarapu C, Ryerson FJ (2017) A fully coupled method for massively parallel simulation of hydraulically driven fractures in 3-dimensions. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 41(5):627–653
Hopkins C, Frantz Jr J, Hill D, Zamora F (1995) Estimating fracture geometry in the naturally fractured Antrim Shale. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Warpinski NR, Moschovidis Z, Parker C, Abou-Sayed I (1994) Comparison study of hydraulic fracturing models—test case: GRI staged field Experiment No 3 (includes associated paper 28158). SPE Prod Facilities 9(01):7–16
Cipolla CL (2009) Modeling production and evaluating fracture performance in unconventional gas reservoirs. J Petrol Technol 61(09):84–90
Gale JF, Reed RM, Holder J (2007) Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments. AAPG Bull 91(4):603–622
Grieser WV, Wheaton WE, Magness WD, Blauch ME, Loghry R (2007) Surface reactive fluid’s effect on shale. In: Production and Operations Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Huang J, Safari R, Burns K, Geldmacher I, Mutlu U, McClure M, Jackson S (2014) Natural-hydraulic fracture interaction: Microseismic observations and geomechanical predictions. In: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 25–27 August 2014. Society of exploration geophysicists, American association of petroleum, pp 1684–1705
Kaufman PB, Penny GS, Paktinat J (2008) Critical evaluation of additives used in shale slickwater fracs. In: SPE Shale Gas Production Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Pursley JT, Penny GS, Benton JH, Greene DT, Nordlander GS, McDougall MA, Crafton JW (2007) Field case studies of completion fluids to enhance oil and gas production in depleted unconventional reservoirs. In: Rocky mountain oil & gas technology symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Jeffrey R, Zhang X, Bunger A (2010) Hydraulic fracturing of naturally fractured reservoirs. In: Thirty-Fifth Workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, pp 1–3
Sun J, Schechter D (2015) Investigating the effect of improved fracture conductivity on production performance of hydraulically fractured wells: field-case studies and numerical simulations. J Can Pet Technol 54(06):442–449
Lamont N, Jessen F (1963) The effects of existing fractures in rocks on the extension of hydraulic fractures. J Petrol Technol 15(02):203–209
Yasin Q, Sohail GM, Khalid P, Baklouti S, Du Q (2020) Application of machine learning tool to predict the porosity of clastic depositional system, Indus Basin, Pakistan. J Petrol Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107975
Daneshy AA (1974) Hydraulic fracture propagation in the presence of planes of weakness. In: SPE European spring meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers
R Feng MS (2019) An integrated fracturing pressure diagnostic and CT scan approach for hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation. Paper presented at the 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition
Blanton TL (1982) An experimental study of interaction between hydraulically induced and pre-existing fractures. In: SPE unconventional gas recovery symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Blair S, Thorpe R, Heuze F (1990) Propagation of fluid-driven fractures in jointed rock. Part 2—physical tests on blocks with an interface or lens. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 4:255–268
Blair SC, Thorpe RK, Heuze F, Shaffer R (1989) Laboratory observations of the effect of geologic discontinuities on hydrofracture propagation. In: The 30th US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association
Chudnovsky A, Fan J, Shulkin Y, Dudley J, Nichols W, Wong G (2001) Hydraulic fracture containment in layered media, experiment and computer simulation. In: DC Rocks 2001, The 38th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association
Zhou J, Xue C (2011) Experimental investigation of fracture interaction between natural fractures and hydraulic fracture in naturally fractured reservoirs. In: SPE Europec/Eage annual conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
El Rabaa W (1989) Experimental study of hydraulic fracture geometry initiated from horizontal wells. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Rahman M, Hossain M, Crosby D, Rahman M, Rahman S (2002) Analytical, numerical and experimental investigations of transverse fracture propagation from horizontal wells. J Petrol Sci Eng 35(3–4):127–150
Li X, Xiao W, Qu Z, Guo T, Li J, Zhang W, Tian Y (2018) Rules of fracture propagation of hydraulic fracturing in radial well based on XFEM. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 8(4):1547–1557
Renshaw C, Pollard D (1995) An experimentally verified criterion for propagation across unbounded frictional interfaces in brittle, linear elastic materials. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstracts 3:237–249
Gu H, Weng X (2010) Criterion for fractures crossing frictional interfaces at non-orthogonal angles. In: 44th US rock mechanics symposium and 5th US-Canada rock mechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Rasouli V, Sarmadivaleh M, Nabipour A (2011) Some challenges in hydraulic fracturing of tight gas reservoirs: an experimental study. APPEA J 51(1):499–506
Rasouli V (2012) Hydraulic fracturing for in situ stress measurements-a simulation and experimental study. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, pp 239–246
Alabbad EA, Olson JE (2016) Examining the geomechanical implicaitons of pre-existing fractures and simultaneous-multi-fracturing completions on hydraulic fractures: experimental insights into fracturing unconventional formations. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Kolawole O, Ispas I (2019) How hydraulic fractures interact with natural fractures: a review and new observations. In: 53rd US Rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Lee HP, Olson JE, Holder J, Gale JF, Myers RD (2015) The interaction of propagating opening mode fractures with preexisting discontinuities in shale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120(1):169–181
Sarmadivaleh M, Rasouli V (2015) Test design and sample preparation procedure for experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing interaction modes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(1):93–105
Casas LA, Miskimins JL, Black AD, Green SJ (2006) Laboratory hydraulic fracturing test on a rock with artificial discontinuities. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Xing P, Yoshioka K, Adachi J, El-Fayoumi A, Damjanac B, Bunger AP (2018) Lattice simulation of laboratory hydraulic fracture containment in layered reservoirs. Comput Geotech 100:62–75
Meyer BR, Bazan LW (2011) A discrete fracture network model for hydraulically induced fractures-theory, parametric and case studies. In: SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Carrier B, Granet S (2012) Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracture problem in permeable medium using cohesive zone model. Eng Fract Mech 79:312–328
Halleck P (1994) Advances in understanding perforator penetration and flow performance. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson
Pucknell J, Behrmann L (1991) An investigation of the damaged zone created by perforating. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Asadi M, Preston FW (1994) Characterization of the jet perforation crushed zone by SEM and image analysis. SPE Formation Eval 9(02):135–139
Fallahzadeh S, Rasouli V, Sarmadivaleh M (2015) An investigation of hydraulic fracturing initiation and near-wellbore propagation from perforated boreholes in tight formations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(2):573–584
Kumari W, Ranjith P, Perera M, Li X, Li L, Chen B, Isaka BA, De Silva V (2018) Hydraulic fracturing under high temperature and pressure conditions with micro CT applications: geothermal energy from hot dry rocks. Fuel 230:138–154
Ning L, Shicheng Z, Xinfang M, Sihai L, Zhaopeng Z, Yushi Z (2019) Temperature-dependency of mechanical properties of hydraulic fracture surface and its influence on conductivity: an experimental study for development of geothermal energy. In: ARMA-CUPB Geothermal International Conference. American Rock Mechanics Association
Sneddon I, Elliot H (1946) The opening of a Griffith crack under internal pressure. Q Appl Math 4(3):262–267
Perkins T, Kern L (1961) Widths of hydraulic fractures. J Petrol Technol 13(09):937–949
Geertsma J, De Klerk F (1969) A rapid method of predicting width and extent of hydraulically induced fractures. J Pet Technol 21(12):1571–1581
Advani S, Lee T, Lee J (1990) Three-dimensional modeling of hydraulic fractures in layered media: part I—finite element formulations
Lee T, Advani S, Lee J (1990) Three-dimensional modeling of hydraulic fractures in layered media: Part II—calibrations, Parametric Sensitivity and Field Simulations
Adachi J, Siebrits E, Peirce A, Desroches J (2007) Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(5):739–757
Siebrits E, Peirce AP (2002) An efficient multi-layer planar 3D fracture growth algorithm using a fixed mesh approach. Int J Numer Meth Eng 53(3):691–717
Masoomi R, Viktorovich DS (2017) Simulation and optimization of the hydraulic fracturing operation in a heavy oil reservoir in southern Iran. J Eng Sci Technol 12:241–255
Palmer ID, Carroll H Jr (1983) Three-dimensional hydraulic fracture propagation in the presence of stress variations. Soc Petrol Eng J 23(06):870–878
Settari A, Cleary MP (1986) Development and testing of a pseudo-three-dimensional model of hydraulic fracture geometry. SPE Prod Eng 1(06):449–466
Abdollahipour A, Marji MF, Bafghi AY, Gholamnejad J (2016) DEM simulation of confining pressure effects on crack opening displacement in hydraulic fracturing. Int J Mining Sci Technol 26(4):557–561
Damjanac B, Cundall P (2016) Application of distinct element methods to simulation of hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured reservoirs. Comput Geotech 71:283–294
Gil I, Nagel N, Sanchez-Nagel M, Damjanac B (2011) The effect of operational parameters on hydraulic fracture propagation in naturally fractured reservoirs-getting control of the fracture optimization process. In: 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Thallak S, Rothenburg L, Dusseault M (1991) Simulation of multiple hydraulic fractures in a discrete element system. In: The 32nd US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association
Yushi Z, Xinfang M, Shicheng Z, Tong Z, Han L (2016) Numerical investigation into the influence of bedding plane on hydraulic fracture network propagation in shale formations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(9):3597–3614
Zhao X, Young R (2009) Numerical simulation of seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured reservoirs. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Zheng Y, Liu J, Zhang B (2019) An investigation into the effects of weak interfaces on fracture height containment in hydraulic fracturing. Energies 12(17):3245
Golsanami N, Sun J, Liu Y, Yan W, Lianjun C, Jiang L, Dong H, Zong C, Wang H (2019) Distinguishing fractures from matrix pores based on the practical application of rock physics inversion and NMR data: a case study from an unconventional coal reservoir in China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 65:145–167
Golsanami N, Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi A, Erfani A (2015) Synthesis of capillary pressure curves from post-stack seismic data with the use of intelligent estimators: a case study from the Iranian part of the South Pars gas field, Persian Gulf Basin. J Appl Geophys 112:215–225
Yan W, Sun J, Zhang J, Golsanami N, Hao S (2016) A novel method for estimation of remaining oil saturations in water-flooded layers. Interpretation 5(1):SB9–SB23
Zou Y, Zhang S, Ma X, Zhou T, Zeng B (2016) Numerical investigation of hydraulic fracture network propagation in naturally fractured shale formations. J Struct Geol 84:1–13
Nagel N, Sanchez-Nagel M, Garcia X, Lee B (2012) A numerical evaluation of the geomechanical interactions between a hydraulic fracture stimulation and a natural fracture system. In: 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Guo T, Zhang S, Zou Y, Xiao B (2015) Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in shale gas reservoir. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 26:847–856
Li J, Dong S, Hua W, Li X, Pan X (2019) Numerical investigation of hydraulic fracture propagation based on cohesive zone model in naturally fractured formations. Processes 7(1):28
Rahman M, Aghighi MA, Ravoof SA, Syed AH (2010) Effect of natural fracture on hydraulic fracture propagation in naturally fractured geothermal reservoirs. The World Geothermal CongressBali, Indonesia
Memon A, Li A, Jacqueline N, Kashif M, Ma M (2020) Study of gas sorption, stress effects and analysis of effective porosity and permeability for shale gas reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 193:107370
Memon A, Li A, Muther T, Ren X (2020) An experimental study of gas sorption, adsorbed and sorbed porosity and their impact on shale gas in place calculations. J Porous Media 23(10):985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1615/JPorMedia.2020033387
Memo A, Li A, Memon BS et al (2020) Gas adsorption and controlling factors of shale: review, application, comparison and challenges. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09738-9
Damjanac B, Gil I, Pierce M, Sanchez M, Van As A, McLennan J (2010) A new approach to hydraulic fracturing modeling in naturally fractured reservoirs. In: 44th US rock mechanics symposium and 5th US-Canada rock mechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Huaimin D, Jianmeng S, Likai C, Naser G, Weichao Y (2019) Characteristics of the pore structure of natural gas hydrate reservoir in the Qilian Mountain Permafrost, Northwest China. J Appl Geophys 164:153–159
Dong H, Sun J, Arif M, Golsanami N, Yan W, Zhang Y (2020) A novel hybrid method for gas hydrate filling modes identification via digital rock. Mar Petrol Geol 115:104255
Dong H, Sun J, Golsanami N, Cui L, Jiang L, Yan G, Yan W, Li Y (2018) A method to construct high-precision complex pore digital rock. J Geophys Eng 15 (6):2695–2703
Nagel NB, Gil I, Sanchez-Nagel M, Damjanac B (2011) Simulating hydraulic fracturing in real fractured rocks-overcjavascript: Iterm () oming the limits of pseudo3D models. In: SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Zou Y, Ma X, Zhang S (2019) Numerical modeling of fracture propagation during temporary-plugging fracturing. SPE J
Sarmadivaleh M (2012) Experimental and numerical study of interaction of a pre-existing natural interface and an induced hydraulic fracture. Curtin University, Perth
Sarmadivaleh M, Rasouli V, Nabipour A (2011) A PFC2D simulation of hydraulic fracture and natural interface interaction. In: Continuum and distinct element numerical modeling in geomechanics—2011. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international FLAC/DEM symposium, Melbourne. pp 14–16
Zhang L, Zhou J, Han Z (2017) Hydraulic fracturing process by using a modified two-dimensional particle flow code-case study. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn Int J 17(1):13–26
Zhou J, Zhang L, Braun A, Han Z (2017) Investigation of processes of interaction between hydraulic and natural fractures by PFC modeling comparing against laboratory experiments and analytical models. Energies 10(7):1001
Fatahi H, Hossain MM, Sarmadivaleh M (2017) Numerical and experimental investigation of the interaction of natural and propagated hydraulic fracture. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 37:409–424
Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 46(1):131–150
Chen Z, Bunger A, Zhang X, Jeffrey RG (2009) Cohesive zone finite element-based modeling of hydraulic fractures. Acta Mech Solida Sin 22(5):443–452
Martha LF, Wawrzynek PA, Ingraffea AR (1993) Arbitrary crack representation using solid modeling. Eng Comput 9(2):63–82
Pak A, Chan D (2008) Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracturing in oil sands
Bao J, Fathi E, Ameri S (2014) A coupled finite element method for the numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing with a condensation technique. Eng Fract Mech 131:269–281
Sukumar N, Moës N, Moran B, Belytschko T (2000) Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modelling. Int J Numer Meth Eng 48(11):1549–1570
Taleghani AD, Olson JE (2009) Analysis of multistranded hydraulic fracture Propagation: an improved model for the interaction between induced and natural fractures. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Wang H (2015) Numerical modeling of non-planar hydraulic fracture propagation in brittle and ductile rocks using XFEM with cohesive zone method. J Petrol Sci Eng 135:127–140
Dahi Taleghani A (2009) Analysis of hydraulic fracture propagation in fractured reservoirs: an improved model for the interaction between induced and natural fractures
Shi F, Wang X, Liu C, Liu H, Wu H (2017) An XFEM-based method with reduction technique for modeling hydraulic fracture propagation in formations containing frictional natural fractures. Eng Fract Mech 173:64–90
Dehghan AN, Goshtasbi K, Ahangari K, Jin Y, Bahmani A (2017) 3D numerical modeling of the propagation of hydraulic fracture at its intersection with natural (pre-existing) fracture. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(2):367–386
Tian W, Li P, Dong Y, Lu Z, Lu D (2019) Numerical simulation of sequential, alternate and modified zipper hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells using XFEM. J Petrol Sci Eng 183:106251
Dong X, Shen L, Zhao J, Liu X, Sun Y, Golsanami N, Wang F, Bi H, Zitha P (2020) A novel method to evaluate cleaning quality of oil in shale using pyrolysis pyrogram. Energy Sci Eng 8(5):1693–1704
Marji MF (2014) Numerical analysis of quasi-static crack branching in brittle solids by a modified displacement discontinuity method. Int J Solids Struct 51(9):1716–1736
Marji MF (2015) Simulation of crack coalescence mechanism underneath single and double disc cutters by higher order displacement discontinuity method. J Central South Univ 22(3):1045–1054
Zhang Z, Li X, He J, Wu Y, Zhang B (2015) Numerical analysis on the stability of hydraulic fracture propagation. Energies 8(9):9860–9877
Zeng Q, Yao J (2016) Numerical simulation of fracture network generation in naturally fractured reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 30:430–443
Dharmendra KGA (2018) Three-dimensional poroelastic modeling of multiple hydraulic fracture propagation from horizontal wells. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 105:192–209
Tang J, Zuo L, Xiao L, Wu K, Qian B, Yin C, Ehlig-Economides C, You X (2019) A 3-D Hydraulic fracture propagation model applied for multiple-layered formation. In: International petroleum technology conference
Zheng Y, Liu J, Lei Y (2019) The propagation behavior of hydraulic fracture in rock mass with cemented joints. Geofluids 2019:1–15
Huang L, Liu J, Zhang F, Dontsov E, Damjanac B (2019) Exploring the influence of rock inherent heterogeneity and grain size on hydraulic fracturing using discrete element modeling. Int J Solids Struct 176:207–220
Ben Y, Wang Y, Shi G (2013) Challenges of simulating hydraulic fracturing with DDA. In: ISRM SINOROCK 2013. International society for rock mechanics and rock engineering
Zia H, Lecampion B (2019) PyFrac: A planar 3D hydraulic fracture simulator. arXiv:190810788
Garagash DI (2019) Cohesive-zone effects in hydraulic fracture propagation. J Mech Phys Solids 133:103727
Stevens DJ, Krauthammer T (1988) A finite difference/finite element approach to dynamic soil-structure interaction modelling. Comput Struct 29(2):199–205
Zhang X, Jeffrey RG, Thiercelin M (2007) Deflection and propagation of fluid-driven fractures at frictional bedding interfaces: a numerical investigation. J Struct Geol 29(3):396–410
Zhang X, Jeffrey RG, Thiercelin M (2008) Escape of fluid-driven fractures from frictional bedding interfaces: a numerical study. J Struct Geol 30(4):478–490
Janiszewski M, Shen B, Rinne M (2019) Simulation of the interactions between hydraulic and natural fractures using a fracture mechanics approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11(6):1138–1150
Wu Z, Sun H, Wong LNY (2019) A cohesive element-based numerical manifold method for hydraulic fracturing modelling with voronoi grains. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(7):2335–2359
Blanton TL (1986) Propagation of hydraulically and dynamically induced fractures in naturally fractured reservoirs. In: SPE unconventional gas technology symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Pande G, Beer G, Williams J (1990) Numerical methods in rock mechanics
Jiang L, Kong P, Zhang P, Shu J, Wang Q, Chen L, Wu Q (2020) Dynamic analysis of the rock burst potential of a longwall panel intersecting with a fault. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(4):1737–1754
Cundall PA (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive, large-scale movement in blocky rock system. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on rock mechanics
Neto LB, Kotousov A (2012) Residual opening of hydraulically stimulated fractures filled with granular particles. J Petrol Sci Eng 100:24–29
Cundall PA, Strack OD (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65
Itasca Consulting Group M (2011–2013) “HF Simulator, Version 1.9., User’s Guide.”
Damjanac B, Detournay C, Cundall P, Purvance M, Hazzard J (2011) XSite- Description of formulation. ITASCA Consulting Group., Inc., Minneapolis
Zhang F, Damjanac B, Maxwell S (2019) Investigating hydraulic fracturing complexity in naturally fractured rock masses using fully coupled multiscale numerical modeling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(12):5137–5160
Badrouchi F, Wan X, Bouchakour I, Akash O, Rasouli V, Damjanac B (2019) Lattice simulation of fracture propagation in the Bakken formation. In: 53rd US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association
Djabelkhir N, Song X, Wan X, Akash O, Rasouli V, Damjanac B (2019) Notch driven hydraulic fracturing in open hole completions: numerical simulations of lab experiments. In: 53rd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Wan X, Rasouli V, Damjanac B, Torres M, Qiu D (2019) Numerical simulation of integrated hydraulic fracturing, production and refracturing treatments in the Bakken formation. In: 53rd US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Bakhshi E, Rasouli V, Ghorbani A, Fatehi Marji M (2019) Hydraulic fracture propagation: analytical solutions versus Lattice simulations. J Mining Environ 10(2):451–464
Bakhshi E, Rasouli V, Ghorbani A, Fatehi Marji M (2019) Lattice numerical simulations of hydraulic fractures interacting with oblique natural interfaces. Int J Mining Geo-Eng 53(1):83–89
Bakhshi E, Rasouli V, Ghorbani A, Marji MF, Damjanac B, Wan X (2019) Lattice numerical simulations of lab-scale hydraulic fracture and natural interface interaction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(5):1315–1337
Bakhshi E (2019) Hydraulic fracturing simulation in fractured carbonate formations. PhD thesis
Liu X, Qu Z, Guo T, Sun Y, Wang Z, Bakhshi E (2019) Numerical simulation of non-planar fracture propagation in multi-cluster fracturing with natural fractures based on Lattice methods. Eng Fract Mech 220:106625
Akash O, Vamegh R, Djabelkhir N, Badrouchi F, Damjanac B, Zhang F (2019) Lattice simulations of hydraulic fracture reorientation from perforations. In: 53rd US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
Wan X, Rasouli V, Damjanac B, Pu H (2020) Lattice simulation of hydraulic fracture containment in the North Perth Basin. J Pet Sci Eng 188:106904
Zhou J, Zhang L, Han Z (2017) Hydraulic fracturing process by using a modified two-dimensional particle flow code-method and validation. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn Int J 17(1):52–62
Jiang L, Zhao Y, Golsanami N, Chen L, Yan W (2020) A novel type of neural networks for feature engineering of geological data: Case studies of coal and gas hydrate-bearing sediments. Geosci Front 11(5):1511–1531
Dong H, Sun J, Zhu J, Liu L, Lin Z, Golsanami N, Cui L, Yan W (2019) Developing a new hydrate saturation calculation model for hydrate-bearing sediments. Fuel 248:27–37
Qiang Z, Yasin Q, Golsanami N, Du Q (2020) Prediction of reservoir quality from log-core and seismic inversion analysis with an artificial neural network: a case study from the sawan gas field, Pakistan. Energies 13(2):486
Administration USEI (2016) U.S. Energy Information Administration
Global Market Insights I (2019) Hydraulic fracturing market by well, technology & application to 2024. Global Market Insights, Inc
Harris AE, Hopkinson L, Soeder DJ (2016) Developing monitoring plans to detect spills related to natural gas production. Environ Monit Assess 188(11):647
Ma L, Hurtado A, Eguilior S, Borrajo JFL (2019) Forecasting concentrations of organic chemicals in the vadose zone caused by spills of hydraulic fracturing wastewater. Sci Total Environ 696:133911
Cornet FH (2016) Seismic and aseismic motions generated by fluid injections. Geomech Energy Environ 5:42–54
Kinnaman TC (2011) The economic impact of shale gas extraction: a review of existing studies. Ecol Econ 70(7):1243–1249
GetNews M (2019) Hydraulic fracturing market 2019| exclusive analysis by top manufacturers, regional trends, global size, share, current scenario, opportunities and business boosting strategies till 2023
Dershowitz W, Klise K, Fox A, Takeuchi S, Uchida M (2002) Channel network and discrete fracture network modeling of hydraulic interference and tracer experiments and the prediction of phase C experiments. SKB Report IPR-02-29. Stockholm, SKB
Funding
This study was supported by China Taishan Scholar Talent Team Support Plan for Advantaged & Unique Discipline Areas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Development of the research idea: Naser Golsanami; Performing the literature search and data analysis: Elham Bakhshi; Methodology: Naser Golsanami, and Lianjun Chen; Writing-original draft preparation: Elham Bakhshi; Writing-review and editing: Naser Golsanami, and Lianjun Chen.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
The most important research studies on hydraulic fracturing since 1963 till 2020
Year | Author(s) | Main results | Method(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1963 | Lamont and Jessen | A hydraulic fracture could expand across natural fractures with different width and orientation | Experimental |
1974 | Daneshy | Comparatively small flaws, whether open or closed, were a locally influenced induced hydraulic fracture and were unable to change their overall orientation | Experimental |
1982 | Blanton | Under high differential stresses and high angles of approach, hydraulic induced fractures would cross pre-existing fractures | Experimental |
1983 | Palmer and Carroll Jr | Analyzed the complexity of hydraulic fracturing propagation in the presence of different rock types and in situ stresses | Numerical |
1986 | Settari and Cleary | Analyzed the complexity of hydraulic fracturing propagation in the presence of different rock types and in situ stresses | Numerical |
1988 | Stevens | Compared FDM and FEM, and concluded using FDM would reduce the cost and computational time | Numerical |
1989 | Doe and Boyce | The significant importance of deviated stresses in fracture geometry was highlighted | Experimental |
1989 | El Rabaa | Fracture geometry near horizontal wells is controlled by well deviation and length of the perforated interval | Experimental |
1990 | Advani et al. | Developed the P3D model as an extension of the PKN model | Numerical |
1991 | Behrmann and Elbel | Bi-wings fractures occur in unsaturated blocks and multi-fractures occur in saturated blocks | Experimental |
1991 | Pucknell et al. | Investigated the damage caused by the perforation process | Experimental |
1991 | Thallak et al. | Used Flow-Coupled DEM/Simulated the two fractures initiated and propagated in a dense cohesionless granular medium under hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic stress fields | Numerical |
1993 | Warpinski, et al. | Higher pressure drops in fractures and shorter fracture lengths | Field |
1993 | Martha, et al. | Fracture reorientation modelling by FEM needs remeshing and was computationally expensive | Numerical |
1994 | Fast, et al. | Microfracture tests showed stress variations between reservoir layers were great enough to prevent fracture placement across an entire perforated interval | Field |
1994 | Warpinski, et al. | They showed only results and quantifiable comparisons | Field |
1994 | Halleck | Investigated the damage caused by the perforation process | Experimental |
1994 | Asadi, and Preston | Investigated the damage caused by the perforation process | Experimental |
1994 | De Pater, Weijers et al. | Studied nonlinear effects on hydraulic fracture propagation caused to multi fractures | Experimental |
1995 | Hopkins, et al. | Presence of contained fractures despite the lack of stress barriers and the lack of a low Young’s Modulus | Field |
1995 | Renshaw and Pollard | Derived a simple coefficient of friction criteria | Experimental Analytical |
1999 | Moës, et al. | Used FEM for crack growth without remeshing/This method allows the entire crack to be represented independently by the mesh and, therefore no need for remeshing to model the crack growth | Numerical |
2000 | Sukumar, et al. | Used XFEM for improving computational efficiency | Numerical |
2000 | Sukumar, et al. | Used FEM/Concluded great flexibility of this method in modelling, applying varied boundary conditions and modelling of cracked environments with crack geometry was evident | Numerical |
2001 | Chudnovsky, et al. | Studied hydraulic fracturing process in layered formations/Concluded the fracture geometry could be elliptical even under uniform stress conditions and with a moderate fracture toughness ratio | Experimental Numerical |
2002 | Siebrits and Peirce | Developed a planar 3D (PL3D) model. Mentioned it is more accurate than P3D | Numerical |
2002 | Rahman, et al. | Studied the propagation of transverse hydraulic fracturing from horizontal wells/Resulted that the propagation of multiple fractures requires higher net pressures than a single fracture | Experimental Numerical Analytical |
2007 | Grieser, et al. | Via increasing access to microporosity or natural fractures as well as increasing surface area, enhanced shale production was possible | Field |
2007 | Gale, Reed et al. | Natural fractures distributed in a power-law size mode and the largest fracture stayed in an open state | Field |
2007 | Pursley, Penny et al. | By analyzing the production histories, showed microemulsion additive significantly enhanced the reservoir conductivity and effective fracture length compared to the historical completions | Field |
2007 | Adachi, Siebrits et al. | Developed a planar 3D (PL3D) model, which is more accurate than P3D | Numerical |
2007 | Zhang, Jeffrey et al. | Used 2D-BEM/Considered the importance of frictional behavior at the pre-existing fracture surfaces. Frictional energy loss influences the width of HF on the two pre-existing NFs | Numerical |
2008 | Kaufman, Penny et al. | The evolvement of fractures around the main fracture could increase the regional permeability, but it also could lead to significant leak-off, which in turn can limit the development of a hydraulic fracture | Field |
2008 | Zhang, Jeffrey et al. | Used 2D-BEM/Considered the importance of frictional behavior at the pre-existing fracture surfaces | Numerical |
2008 | Pak and Chan | Used FEM/Concluded that for uncemented porous medias, a single planar fracture was unlikely to occur and a fracture zone consisting of interconnected tiny cracks should be expected | Numerical Experimental |
2009 | Cipolla | Opening or closing of pre-existing micro cracks, played an important role in production because they could change the reservoir properties | Field |
2009 | Zhao and Young | Used DEM and PFC2D for simulating HF propagation | Numerical Experimental |
2009 | Taleghani and Olson | Used XFEM/Simulated fracture reorientation and interaction between HF and NFs | Numerical |
2009 | Dahi Taleghani | Used XFEM/Considered the effect of the cohesiveness of the sealed NFs and showed the main differences between hydraulic fracturing in NF reservoirs from non-fractured reservoirs | Numerical |
2009 | Chen, Bunger et al. | Used FEM to simulate HF in real time and avoid singularity problems in classical fracture mechanics | Numerical |
2010 | Jeffrey, Zhang et al. | The mapped fracture geometry and numerical modeling of it showed that opening mode hydraulic fractures could be effectively extended into the naturally fractured rock | Field Numerical |
2010 | Gu and Weng | Developed Renshaw and Pollard criterion | Experimental Analytical |
2010 | Damjanac, Gil et al. | Used a DFN to create a Synthetic Rock Mass and PFC2D for simulations/Resulted that by changing the fluid compressibility, the geometry of induced fractures was changed | Numerical |
2010 | Rahman, Aghighi et al. | Used FEM/Concluded the angle of approach, differential stress, opening pressure, and the type of the NFs had a significant effect on crossing or opening of HF | Numerical |
2011 | Zhou and Xue | Studied the effect of changing in situ stresses/Observed three types of fracture geometry | Experimental |
2011 | Rasouli, Sarmadivaleh et al. | Studied the effect of formation texture heterogeneity and interface properties on induced fracture propagation/Showed the fracture crossed strong interface and offset in the weak interface | Experimental |
2011 | Nagel, Gil et al. | Used 3DEC DEM/Increasing injection rate, strongly caused the increase of the tensile failure | Numerical |
2011 | Gil, Nagel et al. | Used DEM and 3DEC/Simulated the effect of injection rate and fluid viscosity on HF propagation | Numerical |
2011 | Sarmadivaleh, Rasouli et al. | Used PFC2D/Highlighted the role of interfaces’ filler materials and their effective role in the interaction mechanism | Numerical Experimental |
2011 | Rasouli, et al. | Used PFC/Studied the interaction mechanisms | Numerical |
2012 | Rasouli | Used PFC2D/Studied the effect of stress anisotropy on hydraulic fracturing propagation. | Experimental Numerical |
2012 | Sarmadivaleh | Used PFC/Studied the interaction mechanisms | Numerical |
2012 | Sanchez-Nagel et al. | Used DEM/Considered the critical impact of an induced HF on the shear of the NF system | Numerical |
2013 | Ben, Wang et al. | Used DDA and a pipe network model/Concluded the in situ stresses and joint properties were the main effective parameters on HF propagation | Numerical |
2014 | Huang, Safari et al. | Their sensitivity analysis showed geomechanical models that involve complex fracture networks could be calibrated against synthetic microseismic data and helped predict reservoir response to stimulation | Field |
2014 | Marji | Used DDM/The method allows fracture reorientation under certain stress conditions | Numerical |
2014 | Bao, Fathi et al. | Used FEM/Condensation technique had a strong influence on computation costs, especially in the viscose-dominated propagation regime | Numerical |
2015 | Sun and Schechter | Because of the existence of natural fractures, the stimulated volume was increased. Also, the capability of developed meshing algorithms to accurately model fracture width and fracture geometry increased too | Field |
2015 | Lee, et al. | Showed the importance of interface filling material properties on the interaction mechanism | Experimental |
2015 | Fallahzadeh, et al. | Investigated the effect of stress anisotropy and geometry of the fracture near the wellbore | Experimental |
2015 | Guo, Zhang et al. | Used 2D-FEM/Resulted permeability and mechanical properties of natural fractures, angle of approach, the difference between horizontal stresses and flow rate were the main factors affecting HF propagation | Numerical |
2015 | Wang | Used XFEM/Simulated fracture reorientation and interaction between HF and NFs | Numerical |
2015 | Marji | Used DDM/The method allows fracture reorientation under certain stress conditions | Numerical |
2015 | Zhang, Li et al. | Used DDM/Considered the necessary conditions for stable HF propagation in unconventional resources | Numerical |
2015 | Guo, Zhang et al. | Used 2D fracture propagation Method/Demonstrated the mechanical properties and permeability of NFs, angle of approach, horizontal stress difference, viscosity, and fluid flow rates were the main parameters affecting the fracture network geometry and fracture propagation in shale gas reservoirs | Numerical |
2016 | Alabbad and Olson | Reviewed the geomechanical factors controlling interaction mechanism/Found crossing mode was largely dictated by the preexisting fractures cement fill type relative to the matrix of the host rock | Experimental |
2016 | Abdollahipour, et al. | Used DEM/Simulated the confining pressure effects on the crack opening displacement in HF process | Numerical |
2016 | Yushi, Xinfang et al. | Used DEM/Simulate HF propagation in layered shale formations/Revealed that the presence of bedding plane interfaces increased the injection pressure during fracturing | Numerical |
2016 | Damjanac and Cundall | Used DEM/Considered the SRM had an ability to solve the HF propagation/Mentioned their model could deliver a pattern of HF in intact rock or sliding and opening of pre-existing joints | Numerical |
2016 | Zou, Zhang et al. | Used 3D-DEM/The interaction between induced and NFs might change before and after plugging | Numerical |
2016 | Zeng and Yao | Used DDM/Fracture spacing and stress anisotropy were two important parameters that had a considerable effect on fracture geometry and propagation | Numerical |
2016 | Damjanac and Cundall | Used 3D-DEM HF simulator/Indicated HF simulator was a powerful 3D simulator for representing hydraulic fracturing in the jointed rock mass | Numerical |
2017 | Masoomi and Viktorovich | Used Pseudo 3D HF model (P3D) and 2D modelling of PKN, KGD and Radial models for investigating the main effective parameters on HF propagation | Numerical |
2017 | Zhou, Zhang et al. | Used PFC/Studied the interaction mechanisms | Numerical |
2017 | Dehghan, et al. | Used XFEM and ABAQUS/3D simulated HF propagation and its interaction with pre-existing NFs | Numerical |
2017 | Shi, Wang et al. | Used XFEM with reduction technique/Concluded this method could speed up the simulation considerably without decreasing the convergence or computational accuracy in iterations | Numerical |
2017 | Fatahi, Hossain et al. | Used PFC/By increasing the angle between NF and maximum horizontal stress, the possibility of crossing mode was increased. The strength of filling materials affects the possibility of cross mode. | Numerical Experimental |
2018 | Kumari, Ranjith et al. | Breakdown pressure and temperature had an opposite relationship | Experimental |
2018 | Li, Xiao et al. | Simulated HF propagation in radial well/Investigated changing in situ stress field distribution during the radial well fracturing and forming the induced stress field along the radial well at the same time | Experimental Numerical |
2018 | Xing, Yoshioka et al. | Investigated the effect of three principal stresses/Height, growth, containment, and growth along the horizontal weak interface determined the distinct regions in parametric space | Experimental Numerical |
2018 | Dharmendra K. | Used 3D-DDM/Concluded that the mechanical interactions between the fractures are the main parameters which affect the fracture network geometries | Numerical |
2018 | Li, Xiao et al. | Used 3D-XFEM/Fracture spacing is a key parameter that controlls the multiple fractures geometries | Numerical |
2019 | Ning, Shicheng et al. | Studied the temperature-dependency of mechanical properties of an HF surface and fracture conductivity | Experimental |
2019 | R Feng | Unstable initiation & propagation of HF due to extension of HF aligned to the minimum horizontal stress | Experimental |
2019 | Zheng, Liu et al. | Used DEM/Concluded the fracture height was limited by the weak joints and was controlled by parameters such as the angle between the hydraulic fractures, the interface, and the stress state | Numerical |
2019 | Zou, Ma et al. | Used 3D-DEM/Did sensitivity analysis on fluid injection pressure and horizontal differential stresses and resulted that changing injection pressure could strongly affect the HF propagation behavior | Numerical |
2019 | Li, Dong et al. | Used 2D-FEM based on the Pore Pressure Cohesive Zone (PPCZ)/Concluded that the horizontal differential stress is the most important factor for controlling the HF propagation network | Numerical |
2019 | Tian, Li et al. | Used XFEM/By comparing Sequential Fracturing, Alternate Fracturing, and the Modified Zipper Fracturing methods concluded that the effect of induced stresses on fracture propagation is lower. Also, indicated the in situ stress difference was the main controller parameter of fracture deviation | Numerical |
2019 | Janiszewski, Shen et al. | Used 2D-FRACOD/By increasing angle of approach, the crossing happened, and by decreasing the angle of approach, the crossing was reduced, and opening happened | Numerical |
2019 | Wu, Sun et al. | Used Cohesive Element-Based/Natural fracture friction coefficient affected HF propagation strongly | Numerical |
2019 | Tang, Zuo et al. | Used 3D-DDM for simulating rock deformation and FDM for modelling fluid flow along vertical fractures/Mentioned the 3D-DDM could describe the pressure gradient around fracture tips accurately | Numerical |
2019 | Zheng, Liu et al. | Used 3D-DEM/By increasing the angle of approach, crossing mode was more likely to happen | Numerical Experimental |
2019 | Huang, Liu et al. | Used 2D-DEM/Despite the weak effect of inherent heterogeneity on the HF process in the viscose dominated regime it had a stronger effect on hydraulic fracturing propagating in toughness dominated | Numerical |
2019 | Garagash | Studied cohesive-zone effects in HF propagation/In the real field, fluid lag is embedded in the fracture | Numerical |
2019 | Badrouchi, Wan et al. | Used XSite/After initiating HF at the center of the Middle Bakken, it could penetrate both the Upper and Lower Bakken Formation because of their high Young’s modulus | Numerical |
2019 | Djabelkhir, Song et al. | Used XSite)/A predefined crack led to better conditions for fracture initiation and rock breakdown | Numerical |
2019 | Wan, Rasouli et al. | Used XSite and FLAC3D/Fracture propagation caused a stress reversal regime near the HF | Numerical |
2019 | Bakhshi. E | Used XSite and compared results with lab data/The larger angle of intersection and stronger filling material will promote the crossing mode | Numerical |
2019 | Liu, Qu et al. | Used Lattice Method/In-situ stress difference and cluster spacing are the most important parameters which affect the length and geometry of HF | Numerical |
2019 | Akash, Rasouli et al. | Used XSite/Indicated that in case of orienting perforations perpendicular to the direction of minimum horizontal stress, a single wide fracture was observed | Numerical |
1990 | Blair, Thorpe et al. | Used FEM/After running true triaxial test, a single-wing fracture, propagating in a plane perpendicular to the interface was obtained | Experimental Numerical |
2019 | Bakhshi, Rasouli et al. | Used XSite/Analytical solutions were just suitable for simple cases (samples without any fractures) | Numerical |
2019 | Bakhshi, Rasouli et al. | Used XSite/By increasing the angle of approach and the strength of filling materials, the possibility of crossing mode was increased | Numerical |
2019 | Bakhshi, Rasouli et al. | Used XSite/Shear strength and stress anisotropy were the main factors affecting the interaction mechanism | Numerical |
2020 | Wan, Rasouli et al. | Used XSite/Decreasing the rock brittleness prevents fracture propagation. Also, the lower minimum horizontal stress contrast led to the fracture containment | Numerical |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bakhshi, E., Golsanami, N. & Chen, L. Numerical Modeling and Lattice Method for Characterizing Hydraulic Fracture Propagation: A Review of the Numerical, Experimental, and Field Studies. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 3329–3360 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09501-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09501-6