Skip to main content
Log in

Using gluteus maximus muscle to reconstruct the anal sphincter for very low rectal cancer

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

To assess the use of gluteus maximus muscle to reconstruct the anal sphincter for very low rectal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the local recurrence and function of the new anal sphincter after operation.

Methods

Sixteen patients underwent the replacement operation, and then received biofeedback treatments 1 month after the operation. The therapeutic responses were evaluated using the Vaizey and Wexner scoring systems and vectorial manometry. The controls were 30 cases who had undergone a low anterior resection for rectal cancer and 30 healthy people.

Results

Median follow-up was 4.2 years. No local recurrence was observed. The Vaizey and Wexner scores and vectorial manometry 1 month after operation were significantly lower than those of the healthy and low anterior resection controls (P <0.001). After biofeedback treatments, the above indexes improved significantly (P <0.001), especially after 1 year (P <0.001), but still remained lower than the controls(P <0.001). The rectoanal reflex only increased to 31.3 % 1 year after operation.

Conclusion

The local recurrence after the replacement operation was low. The defecation function was poor early after operation, but increased markedly after biofeedback treatments and long-term functional exercise. This therapy can be one choice for very low rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun J, Teutner KH, Winkeltau G, et al. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1992; 163:407–412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch I, Herbst F et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg. 1994; 81:1376–1378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42:1168–1175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saito N. Ono M, Sqgito M, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47:459–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Romano G, La Torre F, Cutini G, et al. Total anorectal reconstruction with the artificial bowel sphincter: report of eight cases. A quality-of-life assessment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46:730–734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaizey CI, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, et al. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999; 44:77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fe cal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36:77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams NS, Johnston D. The quality of life after excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1983; 70:460–462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wirsching M, Drune HU. Result of psychological adjustment to long-term colostomy. Psythother Psychosom. 1975; 26:245–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Norton C, Kamm MA. Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults—a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 15:1147–1154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Solomon M, Pager CK, Rex J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of biofeedback with anal manometry, transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor retraining with digital guidance alone in the treatment of mild to moderate fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46:703–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Levy JR, et al. Biofeedback in colorectal practice: a multicenter, statewide three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:827–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sangwan YP, Solla JA. Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41:1297–1311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor BM, Beart RW Jr, Phillips SF. Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter. Astroenterology. 1984; 86:694–697.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ho YH, Tan M, Leong A, et al. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinchun Cong.

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the University Science and Technique Research Program of the Education Department of Liaoning Province (No.05L484)

About this article

Cite this article

Cong, J., Chen, C., Zhang, H. et al. Using gluteus maximus muscle to reconstruct the anal sphincter for very low rectal cancer. Chin. J. Clin. Oncol. 4, 98–102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11805-007-0098-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11805-007-0098-4

Keywords

Navigation