Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sacral Nerve Stimulation Induces Changes in the Pelvic Floor and Rectum that Improve Continence and Quality of Life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) can improve fecal incontinence, though the exact mechanism is not known. This study examines the following hypotheses: SNS leads to contraction of the pelvic floor, influences rectal perception, and improves continence and quality of life.

Methods

Fourteen patients with sacral nerve stimulators implanted for fecal incontinence were examined prospectively. Morphological and functional assessment was done by endosonography, manometry, and volumetry with the stimulator turned on and off in direct succession. Questionnaires were used to determine incontinence and quality of life.

Results

With the stimulator turned on, rectal filling conditions were perceived only at higher volumes; in particular, the defecation urge was sensed only at higher volumes. There was also a reduction in the diameters of the external and internal anal sphincters and a decrease in the distance between the anal mucosa and the symphysis as a sign of pelvic floor elevation. Six months after surgery, continence and quality of life were markedly better than before the operation.

Conclusions

We were able to confirm the hypotheses given above. The improvements of pelvic floor contraction and rectal perception are rapid adjustment processes in response to stimulation of sacral nerves S3/S4 when turning on the stimulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Matthews RJ, Assassa RP, Dallosso H, Williams K, Brittain KR, Azam U, Clarke M, et al. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002;50(4):480–484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Lieber MM, Talley NJ. Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47(7):837–841.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wald A. Faecal incontinence in the elderly: epidemiology and management. Drugs Aging 2005;22(2):131–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Damon H, Schott AM, Barth X, Faucheron JL, Abramowitz L, Siproudhis L, Fayard MO, Colin C, Valancogne G, Bonniaud V, et al. Clinical characteristics and quality of life in a cohort of 621 patients with faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23(9):845–851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobben AC, Terra MP, Berghmans B, Deutekom M, Boeckxstaens GE, Janssen LW, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21(6):515–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MartinezPuenteMdel C, Pascual-Montero JA, Garcia-Olmo D. Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19(3):210–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheetham MJ, Kenefick NJ, Kamm MA. Non-surgical management of faecal incontinence. Hosp Med 2001;62(9):538–541.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, Denis P. Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution. Ann Surg 2003;237(1):52–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baig MK, Wexner SD. Factors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2000;87(10):1316–1330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE. Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2004;91(6):665–672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000;355(9200):260–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G, Maddern GJ. Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2002;89(2):138–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA. Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21(1):52–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Baeten CG, Buie WD, Christiansen J, Wexner S. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44(10):1427–1435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23(1):107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA, Orvis BR. Neural stimulation for control of voiding dysfunction: a preliminary report in 22 patients with serious neuropathic voiding disorders. J Urol 1989;142(2 Pt 1):340–345.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346(8983):1124–1127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, Fraser C, Nicholls RJ, Grant AM, Kamm MA. Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 2004;91(12):1559–1569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, Mion F, Barth X, Rullier E, Bresler L, Portier G, Michot F. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg 2005;242(5):662–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, Madoff R, Mellgren A, Nicholls RJ, Rius J, Rosen H. Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 2004;363(9417):1270–1276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hetzer FH, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Quality of life and morbidity after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Arch Surg 2007;142(1):8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holzer B, Rosen HR, Novi G, Ausch C, Holbling N, Schiessel R. Sacral nerve stimulation for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2007;94(6):749–753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan MK, Tjandra JJ. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51(7):1015–1024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarrett ME, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence related to obstetric anal sphincter damage. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51(5):531–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray-Green C. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51(5):494–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenefick NJ, Christiansen J. A review of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2004;6(2):75–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buhr HJ, Kroesen AJ. The importance of diagnostics in faecal incontinence. Endosonography. Chirurg 2003;74(1):4–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ. Biofeedback in faecal incontinence. Chirurg 2003;74(1):33–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maslekar S, Gardiner A, Maklin C, Duthie GS. Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence. Postgrad Med J 2006;82(968):363–371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M, Gerhards MF, Bijnen AB, Felt-Bersma RJ, Janssen LW, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22(7):783–790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ware JE, Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25(24):3130–3139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen RC, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Medium-term results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2002;89(7):896–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bouvier M, Gonella J. Nervous control of the internal anal sphincter of the cat. J Physiol 1981;310:457–469.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rattan S, Shah R. Influence of sacral nerves on the internal anal sphincter of the opossum. Am J Physiol 1987;253(3 Pt 1):G345–G350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rattan S, Sarkar A, Chakder S. Nitric oxide pathway in rectoanal inhibitory reflex of opossum internal anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1992;103(1):43–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Michelsen HB, Buntzen S, Krogh K, Laurberg S. Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49(7):1039–1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hobday DI, Aziz Q, Thacker N, Hollander I, Jackson A, Thompson DG. A study of the cortical processing of ano-rectal sensation using functional MRI. Brain 2001;124(Pt 2):361–368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dasgupta R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ, Fowler CJ. Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention. J Urol 2005;174(6):2268–2272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Loening-Baucke V, Yamada T. Cerebral potentials evoked by rectal distention in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;88(6):447–452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg 2004;91(6):755–761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Janig W, Koltzenburg M. Receptive properties of sacral primary afferent neurons supplying the colon. J Neurophysiol 1991;65(5):1067–1077.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 2007;9(8):725–730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Dejong CH, Baeten CG. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(8):1350–1357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, Nicholls RJ. Double-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43(3):298–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hetzer FH, Bieler A, Hahnloser D, Lohlein F, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2006;93(11):1411–1417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Herold A, Bruch HP. Staged diagnosis of anorectal incontinence. Zentralbl Chir 1996;121(8):632–638.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36(1):77–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Willis S, Faridi A, Schelzig S, Hoelzl F, Kasperk R, Rath W, Schumpelick V. Childbirth and incontinence: a prospective study on anal sphincter morphology and function before and early after vaginal delivery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002;387(2):101–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany

    Susanne Dorothea Otto, Stefanie Burmeister, Heinz J. Buhr & Anton Kroesen

Authors
  1. Susanne Dorothea Otto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefanie Burmeister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heinz J. Buhr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anton Kroesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Dorothea Otto.

Additional information

Dr. S. Otto and S. Burmeister equally contributed to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otto, S.D., Burmeister, S., Buhr, H.J. et al. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Induces Changes in the Pelvic Floor and Rectum that Improve Continence and Quality of Life. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 636–644 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1122-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1122-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation