Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Midterm Results of Primary vs. Secondary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) as an Isolated Operation

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We investigated early and midterm results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an isolated primary and secondary operation after failed gastric banding.

Methods

Between May 2004 and October 2007, a total of 70 patients (female 77%, mean age 43 (21–65) years, mean initial body mass index (BMI) 46 (35–61) kg/m2) were prospectively evaluated and operated by LSG. In 41 patients, LSG was performed as a primary operation (group 1) and in 29 patients as a secondary procedure after failed gastric banding (group 2). The overall average follow-up time after LSG was 24 (12–53) months; follow-up rate 1 year after operation was 100%, after 2 years 98%, and after 3 years 95%.

Results

There were no intraoperative complications, no conversion with shorter operation time in group 1 (91 vs. 132 min, p = 0.001). Early morbidity of LSG was 5% (major) and 7% (minor); mortality was zero. Average excessive BMI loss after 1 year was 65% (9–127%), after 2 years 63% (13–123%), and after 3 years 60% (9–111%). Midterm morbidity was 13%. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding early and midterm morbidity, reoperation rate for complications (11.4%), or insufficient weight loss (7%).

Conclusions

LSG is a safe bariatric procedure with good weight loss in the first 3 years postop. It can be used as an isolated initial treatment and as a secondary treatment after failed gastric banding. However, in the absence of long-term results, we suggest LSG to be performed only in controlled trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Sjöström L, Lindroos A, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2683–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström D, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007;357:741–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Kern B, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008;4:500–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen B, Peters T, et al. Prospective study of a two-stage operative concept in the treatment of morbid obesity: primary lap-band followed if necessary by sleeve gastrectomy with duodenal switch. Obes Surg 2007;17:334–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg 1998;8:487–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg 2003;13:861–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2006;20:859–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Gelfand DV. Staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a novel two-stage bariatric operation as an alternative in the super-obese with massively enlarged liver. Obes Surg 2005;15:1077–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Melissas J, Daskalakis M, Koukouraki S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy—a “food limiting” operation. Obes Surg 2008;18:1251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roa PE, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. Obes Surg 2006;16:1323–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon Han S, Kim WW, Oh JH. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at 1 year in morbidly obese Korean patients. Obes Surg 2005;15:1469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin M, Yehoshua RT, Stein M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with minimal morbidity early results in 120 morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2008;18:1567–70. Aug 15. [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karamanakos SN, Vagenas K, Kalfarentzos F, et al. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg 2008;247:401–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Santoro S, Milleo FQ, Malzoni CE, et al. Enterohormonal changes after digestive adaptation: five-year results of a surgical proposal to treat obesity and associated diseases. Obes Surg 2008;18:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg 2005;15:1024–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ariyasu H, Takaya K, Tagami T, et al. Stomach is a major source of circulating ghrelin, and feeding state determines plasma ghrelin-like immunoreactivity levels in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:4753–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Christou N, Sampalis J, Liberman M, Look D, Anger S, McLean A, McLean L. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2004;240:416–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Felberbauer FX, Langer F, Shakeri-Manesch S, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an isolated bariatric procedure: intermediate-term results from a large series in three Austrian centers. Obes Surg 2008;18:814–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Balthasar A, Serra C, Perez N, et al. Re-sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2006;16:1535–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg 2005;15(7):1030–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frezza E, Reddy S, Gee LG, et al. Complications after sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2008. doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9677-6[Epub ahead of print].

  22. Lee C, Cirangle P, Jossart G. Vertical gastrectomy for morbid obesity in 216 patients: report of two-years results. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadiere GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg 2006;16:1450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial support

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Peterli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uglioni, B., Wölnerhanssen, B., Peters, T. et al. Midterm Results of Primary vs. Secondary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) as an Isolated Operation. OBES SURG 19, 401–406 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9804-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9804-z

Keywords

Navigation