Abstract
Nowadays knowledge management has received a considerable attention from both academics and industrial sectors, and expert knowledge is recognized as the most important resource of enterprises, particularly in the knowledge-intensive organizations. Dealing with knowledge creation, transfer, and utilization is increasingly critical for the long-term sustainable competitive advantage and success of any organization. Thus, a lot of efforts have been required from companies and researchers in developing and supporting knowledge management in different organizations. In industrial sectors as the highly competitive environment, capturing and disseminating of tacit knowledge are significant to an organization’s success with the development of knowledge-based systems. Safety and reliability analysis is an important issue to prevent an event which may be the occurrence of catastrophic accident in process industries. In this context, conventional safety and reliability assessment techniques like fault tree analysis have been widely used in this regard; however, in practical knowledge acquisition process, domain experts tend to express their judgments using multi-granularity linguistic term sets, and there usually exists uncertain and incomplete information since expert knowledge is experience-based and tacit. In addition, although the technical capabilities of expert systems based on fuzzy set theory are expanding, they still fall short of meeting the increasingly complex knowledge demands and still suffer in subjective uncertainty processing and dynamic structure representation which are important in risk assessment procedure. In this paper, a new framework based on 2-tuple intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Pythagorean fuzzy sets, and Bayesian network mechanism is proposed to evaluate system reliability, to deal with mentioned drawbacks, and to recognize the most critical system components which affect the system reliability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H.-C. Liu, L. Liu, Q.-L. Lin, N. Liu, Knowledge acquisition and representation using fuzzy evidential reasoning and dynamic adaptive fuzzy Petri nets. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 43, 1059–1072 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2223671
D.S. Yeung, E.C.C. Tsang, Fuzzy knowledge representation and reasoning using Petri nets. Expert Syst. Appl. 7, 281–289 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-4174(94)90044-2
M. Yazdi, The application of Bow–Tie method in hydrogen sulfide risk management using layer of protection analysis (LOPA). J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 17, 291–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0247-x
S. Kabir, An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 77, 114–135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.058
J.L. Feinstein, Introduction to expert systems. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 8, 182–187 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/3323375
D.S. Yeung, E.C.C. Tsang, Weighted fuzzy production rules. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 88, 299–313 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00052-8
C.G. Looney, Fuzzy Petri nets for rule-based decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 18, 178–183 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87067
M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension (1966). https://philpapers.org/rec/POLTTD-2. (Accessed March 8, 2018)
H. Li, J.-X. You, H.-C. Liu, G. Tian, Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge based on interval 2-Tuple linguistic assessments and extended fuzzy Petri nets. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 26, 43–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218488518500034
H.-C. Liu, Q.-L. Lin, L.-X. Mao, Z.-Y. Zhang, Dynamic adaptive fuzzy Petri nets for knowledge representation and reasoning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst. 43, 1399–1410 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2013.2256125
M. Yazdi, An extension of Fuzzy Improved Risk Graph and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for determination of chemical complex safety integrity levels. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1419654
K.-Q. Zhou, A.M. Zain, Fuzzy Petri nets and industrial applications: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 45, 405–446 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-015-9451-9
X. Deng, D. Han, J. Dezert, Y. Deng, Y. Shyr, Evidence combination from an evolutionary game theory perspective. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46, 2070–2082 (2016)
H.S. Yan, A new complicated-knowledge representation approach based on knowledge meshes. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18, 47–62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2006.2
L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
M. Yazdi, M. Darvishmotevali, Fuzzy-Based Failure Diagnostic Analysis in a Chemical Process Industry (Springer, Cham, 2019), pp. 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04164-9_95
C.S. Liaw, Y.C. Chang, K.H. Chang, T.Y. Chang, ME-OWA based DEMATEL reliability apportionment method. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 9713–9723 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.029
H.C. Liu, J.X. You, X.Y. You, Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure. Comput. Ind. Eng. 78, 249–258 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.018
S. Wan, G. Xu, J. Dong, Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment. Inf. Sci. (Ny). 385–386, 19–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.032
A. Singh, A. Gupta, A. Mehra, Energy planning problems with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Oper. Res. 17, 821–848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0245-x
H.C. Liu, M.L. Ren, J. Wu, Q.L. Lin, An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52, 2867–2880 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.854939
M.M. Shan, J.X. You, H.C. Liu, Some interval 2-tuple linguistic harmonic mean operators and their application in material selection. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7034938
J. Lin, Q. Zhang, F. Meng, An approach for facility location selection based on optimal aggregation operator. Knowl. Based Syst. 85, 143–158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.001
E. Bozdag, U. Asan, A. Soyer, S. Serdarasan, Risk prioritization in Failure mode and effects analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 4000–4015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.015
H. Liu, L. Liu, P. Li, Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 45, 2012–2030 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2012.760669
M. Yazdi, Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Saf. Sci. 110, 438–448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005
M. Yazdi, H. Soltanali, Knowledge acquisition development in failure diagnosis analysis as an interactive approach. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. Int. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0504-6
M. Yazdi, Footprint of knowledge acquisition improvement in failure diagnosis analysis. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 35, 405–422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2408
S. Rajakarunakaran, A. Maniram Kumar, V. Arumuga Prabhu, Applications of fuzzy faulty tree analysis and expert elicitation for evaluation of risks in LPG refuelling station. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 33, 109–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.016
M. Yazdi, E. Zarei, Uncertainty handling in the safety risk analysis: an integrated approach based on fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0421-9
S. Kabir, M. Yazdi, J.I. Aizpurua, Y. Papadopoulos, Uncertainty-Aware dynamic reliability analysis framework for complex systems. IEEE Access. 6, 29499–29515 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2843166
S. Ming-Hung, C. Ching-Hsue, J.-R. Chang, Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board. Assembly 46, 2139–2148 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2006.01.007
J.R. Chang, K.H. Chang, S.H. Liao, C.H. Cheng, The reliability of general vague fault-tree analysis on weapon systems fault diagnosis. Soft. Comput. 10, 531–542 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0483-y
S.R. Cheng, B. Lin, B.M. Hsu, M.H. Shu, Fault-tree analysis for liquefied natural gas terminal emergency shutdown system. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 11918–11924 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.011
M. Kumar, S.P. Yadav, The weakest t -norm based intuitionistic fuzzy fault-tree analysis to evaluate system reliability. ISA Trans. 51, 531–538 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2012.01.004
M. Gul, Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251
E. Ilbahar, A. Karaşan, S. Cebi, C. Kahraman, A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Saf. Sci. 103, 124–136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2017.10.025
A. Karasan, E. Ilbahar, S. Cebi, C. Kahraman, A new risk assessment approach: safety and critical effect analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Saf. Sci. 108, 173–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2018.04.031
N.E. Oz, S. Mete, F. Serin, M. Gul, Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: An extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1495057
R. Abbassi, J. Bhandari, F. Khan, V. Garaniya, S. Chai, Developing a quantitative risk-based methodology for maintenance scheduling using Bayesian network. Chem. Eng. Trans. 48, 235–240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1648040
M. Abimbola, F. Khan, N. Khakzad, Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 30, 74–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.05.002
T.D. Nielsen, F.V. Jensen, Bayesian networks and decision graphs, vol. 2nd (Springer, New York, 2009)
E. Zarei, A. Azadeh, M.M. Aliabadi, I. Mohammadfam, Dynamic safety risk modeling of process systems using Bayesian network. Process Saf. Prog. 36, 399–407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11889
M. Yazdi, A review paper to examine the validity of Bayesian network to build rational consensus in subjective probabilistic failure analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-00757-7
M. Yazdi, S. Kabir, Fuzzy evidence theory and Bayesian networks for process systems risk analysis. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1493679
S. Kabir, M. Walker, Y. Papadopoulos, Dynamic system safety analysis in HiP-HOPS with Petri nets and Bayesian networks. Saf. Sci. 105, 55–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.001
M. Yazdi, F. Nikfar, M. Nasrabadi, Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 8, 1177–1193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0583-y
M. Yazdi, O. Korhan, S. Daneshvar, Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in process industry. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636
A.K. Verma, A. Srividya, D.R. Karanki, Reliability and Safety Engineering (Springer, London, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-232-2
F.V. Jensen, T.D. Nielsen, Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs (Springer, Berlin, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
D.N. Ford, J.D. Sterman, Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 14, 309–340 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4%3c309:AID-SDR154%3e3.0.CO;2-5
M. Yazdi, S. Daneshvar, H. Setareh, An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf. Sci. 98, 113–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009
S. Helvacioglu, E. Ozen, Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design. Ocean Eng. 79, 131–141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.015
T.L. Saaty, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15, 234–281 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
A.F. Guneri, M. Gul, S. Ozgurler, A fuzzy AHP methodology for selection of risk assessment methods in occupational safety. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 18, 319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2015.071222
M. Yazdi, S. Kabir, A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 111, 507–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.015
J.J. Buckley, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17, 233–247 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
D.-Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95, 649–655 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
M. Yazdi, Improving failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) with consideration of uncertainty handling as an interactive approach. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0496-2
K.T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Z. Xu, Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowledge-Based Syst. 24, 749–760 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.011
K.H. Chang, C.H. Cheng, Y.C. Chang, Reprioritization of failures in a silane supply system using an intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique. Soft. Comput. 14, 285–298 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0403-7
K.-H. Chang, C.-H. Cheng, A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 41, 1457–1471 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720903353633
E. Szmidt, Distances and similarities in intuitionistic fuzzy sets (Springer, Cham, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01640-5_1
Z. Xu, R.R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen Syst 35, 417–433 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600574353
W. Wang, X. Liu, Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 923–938 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2189405
Z. Xu, N. Zhao, Information fusion for intuitionistic fuzzy decision making: an overview. Inf. Fus. 28, 10–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.07.001
Z. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 1179–1187 (2007)
S. Zeng, The intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging-weighted average operator and its application in financial decision making. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 6, 541–547 (2012)
F.E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, D. Akay, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 11363–11368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039
M. Yazdi, A. Nedjati, R. Abbassi, Fuzzy dynamic risk-based maintenance investment optimization for offshore process facilities. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 57, 194–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.014
D. Huang, T. Chen, M.-J.J. Wang, A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118, 153–165 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00288-7
R.R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, in 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IEEE, pp. 57–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608375
R.R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22, 958–965 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
R.R. Yager, A.M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28, 436–452 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21584
T. Onisawa, An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 27, 87–103 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(88)90140-6
M. Yazdi, Hybrid probabilistic risk assessment using fuzzy FTA and fuzzy AHP in a process industry. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 17, 756–764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0305-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yazdi, M. Acquiring and Sharing Tacit Knowledge in Failure Diagnosis Analysis Using Intuitionistic and Pythagorean Assessments. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 19, 369–386 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00599-w
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00599-w