Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Obstetric and Cryptoglandular Rectovaginal Fistulas: Long-term Surgical Outcome; Quality of Life; and Sexual Function

  • 2010 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair can be challenging. Additionally, women may experience sexual dysfunction and psychosocial ramifications even after a successful repair. The aim of this study was to investigate variables looking for predictors of healing/failure and examine long-term quality-of-life (QOL) and sexual function in women with low RVF from obstetrical or cryptoglandular etiology

Methods

From June 1997–2009, 268 women underwent RVF repair. Of those, 100 with obstetric or cryptoglandular etiology agreed to participate in this study. Healing, type of procedure, use of seton or stoma, number of previous procedures, smoking, age, body mass index (BMI), dyspareunia, QOL using SF-12, FIQL, IBS-QOL, and female sexual function index was obtained from our prospective database and telephone contact. Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and multivariable-logistic-regression model were used to identify the variables associated with healing/failure.

Results

Mean follow-up was 45.8 ± 39.2 months; mean age 42.8 ± 10.5 years; and BMI was 28.8 ± 7.6. Sixty (60%) fistulas were obstetric and 40 (40%) cryptoglandular and 68/100 patients (68%) healed. On multivariate analysis, treatment failure was related to a heavier BMI (p = 0.001) and number of repairs (p = 0.02). Looking at each type of repair, episioproctotomy had significant healing compared to the other choices (but was not significant on multivariate analysis). Forty-seven women were sexually active at follow-up and 12/47 (25.5%) reported dyspareunia. Fecal incontinence was reported preoperatively in 42 women, more often in those with obstetric-related RVF (76% vs. 24% p < 0.05). Healing was not affected by age, smoking, co-morbidities, preoperative seton, or stoma use. Fecal and sexual function and QOL were comparable between women with healed and unhealed RVF.

Conclusion

Patients with higher BMI and more repairs had a decreased healing rate following RVF repair. Despite surgical outcome, QOL and sexual function were surprisingly similar regardless of fistula healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soriano D, Lemoine A, Laplace C, et al. Results of recto-vaginal fistula repair: retrospective analysis of 48 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;96:75–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Given FT, Jr. Rectovaginal fistula. A review of 20 years’ experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;108:41–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Venkatesh KS, Ramanujam PS, Larson DM, et al. Anorectal complications of vaginal delivery. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:1039–1041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308:887–891.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The management of rectovaginal fistulae. Surg Clin North Am 1983;63:61–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsang CB, Rothenberger DA. Rectovaginal fistulas. Therapeutic options. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:95–114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsang CB, Madoff RD, Wong WD, et al. Anal sphincter integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fistula repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1141–1146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ware J, Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hahn BA, Kirchdoerfer LJ, Fullerton S, et al. Evaluation of a new quality of life questionnaire for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997;11:547–552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:9–16; discussion 16–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000;26:191–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rothenberger DA, Christenson CE, Balcos EG, et al. Endorectal advancement flap for treatment of simple rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:297–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilsabeck JR. Transanal advancement of the anterior rectal wall for vaginal fistulas involving the lower rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:236–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldaber KG, Wendel PJ, McIntire DD, et al. Postpartum perineal morbidity after fourth-degree perineal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:489–493.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmerman DD, Delemarre JB, Gosselink MP, et al. Smoking affects the outcome of transanal mucosal advancement flap repair of trans-sphincteric fistulas. Br J Surg 2003;90:351–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazier WP, Senagore AJ, Schiesel EC. Operative repair of anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:4–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozuner G, Hull TL, Cartmill J, et al. Long-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:10–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Russell TR, Gallagher DM. Low rectovaginal fistulas. Approach and treatment. Am J Surg 1977;134:13–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khanduja KS, Padmanabhan A, Kerner BA, et al. Reconstruction of rectovaginal fistula with sphincter disruption by combining rectal mucosal advancement flap and anal sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1432–1437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sonoda T, Hull T, Piedmonte MR, et al. Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1622–1628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Halverson AL, Hull TL, Fazio VW, et al. Repair of recurrent rectovaginal fistulas. Surgery 2001;130:753–757; discussion 757–758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hull TL, Fazio VW. Surgical approaches to low anovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Am J Surg 1997;173:95–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee PY, Fazio VW, Church JM, et al. Vaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:752–759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowry AC, Thorson AG, Rothenberger DA, et al. Repair of simple rectovaginal fistulas. Influence of previous repairs. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:676–678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stone JM, Goldberg SM. The endorectal advancement flap procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:232–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, et al. Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas that has failed previous repair attempts. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:921–925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW. Advancement sleeve flaps for treatment of severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 1998;85:1695–1698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hilton P. Debate: ‘post-operative urinary fistulae should be managed by gynaecologists in specialist centres’. Br J Urol 1997;80 Suppl 1:35–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiskind AK, Thompson JD. Transverse transperineal repair of rectovaginal fistulas in the lower vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:694–699.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Galal El-Gazzaz, Tracy L. Hull, Emilio Mignanelli, Jeffery Hammel, Brooke Gurland & Massarat Zutshi

Authors
  1. Galal El-Gazzaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy L. Hull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emilio Mignanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffery Hammel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brooke Gurland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Massarat Zutshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy L. Hull.

Additional information

Funding

Department of Colorectal Surgery CCF

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Gazzaz, G., Hull, T.L., Mignanelli, E. et al. Obstetric and Cryptoglandular Rectovaginal Fistulas: Long-term Surgical Outcome; Quality of Life; and Sexual Function. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 1758–1763 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1259-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1259-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation