Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Abating transport GHG emissions by hydrogen fuel cell vehicles: Chances for the developing world

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fuel cell vehicles, as the most promising clean vehicle technology for the future, represent the major chances for the developing world to avoid high-carbon lock-in in the transportation sector. In this paper, by taking China as an example, the unique advantages for China to deploy fuel cell vehicles are reviewed. Subsequently, this paper analyzes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 19 fuel cell vehicle utilization pathways by using the life cycle assessment approach. The results show that with the current grid mix in China, hydrogen from water electrolysis has the highest GHG emissions, at 3.10 kgCO2/km, while by-product hydrogen from the chlor-alkali industry has the lowest level, at 0.08 kgCO2/km. Regarding hydrogen storage and transportation, a combination of gas-hydrogen road transportation and single compression in the refueling station has the lowest GHG emissions. Regarding vehicle operation, GHG emissions from indirect methanol fuel cell are proved to be lower than those from direct hydrogen fuel cells. It is recommended that although fuel cell vehicles are promising for the developing world in reducing GHG emissions, the vehicle technology and hydrogen production issues should be well addressed to ensure the life-cycle low-carbon performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardman S, Chandan A, Shiu E, Steinberger-Wilckens R. Consumer attitudes to fuel cell vehicles post trial in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(15): 6171–6179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campanari S, Manzolini G, Garcia de la Iglesia F. Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 186(2): 464–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schafer A, Heywood J B, Weiss M A. Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: a 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment. Energy, 2006, 31(12): 2064–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekdunge P, Raberg M. The fuel cell vehicle analysis of energy use, emissions and cost. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1998, 23(5): 381–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang M. Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 112(1): 307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paster M D, Ahluwalia R K, Berry G, et al. Hydrogen storage technology options for fuel cell vehicles: well-to-wheel costs, energy efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 2011, 36(22): 14534–14551

    Google Scholar 

  7. Felgenhauer M F, Pellow M A, Benson S M, Hamacher T. Economic and environmental prospects of battery and fuel cell vehicles for the energy transition in German communities. Energy Procedia, 2016, 99: 380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Felgenhauer M F, Pellow M A, Benson S M, Hamacher T. Evaluating co-benefits of battery and fuel cell vehicles in a community in California. Energy, 2016, 114: 360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Offer G J, Howey D, Contestabile M, Clague R, Brandon N P. Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner U, Eckl R, Tzscheutschler P. Energetic life cycle assessment of fuel cell powertrain systems and alternative fuels in Germany. Energy, 2006, 31(14): 3062–3075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmadi P, Kjeang E. Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell passenger vehicles in different Canadian provinces. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40 (38): 12905–12917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winter U, Weidner H. Hydrogen for the mobility of the future results of GM/Opel’s well-to-wheel studies in North America and Europe. Fuel Cells, 2003, 3(3): 76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Han W, Zhang G, Xiao J, Bénard P, Chahine R. Demonstrations and marketing strategies of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(25): 13859–13872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Yu J, Ren J, Ma L, Zhang W, Liang H. How can fuel cell vehicles bring a bright future for this dragon? Answer by multicriteria decision making analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(39): 17183–17192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu X, Xu B, Dong J, Liu X. Near-term analysis of a roll-out strategy to introduce fuel cell vehicles and hydrogen stations in Shenzhen China. Applied Energy, 2017, 196: 229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang D, Zamel N, Jiao K, Zhou Y, Yu S, Du Q, Yin Y. Life cycle analysis of internal combustion engine, electric and fuel cell vehicles for China. Energy, 2013, 59: 402–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SAE-China.Technology Roadmap for Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicles. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016 (in Chinese)

  18. Yi B. Large scale demonstration and hydrogen source of fuel cell vehicle. In: 2nd Fuel Cell Vehicle Congress, Rugao, China, 2017 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ou X, Yan X, Zhang X. Using coal for transportation in China: life cycle GHG of coal-based fuel and electric vehicle, and policy implications. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(5): 878–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen Y. Life cycle ecological benefit evaluation of automobile parts. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Changsha: Hunan University, 2014 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y. Research on evaluating the several methods of hydrogen production technology by life cycle assessment. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2010 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pan H, Wang Q. Economic and technical comparison of three typical coal gasification technologies for hydrogen preparation. Shanxi Science and Technology, 2016, 31(3): 42–47 (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu G. Cost analysis of hydrogen production by NG reformation. Engineering Technology, 2016, 11: 00287–00289 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. GB 21257–2014. The Norm of Energy Consumption Per Unit Product of Caustic Soda. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2014 (in Chinese)

  25. Sun Y. Assessment and countermeasure study of coal-based methanol cleaner production based on life cycle assessment (LCA): a case study of a classical coal-based methanol process. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2013 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tang L, Qiu L, Yao L, et al. Review on research and developments of hydrogen liquefaction systems. Journal of Refrigeration, 2011, 32 (6): 1–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen C. Development of 300 m3 liquid hydrogen storage tank for transportation in vehicle. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. GB 24163–2009. Periodic Inspection and Evaluation of Steel Cylinder for the Storage of Compressed Natural Gas for Stations. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2009 (in Chinese)

  29. Liu J, Bai G, Ji M. Method for advancement evaluation of natural gas liquefaction process. Chemical Engineering (Albany, N.Y.), 2016, 44(11): 69–73 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kong W, Li Q, Wang X. Analysis on energy saving and emission reduction of electric vehicles based upon life-cycle energy efficiency. Electric Power, 2012, 45(9): 64–67 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2016 China Energy Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2016 (in Chinese)

  32. Ou X, Zhang X, Chang S. Alternative fuel buses currently in use in China: life-cycle fossil energy use, GHG emissions and policy recommendations. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dong J, Liu X, Xu X, Zhang S. Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen pathways from fossil sources in China. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40(15): 2105–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71403142, 71774100, and 71690241) and Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS20160140).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy; China Automotive Energy Research Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Han Hao

  2. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Zhexuan Mu, Zongwei Liu & Fuquan Zhao

Authors
  1. Han Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhexuan Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zongwei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fuquan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuquan Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, H., Mu, Z., Liu, Z. et al. Abating transport GHG emissions by hydrogen fuel cell vehicles: Chances for the developing world. Front. Energy 12, 466–480 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0561-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0561-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation