Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of coke properties and its blending recipe on performances of carbon anode for aluminium electrolysis

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties and blending recipe of petroleum cokes used to make high quality carbon anodes for aluminium electrolysis were studied. Three kinds of green cokes were selected for bench scale study to illustrate the effects of cokes properties and its blending recipe on anode performances. The results show that impurities derived mainly from cokes remarkably affect the CO2 reactivity and air reactivity of carbon anodes. Ca, Na and V can increase CO2 reactivity of calcined cokes but S has the contrary effect, and the cokes of high V level generally present high air reactivity. The anodes with good quality can be made by properly selecting and scientifically blending of cokes, some poor quality cokes can also be used to produce high quality anodes with a reasonable blending recipe. Na contaminated anodes have high CO2 reactivity and air reactivity, so the recycled anode butts should be well cleaned to reduce Na content before being introduced into anode production, which is especially important to the low S cokes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fischer W K, Mannweiler U, Keller F, et al. Anodes for aluminum industry [M]. 1st ed. Sierre, Switzerland: R&D Carbon Ltd, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. LIU Feng-qin. Investigation of Chinese carbon materials for the use in the production of carbon anodes for the aluminium industry: Adaptation of technologies towards systematic blending of raw materials[R]. Sierre: R&D Carbon Ltd., 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LIU Zi-bin, SHEN Hai-ping, WANG Yu-zhang. Current status of domestic petroleum coke produced by delayed coking [C]// Proceedings of 1st International Carbon Conference. Dalian: Sept. 5–8, 2004.

  4. LIU Feng-qin, YANG Hong-jie. Production technology development of carbon materials for aluminium electrolysis in China [C]// Crepeau P N. Light Metals 2003. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2001: 575–580.

    Google Scholar 

  5. LAI Yan-qing, LI Jie, Li Qing-yu, et al. Effect of aluminum-containing additives on the reactivity in air and CO2 of carbon anode for aluminum electrolysis [J]. Rare Metals, 2004, 23(2): 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rolle J G, Czikall R A. Use of coke air reactivity testing for predicting anode air reactivity [C]// Anjier J L. Light Metals 2001. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2001: 675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jufts R. Refinery considerations for the production of anode quality green coke[C] // Proceedings of 2nd International Carbon Conference. Kunming: Sept: 17–19, 2006.

  8. Meijer R, Weeda M, Kapteijn F, et al. Catalyst loss and retention during alkali-catalysed carbon gasification in CO2 [J]. Carbon, 1991, 29(7): 929–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogt F, Tonti R, Hunt M, et al. A preview of anode coke quality in 2007 [C]// Tabereaux A T. Light Metals 2004. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2004: 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engvoll M A, Øye H A, Sørlie M. Influence of bath contaminations on anode reactivity[C]. Anjier J L. Light Metals 2001. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2001: 661–668.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Houston G J, Oye H A. Consumption of anode carbon during aluminum electrolysis [J]. Aluminium, 1985, 61(5): 346–349.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LAI Yan-qing, LIU Ye-xiang. Research review of carbon anode consumption in aluminum electrolysis [J]. Light Metals, 2002, 286(8): 3–8. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. LAI Yan-qing, LI Jie, LIU Ye-xiang, et al. The effect of aluminum-contained additives on the reactivity of pitch binder in CO2 [C]// Anjier J L. Light Metals 2001. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2001: 669–676.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turner N R. Relative contributions from the binder and the aggregate to oxidation impurity levels in a model anode binder matrix [C]// Anjier J L. Light Metals 2001. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2001: 701–709.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Franca G, Mesquita C, Edwards L, et al. Anode quality improvements at the valesul smelter [C]// Crepeau P N. Light Metals 2003. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 2003: 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer W K, Mannweiler U, de Vries A J. Outlook of the anode requirement for the world aluminum industry in 2015 [C]// Tabereaux A T. Light Metals 2004. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS, 200: 579–584.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Feng-qin  (刘凤琴).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Fq., Liu, Yx., Mannweiler, U. et al. Effect of coke properties and its blending recipe on performances of carbon anode for aluminium electrolysis. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 13, 647–652 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-006-0009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-006-0009-5

Key words

CLC number

Navigation