Skip to main content
Log in

Early Post-operative Complications: Incidence, Management, and Impact on Length of Hospital Stay. A Retrospective Comparison Between Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are the most common obesity surgeries. Their early complications may prolong hospital stay (HS).

Methods

Data for patients who underwent LRYGB and LSG in our clinic from 2009 through August 2012 were collected. Early post-operative complications prolonging HS (>5 days) were retrospectively analyzed, highlighting their relative incidence, management, and impact on length of HS.

Results

Sixty-six patients (4.9 %) after 1,345 LRYGB operations vs. 49 patients (7.14 %) after 686 LSG operations developed early complications. This difference is statistically significant (p = 0.039). Male gender percentage was significantly higher in complicated LSG group vs. complicated LRYGB group [23 patients (46.9 %) vs. 16 patients (24.2 %)] (p = 0.042). Mean BMI was significantly higher in the complicated LSG group (54.2 ± 8.3) vs. complicated LRYGB group (46.8 ± 5.7; p = 0.004). Median length of HS was not longer after complicated LSG compared with complicated LRYGB (11 vs. 10 days; p = 0.287). Leakage and bleeding were the most common complications after either procedure. Leakage rate was not higher after LSG (12 patients, 1.7 %) compared with LRYGB (22 patients, 1.6 %; p = 0.304). Bleeding rate was significantly higher after LSG (19 patients, 2.7 %) than after LRYGB (10 patients, 0.7 %; p = 0.004). Prolonged elevation of inflammatory markers was the most common presentation for complications after LSG (18 patients, 36.7 %) and LRYGB (31 patients, 46.9 %).

Conclusions

LSG was associated with more early complications. This may be attributed to higher BMI and predominance of males in LSG group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbatini F, Rizzello M, Casella G, et al. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding on type 2 diabetes. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1005–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122:248–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchwald H, Oien D. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagner M, Deitel M, Kalberer T, et al. The Second International Consensus Summit for Sleeve Gastrectomy, March 19–21, 2009. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:476–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Santry H, Gillen D, Lauderdale D. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1909–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffith P, Birch D, Sharma A, et al. Managing complications associated with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Can J Surg. 2012;55:329–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:956–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Runkel N, Colombo-Benkmann M, Hüttl T, et al. Evidence-based German guidelines for surgery for obesity. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stroh C, Luderer D, Weiner R, et al. Actual situation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in obesity surgery: data of quality assurance in bariatric surgery in Germany. Thrombosis. 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/209052.

  11. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (2009) www.asmbs.org/Newsite07/media/ASMBS_Metabolic_Bariatric_Surgery_Overview_FINAL_09.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2011

  12. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagner M, Boza C. Laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity. Exp Rev Med Devices. 2006;3:105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lancaster R, Hutter M. Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multicenter, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dallal R, Datta T, Braitman L. Medicare and Medicaid status predicts prolonged length of stay after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:592–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarty T, Arnold D, Lamont J, et al. Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2005;242:494–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benotti P, Wood G, Winegar D, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 2013. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828a0ee4.

  19. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;142:621–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morais A, Faintuch J, Leal A, et al. Inflammation and biochemical features of bariatric candidates: does gender matter? Obes Surg. 2011;21:71–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroh C, Köckerling F, Weiner R, et al. Are there gender-specific aspects of sleeve gastrectomy—data analysis from the quality assurance study of surgical treatment of obesity in Germany. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Inabnet W, Belle S, Bessler M, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after non-LapBand primary and revisional surgical procedures from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. LABS Consortium Writing Group. Perioperative safety in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:445–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Skroubis G, Karamanakos S, Sakellaropoulos G, et al. Comparison of early and late complications after various bariatric procedures: incidence and treatment during 15 years at a single institution. World J Surg. 2011;35:93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez A, DeMaria E, Tichansky D, et al. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marshall J, Srivastava A, Gupta SK, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass leak complications. Arch Surg. 2003;138:520–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellorin O, Abdemur A, Sucandy I, et al. Understanding the significance, reasons and patterns of abnormal vital signs after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21:707–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fullum T, Aluka K, Turner P. Decreasing anastomotic and staple line leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1403–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Madan A, Martinez J, Menzo E, et al. Omental reinforcement for intraoperative leak repairs during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2009;75:839–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ballesta C, Berindoague R, Cabrera M, et al. Management of anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:623–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Attila Csendes A, Burgos A, Braghetto I. Classification and management of leaks after gastric bypass for patients with morbid obesity: a prospective study of 60 patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22:855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson A, et al. Third international summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:749–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Herron D, Roohipour R. Complications of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:712–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Folie P. C-Reactive protein 2 days after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery reliably indicates leaks and moderately predicts morbidity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1128–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kolakowski S, Kirkland M, Schuricht A. Routine postoperative upper gastrointestinal series after Roux-en-Y gastric by pass: determination of whether it is necessary. Arch Surg. 2007;142:930–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu J, Turner M, Cho S, et al. Normal anatomy and complications after gastric bypass surgery: helical CT findings. Radiology. 2004;231:753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Blackmon S, Santora R, Schwarz P, et al. Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:931–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tan J, Kariyawasam S, Wijeratne T, et al. Diagnosis and management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;20:403–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A, et al. Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bakhos C, Alkhoury F, Kyriakides T, et al. Early post-operative hemorrhage after open and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;2:153–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232:515–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Triantafyllidis G, Lazoura O, Sioka E, et al. Anatomy and complications following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: radiological evaluation and imaging pitfalls. Obes Surg. 2011;21:473–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kothari S. Bariatric surgery and postoperative imaging. Surg Clin N Am. 2011;91:155–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sajid M, Khatri K, Singh K, et al. Use of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2884–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Consten E, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1360–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Giannopoulos G, Tzanakis N, Rallis G, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2782–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Daskalakis M, Berdan Y, Theodoridou S, et al. Impact of surgeon experience and buttress material on postoperative complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:88–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chiu C, Lee W, Wang W, et al. Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:913–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brethauer S, Schauer P. Risk–benefit analysis of laparoscopic bariatric procedures. In: Schauer P, Schirmer B, Brethauer S, editors. Minimally invasive bariatric surgery. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hutter M, Schirmer B, Jones D, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254:410–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Birkmeyer N, Dimick J, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304:435–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. DeMaria E, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Islam A. El-Sayes.

Additional information

The results of this study have been submitted for IFSO 2013 Congress in Turkey as an oral presentation. However, the result of this submission (acceptance for presentation or rejection) is not yet announced.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, R.A., El-Sayes, I.A., Theodoridou, S. et al. Early Post-operative Complications: Incidence, Management, and Impact on Length of Hospital Stay. A Retrospective Comparison Between Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 23, 2004–2012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1022-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1022-z

Keywords

Navigation