Abstract
This study was conducted to characterize the physicochemical properties of duck feet gelatin extracted by using different acid solutions which is hydrochloric acid (DFCl), acetic acid (DFAa), lactic acid (DFLa), and citric acid (DFCa). Proximate analysis, bloom strength, amino acid composition and sensory profiles were evaluated. Duck feet gelatin had higher bloom strength with 225.53, 334.17, 322.17 and 322.63 g for DFCl, DFAa, DFLa and DFCa, respectively, compared to commercial bovine gelatin with 216.63 g. DFCa had the highest imino acid with value of 23.01% compared to other gelatin sample. Sensory profiles in powder and gels form of gelatin were evaluated by 12 trained panellists using quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA). Overall, gelatin powder of DFCl had the highest degree of acceptability with average score of 11.15, but there’s no significant different between DFCa. While for gelatin gel, DFCa had the highest intensity of fracturability, firmness and the overall degree of acceptability score is 10.48, but there is no significant difference among other acid treatments. It was found that all extracted duck feet gelatin has high potential for application as an alternative to commercial gelatin that already available in market.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
25 October 2017
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The first author name was incorrectly submitted and published as Nik Aisyah, N.M. instead of Nik Muhammad, N. The original article has been corrected.
References
F. Badii, N.K. Howell, Fish gelatin: structure, gelling properties and interaction with egg albumen proteins. Food Hydrocoll. 20, 630–640 (2006)
A.A. Karim, R. Bhat, Fish gelatin: properties, challenges, and prospects as an alternative to mammalian gelatins. Food Hydrocoll. 23, 563–576 (2009)
Y.-H. Kuan, A.M. Nafchi, N. Huda, F. Ariffin, A.A. Karim, Effects of sugars on the gelation kinetics and texture of duck feet gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 58, 267–275 (2016)
M. Araghi, Z. Moslehi, A. Mohammadi Nafchi, A. Mostahsan, N. Salamat, A. Daraei Garmakhany, Cold water fish gelatin modification by a natural phenolic cross-linker (ferulic acid and caffeic acid). Food Sci. Nutr. 3, 370–375 (2015)
N. Nieuwenhuizen, A.L. Lopata, M.F. Jeebhay, D.B.R. Herbert, T.G. Robins, F. Brombacher, Exposure to the fish parasite Anisakis causes allergic airway hyperreactivity and dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117, 1098–1105 (2006)
P. Hazaveh, A. Mohammadi Nafchi, H. Abbaspour, The effects of sugars on moisture sorption isotherm and functional properties of cold water fish gelatin films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 79, 370–376 (2015)
S. Cliche, J. Amiot, C. Avezard, C. Gariepy, Extraction and characterization of collagen with or without telopeptides from chicken skin. Poult. Sci. 82, 503–509 (2003)
H.-Y. Kim, K.-J. Kim, J.-W. Lee, G.-W. Kim, C.-J. Kim, Effects of chicken feet gelatin and wheat fiber levels on quality properties of semi-dried chicken jerky. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 32, 732–739 (2012)
N. Mhd Sarbon, F. Badii, N.K. Howell, Preparation and characterisation of chicken skin gelatin as an alternative to mammalian gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 30, 143–151 (2013)
Q.-R. Zeng, M. Zhang, B.P. Adhikari, A.S. Mujumdar, Effect of drying processes on the functional properties of collagen peptides produced from chicken skin. Dry. Technol. 31, 1653–1660 (2013)
P. Hashim, M.M. Ridzwan, J. Bakar, Isolation and characterization of collagen from chicken feet. Int. J. Biol. Vet. Agric. Food Eng. 8, 242–246 (2014)
R. Widyasari, S. Rawdkuen, Extraction and characterization of gelatin from chicken feet by acid and ultrasound assisted extraction. Food Appl. Biosci. J. 2, 83–95 (2014)
Y.K. Lin, D.C. Liu, Effects of pepsin digestion at different temperatures and times on properties of telopeptide-poor collagen from bird feet. Food Chem. 94, 621–625 (2006)
F.-Y. Cheng, F.-W. Hsu, H.-S. Chang, L.-C. Lin, R. Sakata, Effect of different acids on the extraction of pepsin-solubilised collagen containing melanin from silky fowl feet. Food Chem. 113, 563–567 (2009)
N. Huda, E. Seow, M. Normawati, N.N. Aisyah, Preliminary study on physicochemical properties of duck feet collagen. Int. J. Poult. Sci 12, 615 (2013)
H.-W. Kim, J.-H. Park, E.-J. Yeo, K.-E. Hwang, D.-H. Song, Y.-J. Kim, Y.-K. Ham, T.-J. Jeong, Y.-S. Choi, C.-J. Kim, Effect of duck feet gelatin concentration on physicochemical, textural, and sensory properties of duck meat jellies. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 34, 387–394 (2014)
N. Huda, E. Seow, M. Normawati, N. Nik Aisyah, A. Fazilah, A. Easa, Effect of duck feet collagen addition on physicochemical properties of surimi. Int. Food Res. J. 20, 537–544 (2013)
N. Rahman, S. Jamalulail, Extraction, physicochemical characterizations and sensory quality of chicken feet gelatin. Borneo Sci. 30, 1–13 (2012)
A. Abedinia, F. Ariffin, N. Huda, A.M. Nafchi, Extraction and characterization of gelatin from the feet of Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos domestica) as affected by acid, alkaline, and enzyme pretreatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 98, 586–594 (2017)
Y.-H. Kuan, A.M. Nafchi, N. Huda, F. Ariffin, A.A. Karim, Comparison of physicochemical and functional properties of duck feet and bovine gelatins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 97, 1663–1671 (2017)
A. Aronal, N. Huda, R. Ahmad, Amino acid and fatty acid profiles of Peking and Muscovy duck meat. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 11(3), 229–236 (2012)
G. Boran, H.T. Lawless, J.M. Regenstein, Effects of extraction conditions on the sensory and instrumental characteristics of fish gelatin gels. J. Food Sci. 75, S469–S476 (2010)
J.K. Jakhar, A.D. Reddy, S. Maharia, H.M. Devi, G.V.S. Reddy, G. Venkateshwarlu, Characterization of fish gelatin from blackspotted croaker (Protonibea diacanthus). Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 4, 1353–1358 (2012)
P.F. de Almeida, J.R. da Silva, S.C. da Silva Lannes, T.M. de Brito Farias, J.C.C. Santana, Quality assurance and economical feasibility of an innovative product obtained from a byproduct of the meat industry in Brazil. Afr. J. Bus. Manag 7, 2745–2756 (2013)
J. Lim, S. Oh, K.-O. Kim, The effects of processing conditions on the properties of chicken feet gelatin. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 10, 638–645 (2001)
P.F. Almeida, S.C. Lannes, Extraction and physicochemical characterization of gelatin from chicken by-product. J. Food Process. Eng. 36, 824–833 (2013)
R. Schrieber, H. Gareis, Gelatine handbook: theory and industrial practice. (Wiley, Weinheim, 2007)
D. Ledward, G. Phillips, P. Williams, Gelatin. Handbook of hydrocolloids. (Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, 2000), pp. 67–86
C.S. Cheow, M.S. Norizah, Z.Y. Kyaw, N.K. Howell, Preparation and characterisation of gelatins from the skins of sin croaker (Johnius dussumieri) and shortfin scad (Decapterus macrosoma). Food Chem. 101, 386–391 (2007)
Z. Khiari, D. Rico, A.B. Martin-Diana, C. Barry-Ryan, The extraction of gelatine from mackerel (Scomber scombrus) heads with the use of different organic acids. J. FisheriesSciences.com 5, 52–63 (2011)
S. Sukkwai, K. Kijroongrojana, S. Benjakul, Extraction of gelatin from bigeye snapper (Priacanthus tayenus) skin for gelatin hydrolysate production. Int. Food Res. J. 18, 1129–1134 (2011)
K. Ramadhan, N. Huda, R. Ahmad, Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of burger made from duck surimi-like material. Poult. Sci. 91, 2316–2323 (2012)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia by giving the financial support to carry out this project thru Research University (RU) Grant 1001/PTEKIND/815081.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: The error in author name has been corrected.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9671-6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nik Muhammad, N., Huda, N., Karim, A.A. et al. Effects of acid type extraction on characterization and sensory profile of duck feet gelatin: towards finding bovine gelatin alternative. Food Measure 12, 480–486 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9661-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9661-8