Abstract
Inorganic nitrate (NO3 −) and ammonium (NH4 +) are the two major components in nitrogen (N) nutrition of typical tissue culture growth media, and the total amounts and ratios influence both shoot induction and differentiation. This study was designed to determine the optimal N requirements and interactions of NH4 + × NO3 − to complete the optimization of a pear shoot culture medium. Pyrus communis ‘Horner 51’ and ‘OH × F 87’, P. cordata, P. pyrifolia ‘Sion Szu Mi’, and P. ussuriensis ‘Hang Pa Li’ from the pear germplasm collection of the US Department of Agriculture, National Clonal Germplasm Repository–Corvallis (NCGR) were evaluated. Response surface design was used to create and analyze treatment combinations of NH4 +, K+, and NO3 −. Cultures were evaluated for overall quality, shoot length, multiplication, leaf color and size, leaf spotting and necrosis, and callus production. Significant improvement was observed in multiplication and length for most genotypes. Reduced callus amounts were seen in two genotypes, and greener leaves were also seen in two genotypes. Each species had a distinct response, and the N form could be manipulated to produce longer shoots, more shoots, or less callus. For the best-quality shoots, both P. communis cultivars required high NO3 − and low to moderate NH4 +, P. cordata quality was best with high NO3 − and NH4 +, P. pyrifolia ‘Sion Szu Mi’ quality improved with moderate NO3 − and high NH4 +, and P. ussuriensis ‘Hang Pa Li’ required low NO3 − and high NH4 +. This study illustrates that optimizing the N components of a growth medium is very important when working with diverse plant germplasm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Qaoud H, Skirvin RM, Below FE (1991) Influence of nitrogen form and NH4-N/:NO-N ratios on adventitious shoot formation from pear (Pyrus communis) leaf explants in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 27:315–319
Cousson A, Van KTT (1993) Influence of ionic composition of the culture medium on de novo flower formation in tobacco thin cell layers. Can J Bot 71:506–511
Design-Expert (2010), Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN
Dougall DK, Weyrauch KW (1980) Abilities of organic-acids to support growth and anthocyanin accumulation by suspension-cultures of wild carrot cells using ammonium as the sole nitrogen-source. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 16:969–975
Engelsberger WR, Schulze WX (2012) Nitrate and ammonium lead to distinct global dynamic phosphorylation patterns when resupplied to nitrogen starved Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J 69:978–995
Evens TJ, Niedz RP ARS-Media: Ion Solution Calculator (2008), U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Ft. Pierce, FL 34945 USA
Forde BG, Clarkson DT, Callow JA (1999) Nitrate and ammonium nutrition of plants: physiological and molecular perspectives. In: Advances in Botanical Research. Academic Press, pp 1–90
Grimes H, Hodges T (1990) The inorganic NO3-: NH4+ ratio influences plant regeneration and auxin sensitivity in primary callus derived from immature embryos of indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol 136:362–367
Guidi L, Lorefice G, Pardossi A, Malorgio F, Tognoni F, Soldatini G (1997) Growth and photosynthesis of Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) plants as affected by nitrogen deficiency. Biol Plant 40:235–244
Ivanova M, Van Staden J (2009) Nitrogen source, concentration, and NH4 +:NO3 − ratio influence shoot regeneration and hyperhydricity in tissue cultured Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 99:167–174
Jain V, Pal M, Lakkineni K, Abrol Y (1999) Photosynthetic characteristics in two wheat genotypes as affected by nitrogen nutrition. Biol Plant 42:217–222
Katayama H, Tachibana M, Iketani H, Zhang SL, Uematsu C (2012) Phylogenetic utility of structural alterations found in the chloroplast genome of pear: hypervariable regions in a highly conserved genome. Tree Genet Genomes 8:313–326
Leblay C, Chevreau E, Raboin LM (1991) Adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro leaves of several pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 25:99–105
Martin SM, Rose D, Hui V (1977) Growth of plant cell suspension cultures with ammonium as the sole source of nitrogen. Can J Bot 55:2838–2843
Mitcham EJ, Elkins RB (eds) (2007) Pear production and handling manual. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland
Mordhorst AP, Lörz H (1993) Embryogenesis and development of isolated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) microspores are influenced by the amount and composition of nitrogen sources in culture media. J Plant Physiol 142:485–492
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Niedz RP, Evens TJ (2006) A solution to the problem of ion confounding in experimental biology. Nat Methods 3:417
Niedz RP, Evens TJ (2007) Regulating plant tissue growth by mineral nutrition. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:370–381
Niedz RP, Evens TJ (2008) The effects of nitrogen and potassium nutrition on the growth of nonembryogenic and embryogenic tissue of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). BMC Plant Biol 8:126
Niedz RP, Hyndman SE, Evens TJ, Weathersbee AA III (2014) Mineral nutrition and in vitro growth of Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 50:458–470
Paques M (1991) Vitrification and micropropagation: causes, remedies and prospects. Acta Hortic 289:283–290
Preece J (1995) Can nutrient salts partially substitute for plant growth regulators? Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol 1:26–37
Ramage CM, Williams RR (2002) Inorganic nitrogen requirements during shoot organogenesis in tobaco leaf discs. J Exp Bot 53:1437–1443
Reed BM, DeNoma JS, Wada S, Postman JD (2013a) Micropropagation of pear (Pyrus sp). In: Lambardi M, Ozudogru EA, Jain SM (eds) Protocols for micropropagation of selected economically-important horticultural plants. Humana Press–Springer, NY, p 554
Reed BM, Wada S, DeNoma J, Niedz RP (2013b) Improving in vitro mineral nutrition for diverse pear germplasm. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 49:343–355
Reed BM, Wada S, DeNoma J, Niedz RP (2013c) Mineral nutrition influences physiological responses of pear in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 49:699–709
Scheible W, González-Fontes A, Lauerer M, Muller-Rober B, Caboche M, Stitta M (1997) Nitrate acts as a signal to induce organic acid metabolism and repress starch metabolism in tobacco. Plant Cell 9:783–798
Sotiropoulos TE, Moutharidou GN, Thomidis T, Tsirakoglou V, Dimassi KN, Therios IN (2005) Effects of different N-sources on growth, nutritional status, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic parameters of shoots of the apple rootstock MM 106 cultured in vitro. Biol Plant 49(2):297–299
Troelstra S, Wagenaar R, Smant W (1995) Nitrogen utilization by plant species from acid heathland soils I. comparison between nitrate and ammonium nutrition at constant low pH. Exp Bot 46:1103–1112
Tsay H, Drew R (1998) Effect of medium compositions at different recultures on vitrification of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) in vitro shoot proliferation. Acta Hortic 243–249
Vincentz M, Moureaux T, Leydecker MT, Vaucheret H, Caboche M (2011) Regulation of nitrate and nitrite reductase expression in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia leaves by nitrogen and carbon metabolites. Plant J 3:315–324
Wada S, Niedz RP, DeNoma J, Reed BM (2013) Mesos components (CaCl2, MgSO4, KH2PO4) are critical for improving pear micropropagation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 49:356–365
Ziv M (1991) Quality of micropropagated plants—vitrification. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 27:64–69
Acknowledgments
We thank the NCGR lab personnel for the assistance with data collection. This project was funded by a grant from the Oregon Association of Nurseries and the Oregon Department of Agriculture and by US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service CRIS project 5358-21000-038-00D.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: John Finer
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wada, S., Niedz, R.P. & Reed, B.M. Determining nitrate and ammonium requirements for optimal in vitro response of diverse pear species. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 51, 19–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9662-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9662-4