Abstract
The dependency of the society on the hydrocarbon as an energy source has increased tremendously, leading to the rapid development of this process industry. A fire accident that occurred on the 6th of July 2016 at a petrochemical complex plant in the southern part of Iran, Mahshahr petrochemical zone, has called for a more robust and all-inclusive efforts toward ameliorating and forestalling future occurrence. The on-site investigations concluded that the fire was triggered by the leakages through the ruptured blind flange gasket in the pipeline. Thus, certain inquiries on the development of robust process safety technologies gave useful insight into those capable enough to identify and handle various uncertainties in the short and long time basis, to forestall catastrophic accidents. Therefore, it is worthy and pertinent to ascertain whether process safety technology is developing correspondingly at the same pace with the process industry. Are the correct things done in the right way? If yes, then why do these catastrophic accidents keep happening? If no, how can these uncertainties in the process be properly and adequately handled, contained and managed? Failure to provide adequate and incontrovertible answers to these questions toward taking uncompromising safety actions is an invitation to more accidents in the near future. In this study, explanation on how to identify and cope with various uncertainties in process safety science is provided through learning from a real case study of a fire accident that occurred in the aforementioned petrochemical plant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tasnim, Big fire at Iran petchem plant goes out after 57 hours, Tasnim News Agency (2016). https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2016/07/09/1124784/big-fire-at-iran-petchem-plant-goes-out-after-57-hours. Accessed 9 July 2016
A. Al-shanini, A. Ahmad, F. Khan, Accident modelling and analysis in process industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 32, 319–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.09.016
Bouali Sina Fire Accident Report (HSE Department, Mahshahr, 2016). (in Persian). https://up.20script.ir/file/10c4-Bouali-Sina-Fire-Accident-Report-HSE-Department-Mahshahr-2016-in-Persian-.pdf
S.J. Hashemi, F. Khan, S. Ahmed, Multivariate probabilistic safety analysis of process facilities using the Copula Bayesian Network model. Comput. Chem. Eng. 93, 128–142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.06.011
A.S. Markowski, M. Sam Mannan, ExSys-LOPA for the chemical process industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23, 688–696 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.05.011
M. Yazdi, The application of bow-tie method in hydrogen sulfide risk management using layer of protection analysis (LOPA). J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 17, 291–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0247-x
H. Zerrouki, H. Smadi, Bayesian belief network used in the chemical and process industry: a review and application. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 17, 159–165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0231-x
M. Giardina, M. Morale, Safety study of an LNG regasification plant using an FMECA and HAZOP integrated methodology. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 35, 35–45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JLP.2015.03.013
A.S. Markowski, D. Siuta, Fuzzy logic approach to calculation of thermal hazard distances in process industries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 92, 338–345 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.02.005
A.S. Markowski, M.S. Mannan, A. Kotynia, D. Siuta, Uncertainty aspects in process safety analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23, 446–454 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.005
M. Yazdi, An extension of fuzzy improved risk graph and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for determination of chemical complex safety integrity levels. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 25, 551–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1419654
M. Yazdi, F. Nikfar, M. Nasrabadi, Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 8, 1177–1193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0583-y
T. Kletz, The history of process safety. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25, 763–765 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.03.011
H. Zerrouki, A. Tamrabet, Safety and risk analysis of an operational heater using bayesian network. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 15, 657–661 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-015-9986-8
E. Mkpat, G. Reniers, V. Cozzani, Process safety education: a literature review. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 54, 18–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.02.003
A.S. Markowski, M.S. Mannan, A. Bigoszewska, Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22, 695–702 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.11.011
M. Yazdi, O. Korhan, S. Daneshvar, Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in process industry. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636
M. Yazdi, Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge in failure diagnosis analysis using intuitionistic and pythagorean assessments. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00599-w
M. Yazdi, S. Kabir, A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 111, 507–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.015
P.R. Amyotte, S. Berger, D.W. Edwards, J.P. Gupta, D.C. Hendershot, F.I. Khan, M.S. Mannan, R.J. Willey, Why major accidents are still occurring. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 14, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COCHE.2016.07.003
M.S. Mannan, O. Reyes-Valdes, P. Jain, N. Tamim, M. Ahammad, The evolution of process safety: current status and future direction. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 135–162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-033640
F. Khan, S. Ahmed, M. Yang, S.J. Hashemi, S. Caines, S. Rathnayaka, D. Oldford, Safety challenges in harsh environments: lessons learned. Process Saf. Prog. 34, 191–195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11704
M. Yazdi, A perceptual computing: based method to prioritize intervention actions in the probabilistic risk assessment techniques. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2566
M. Yazdi, M. Darvishmotevali, Fuzzy-Based Failure Diagnostic Analysis in a Chemical Process Industry (Springer, Cham, 2019), pp. 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04164-9_95
M. Yazdi, Introducing a heuristic approach to enhance the reliability of system safety assessment. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2545
M. Yazdi, Footprint of knowledge acquisition improvement in failure diagnosis analysis. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2408
J.T. Reason, Human Error (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)
C. Hart, Accident Precursor Analysis and Management: Reducing Technological Risk Through Diligence (National Academies Press, Washington, 2004)
M. Yazdi, Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Saf. Sci. 110, 438–448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005
M. Cheraghi, A. Eslami Baladeh, N. Khakzad, A fuzzy multi-attribute HAZOP technique (FMA-HAZOP): application to gas wellhead facilities. Saf. Sci. 114, 12–22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.024
M. Naderpour, N. Khakzad, Texas LPG fire: Domino effects triggered by natural hazards. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 116, 354–364 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2018.03.008
N. Khakzad, Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138, 263–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.007
A. Misuri, N. Khakzad, G. Reniers, V. Cozzani, Tackling uncertainty in security assessment of critical infrastructures: Dempster-Shafer theory vs. credal sets theory. Saf. Sci. 107, 62–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.007
N. Khakzad, G. Reniers, Using graph theory to analyze the vulnerability of process plants in the context of cascading effects. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 143, 63–73 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.015
M. Yazdi, A review paper to examine the validity of Bayesian network to build rational consensus in subjective probabilistic failure analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-00757-7
N. Khakzad, Protecting chemical plants against terrorist attacks: a review. J. Soc. 05, 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0358.1000142
S. Mannan, F.P. Lees, Lees’ Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment, and Control (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2005)
P.G. Kovatsis, J.E. Fiadjoe, Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. Pediatr. Anesth. 26, 333–334 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12861
D.A. Crowl, J.F. Louvar, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2011)
T.A. Kletz, Still Going Wrong! Case Histories of Process Plant Disasters and How They Could have been Avoided (Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, 2003)
M. Yazdi, E. Zarei, Uncertainty handling in the safety risk analysis: an integrated approach based on fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0421-9
H. Pasman, W. Rogers, How can we use the information provided by process safety performance indicators? Possibilities and limitations. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 30, 197–206 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.06.001
A. Targoutzidis, Incorporating human factors into a simplified “bow-tie” approach for workplace risk assessment. Saf. Sci. 48, 145–156 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.07.005
M. Yazdi, S. Kabir, M. Walker, Uncertainty handling in fault tree based risk assessment: state of the art and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 131, 89–104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.09.003
I.L. Johansen, M. Rausand, Ambiguity in risk assessment. Saf. Sci. 80, 243–251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.028
C. Zhang, Y. Wei, Z. Li, Y. Zhao, Hazard-based design of the bow-tie method to prevent and mitigate mine accidents. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0367-3
F. Aqlan, E. Mustafa Ali, Integrating lean principles and fuzzy bow-tie analysis for risk assessment in chemical industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 29, 39–48 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.01.006
A.S. Markowski, A. Kotynia, “Bow-tie” model in layer of protection analysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 89, 205–213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005
F. Yan, K. Xu, X. Yao, Y. Li, Fuzzy Bayesian network-bow-tie analysis of gas leakage during biomass gasification. PLoS ONE 11, e0160045 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160045
A. Shahriar, R. Sadiq, S. Tesfamariam, Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: a sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25, 505–523 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007
S. Cai, J. Hu, L. Zhang, Risk analysis of refining equipment based on fuzzy theory and bow-tie model, in Chinese Control Conference CCC, 2016-Aug (2016), pp. 9704–9711. https://doi.org/10.1109/chicc.2016.7554896
M. Yazdi, A. Nedjati, R. Abbassi, Fuzzy dynamic risk-based maintenance investment optimization for offshore process facilities. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 57, 194–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.014
J. Henderson, D. Embrey, R. Associates, Quantifying human reliability in risk assessments. Pet. Rev. 66, 30–32 (2012)
C.B. Holroyd, M.G.H. Coles, The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 109, 679–709 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.679
J. Reason, Human error: models and management. BMJ 320, 768–770 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
S. Kaplan, The words of risk analysis. Risk Anal. 17, 407–417 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00881.x
OSHA, Process Safety Management (OSHA 3132) (OSHA, Washington, 2000)
P. Amyotte, An Introduction to Dust Explosions: Understanding the Myths and Realities of Dust Explosions for a Safer Workplace (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013)
Canadian Society of Chemical Engineering, Process Safety Management (2012). https://doi.org/10.1201/b11069-30
B.D. Kelly, Why process safety programs sometimes fail. Process Saf. Prog. 30, 307–309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10494
J. Tharaldsen, K. Haukelid, Culture and behavioural perspectives on safety: towards a balanced approach. J. Risk Res. 12, 375–388 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870902757252
M.S. Mannan, R.A. Mentzer, J. Zhang, Framework for creating a best-in-class safety culture. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26, 1423–1432 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.09.007
W.H. Glick, Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 10, 601 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/258140
A.P. Jones, L.R. James, Psychological climate: dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 23, 201–250 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90056-4
D.C. Hendershot, Guest perspective on Bhopal: why can’t we do better? Thoughts on the 30th anniversary of the Bhopal tragedy. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 36, 183–184 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JLP.2015.06.011
National Petochemical Compnay, Petochemcial accident report (Annually), Tehran (2017)
M. Yazdi, Improving failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) with consideration of uncertainty handling as an interactive approach. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0496-2
T.L. Mathis, S.M. Galloway, Steps to Safety Culture Excellence (Wiley, 2013). https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Steps+to+Safety+Culture+Excellence-p-9781118098486. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
M.N. Vinodkumar, M. Bhasi, Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42, 2082–2093 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
E. De Rademaeker, G. Suter, H.J. Pasman, B. Fabiano, A review of the past, present and future of the European loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 92, 280–291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.03.007
F. Khan, S.J. Hashemi, N. Paltrinieri, P. Amyotte, V. Cozzani, G. Reniers, Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 14, 9–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COCHE.2016.07.006
HSE, Reducing error and influencing behaviour, HSE Books (1999). http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg48.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2018
F. Khan, Methods in Chemical Process Safety, vol. 1, 1st edn. (2017)
Acknowledgment
First author would like to express his gratitude to the BSPP for supporting this study by releasing all the vital information related to the accident and for allowing us to use the Figures for publication. Our profound appreciation also goes to the experts that participated by sparing their valuable time, experience, and for the insightful comments rendered.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yazdi, M., Adesina, K.A., Korhan, O. et al. Learning from Fire Accident at Bouali Sina Petrochemical Complex Plant. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 19, 1517–1536 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00769-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00769-w