Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracture propagation in fractured blocks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 22 April 2015

Abstract

Natural fractures in reservoirs can be the cause of many adverse effects during hydraulic fracturing treatment. In the present paper, hydraulic fracturing tests are used to investigate the interaction of a propagating hydraulic fracture with a natural fracture in the fractured blocks. Systematic experiments were designed and performed on the cement blocks with different pre-existing fracture strikes and dips (30°, 60° and 90°). The effect of horizontal stress difference on the propagation of hydraulic fractures was also determined through a series of experiments with different values for Δσ, which were 5 and 10 MPa, respectively. Propagation arrest of the hydraulic fracture and crossing the pre-existing fracture were two dominating fracture behaviors at horizontal stress differences of 5 and 10 MPa, respectively. It was observed that both the magnitude of differential stress and the pre-existing fracture geometry can magnify the effect of a pre-existing fracture on hydraulic fracture propagation. When the horizontal differential stress is low (5 MPa), the hydraulic fracture crosses the pre-existing fracture at a high pre-existing fracture dip (90°) and at an intermediate to high pre-existing fracture strike (60°–90°), while hydraulic fracture is arrested by the opening of the pre-existing fracture at a pre-existing fracture strike (30°). Meanwhile, when the pre-existing fracture dip is low to intermediate (30°–60°) and its strike is low to high (30°–90°), hydraulic fracture is arrested by the opening and shear slippage of the pre-existing fracture in this situation. However, at a high horizontal differential stress (10 MPa), when the pre-existing fracture dip is low to high (30°–90°), the hydraulic fracture crosses the pre-existing fracture at the strike of the pre-existing fracture of 60°–90°, and when it is decreased to 30°, the hydraulic fracture is arrested by th eopening and shear slippage of the pre-existing fracture. Therefore, the pre-existing fracture’s strike and dip play a significant role in the propagation of hydraulic fracture at a low horizontal stress difference, while the role of the pre-existing fracture dip at a high horizontal stress difference is less than the pre-existing fracture strike on the propagation of hydraulic fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

μ :

Fluid viscosity, m/Lt (Pa s)

σ h :

Minimum principal stress in horizontal direction, m/Lt2 (Pa)

σ H :

Maximum principal stress in horizontal direction, m/Lt2 (Pa)

σ v :

Principal stress in vertical direction, m/Lt2 (Pa)

σ :

Horizontal stress difference, m/Lt2 (Pa)

p :

Fluid pressure, m/Lt2 (psi)

q :

Flow rate of fluid, L3/t (m3/s)

E :

Young’s modulus of elasticity, m/Lt2 (Pa)

\( \nu \) :

Poisson’s ratio

σ c :

Unconfined compressive strength, m/Lt2 (Pa)

T 0 :

Tensile strength, m/Lt2 (Pa)

k :

Permeability, L2 (m2)

ϕ :

Porosity (%)

α :

Angle of the dip, angle (°)

β :

Angle of the strike, angle (°)

\( U_{\text{m}}^{i} \) :

Maximum allowable closure for load cycle i, L (mm)

U n :

Current normal displacement, L (mm)

K n0 :

Initial normal stiffness, m/L2 t2 (Pa/mm)

σ n :

Confining stress, m/Lt2 (Pa)

References

  • Athavale AS, Miskimins JL (2008) Laboratory hydraulic fracturing tests on small homogeneous and laminated blocks. 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 2nd US-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 29 June–2 July

  • Azeemuddin M, Ghori SG, Saner S, Khan MN (2002) Injection-induced hydraulic fracturing in a naturally fractured carbonate reservoir: a case study from Saudi Arabia. SPE 73784, presented at the SPE international symposium and exhibition on formation damage control, Lafayette, 20–21 February

  • Bandis S, Barton N, Christianson M (1985) Application of a new numerical model of joint behaviour to rock mechanics problems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Rock Joints, pp 345–356

  • Beugelsdijk LJL, de Pater CJ, Sato K (2000) Experimental hydraulic fracture propagation in multi-fractured medium. SPE 59419, presented at the SPE Asia Pacific conference on integrated modeling, Yokohoma, 25–26 April

  • Blanton TL (1986) Propagation of hydraulically and dynamically induced fractures in naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE 15261, presented at the SPE/DOE unconventional gas technology symposium, Louisville, 18–21 May

  • Britt LK, Hager CJ (1994) Hydraulic fracturing in a naturally fractured reservoir. SPE 28717, presented at the SPE international petroleum conference and exhibition, Veracruz, 10–13 October

  • Brudy M, Zoback MD (1999) Drilling-induced tensile wall-fractures: implications for determination of in-situ stress orientation and magnitude. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneshy AA (1974) Hydraulic fracture propagation in the presence of planes of weakness. SPE 4852, presented at the SPE-European Spring Meeting, Amsterdam, 29–30 May

  • de Pater CJ, Cleary MP, Quinn TS, Barr DT, Johnson DE, Weijers Leen (1994) Experimental verification of dimensional analysis for hydraulic fracturing. Soc Petrol Eng Prod Facilities 1994; November:230

  • Gale JFW, Reed RM, Holder J (2007) Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments. AAPG Bull 91:603–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimson B (1967) Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks. SPE 1710, presented at the SPE third conference on rock mechanics, Austin, 25–26 January

  • Hossain MM, Rahman MK, Rahman SS (1967) A comprehensive monograph for hydraulic fracture initiation from deviated wellbores under arbitrary stress regimes. SPE 54360, presented at the SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference, Jakarta, 20–22 April

  • Hossain MM, Rahman MK, Rahman SS (2000) Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes. J Petrol Sci Eng 27:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK, Willis DG (1957) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Trans AIME 210:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont N, Jessen F (1963) The effects of existing fractures in rocks on the extension of hydraulic fractures. J Pet Technol February:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu E (2005) Effects of fracture aperture and roughness on hydraulic and mechanical properties of rocks: implication of seismic characterization of fractured reservoirs. J Geophys Eng 2:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy HD, Fehler MC (1986) Hydraulic fracturing of jointed formations. SPE 14088, presented at the SPE international meeting on petroleum engineering, Beijing, 17–20 March

  • Olson JE, Bahorich B, Holder J (2012) Examining hydraulic fracture—natural fracture interaction in hydrostone block experiments. SPE 152618, presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, 6–8 February

  • Renshaw CE, Pollard DD (1995) An experimentally verified criterion for propagation across unbonded frictional interfaces in brittle, linear elastic materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 32(3):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgerson JL (2000) Impact of natural fractures in hydraulic fracturing of tight gas sands. SPE 59540, presented at the SPE Permian basin oil and gas recovery conference, Midland, 21–23 March

  • Suarez-Rivera R, Burghardt J, Stanchits S, Edelman E, Surdi A (2013) Understanding the effect of rock fabric on fracture complexity for improving completion design and well performance. IPTC 17018, presented at the international petroleum technology conference, Beijing, 26–28 March

  • Vinod PS, Flindt ML, Card RJ, Mitchell JP (1997) Dynamic fluid-loss studies in low-permeability formations with natural fractures. SPE 37486, presented at the SPE production operations symposium, Tulsa, 9–11 March

  • Warpinski NR, Teufel LW (1987) Influence of geologic discontinuities on hydraulic fracture propagation. J Pet Technol February:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Chen M, Zhang G (2008) Analysis of fracture propagation behavior and fracture geometry using a tri-axial fracturing system in naturally fractured reservoirs. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1143–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Jin Y, Chen M (2011) Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing in random naturally fractured blocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1193–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51174217). We also acknowledge the help of Prof. Main Chen, Dr. Hou Being and Dr. Jennifer L. Miskimins (Colorado School of Mines, USA) for their consistent support, patience and guidance throughout our studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Naghi Dehghan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehghan, A.N., Goshtasbi, K., Ahangari, K. et al. Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracture propagation in fractured blocks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74, 887–895 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0665-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0665-x

Keywords

Navigation