Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made comparing robotic (n = 11) and laparoscopic (n = 18) LLS performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2009 and July 2011. Demographic data, operative, and postoperative outcomes were collected.

Results

Demographic and tumor characteristics of robotic and laparoscopic LLS were similar. There were also no significant differences in operative outcomes including estimated blood loss and operating room time. Patients undergoing robotic LLS had more admissions to the ICU (46 versus 6 %), increased rate of minor complications (27 versus 0 %), and longer lengths of stay (4 versus 3 days). There were no significant differences in major complication rates or 90-day mortality. The cost of robotic and laparoscopic LLS was not significantly different when only considering direct costs ($5,130 versus $4,408, p = 0.401). However, robotic LLS costs were significantly greater when including indirect costs, which were estimated to be $1,423 per robotic case ($6,553 versus $4,408, p = 0.021).

Discussion

Robotic LLS yields slightly inferior clinical outcomes and increased cost compared to the laparoscopic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. Laparoscopic liver resection for cancer. Future Oncol. 2008 Oct;4(5):661–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM.. Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg. 2008 Sep;248(3):475–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefor AT, Flowers JL. Laparoscopic wedge biopsy of the liver. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Mar;178(3):307–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogula T, Gagner M. Current status of the laparoscopic approach to liver resection. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14(1):23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samama G, Chiche L, Brefort JL, Le Roux Y. Laparoscopic anatomical hepatic resection. Report of four left lobectomies for solid tumors. Surg Endosc. 1998 Jan;12(1):76–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Rourke N, Fielding G. Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Feb;8(2):213–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gumbs AA, Gayet B. Totally laparoscopic central hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jul;12(7):1153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I, Geller DA, Steel J, Thomas MT, Marvin M, Ravindra KV, Mejia A, Lainas P, Franco D, Cherqui D, Buell JF, Gamblin TC. Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):842–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Chang S, Van Nhieu JT, Loriau J, Karoui M, Duvoux C, Dhumeaux D, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2004–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen HY, Juan CC, Ker CG. Laparoscopic liver surgery for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):800–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, Lainas P, Laurent A, Nguyen KT, Marvin MR, Thomas M, Ravindra K, Fielding G, Franco D,Buell JF. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):856–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS. Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2564–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee KF, Cheung YS, Chong CN, Tsang YY, Ng WW, Ling E, Wong J, Lai PB. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for liver tumours: a case control study. Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Dec;13(6):442–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg. 2007 Sep;246(3):385–92; discussion 92–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitisin K, Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tsung A. A current update on the evolution of robotic liver surgery. Minerva Chir. 2011 Aug;66(4):281–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi SB, Park JS, Kim JK, Hyung WJ, Kim KS, Yoon DS, Lee WJ, Kim BR. Early experiences of robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. Yonsei Med J. 2008 Aug 30;49(4):632–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC. Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;17(4):998–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Idrees K, Bartlett DL. Robotic liver surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;90(4):761–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Benedetti E. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2011 Jul;146(7):844–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg. 2011 Feb;253(2):342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case–control study. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Feb;196(2):236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aldrighetti L, Pulitano C, Catena M, Arru M, Guzzetti E, Casati M, Comotti L, Ferla G. A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJ, Zeidan B, Zeidan S, Hallam MJ, Armstrong T, Primrose JN, Pearce NW. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: A comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;34(12):1285–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang S, Laurent A, Tayar C, Karoui M, Cherqui D. Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomy. Br J Surg. 2007 Jan;94(1):58–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Azagra JS, Goergen M, Brondello S, Calmes MO, Philippe P, Schmitz B. Laparoscopic liver sectionectomy 2 and 3 (LLS 2 and 3): towards the “gold standard”. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):422–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koffron A, Geller D, Gamblin TC, Abecassis M. Laparoscopic liver surgery: Shifting the management of liver tumors. Hepatology. 2006 Dec;44(6):1694–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY, Peng SY. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nguyen KT, Geller DA. Outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec 15;102(8):975–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Vandeweyer H, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2208–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K, Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW, Primrose JN, Sutcliffe RP. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2011 May;13(5):295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B,Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J,Strasberg S, Chari RS. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):772–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):777–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1431–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007 Oct;21(10):1701–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Park BJ, Flores RM. Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug;18(3):297–300, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):453–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rowe CK, Pierce MW, Tecci KC, Houck CS, Mandell J, Retik AB, Nguyen HT. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol. 2012; 26(7):871–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith A, Kurpad R, Lal A, Nielsen M, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):505–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lotan Y. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no. Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jan;22(1):66–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Vignesh Packiam, Samer Tohme, Srinevas Reddy, J. Wallis Marsh, David A. Geller & Allan Tsung

  2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    David L. Bartlett

  3. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Montefiore Hospital, 3459 Fifth Ave., 7 South, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    Allan Tsung

Authors
  1. Vignesh Packiam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David L. Bartlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samer Tohme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Srinevas Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Wallis Marsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David A. Geller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Allan Tsung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Tsung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Packiam, V., Bartlett, D.L., Tohme, S. et al. Minimally Invasive Liver Resection: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 2233–2238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2040-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2040-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation