Skip to main content
Log in

Complications of dynamic graciloplasty

Incidence, management, and impact on outcome

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic graciloplasty can improve continence in patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence, but associated morbidity is high. The purpose of this study was to identify complications associated with dynamic graciloplasty and to characterize their treatment and impact on patient outcome. METHODS: In 121 patients enrolled in a prospective trial of 20 centers and eligible for safety analysis, all complications of dynamic graciloplasty were recorded at the time of their occurrence and followed up until resolution. Severe treatment-related complications were defined as those requiring hospitalization or surgical intervention. RESULTS: In 93 patients, 211 complications occurred. Of these, 89 (42 percent) in 61 patients were classified as severe treatment-related complications and resulted from the following: major infection, 19; minor infection, 10; thromboembolic events, 3; device performance and use, 13; pain, 16; noninfectious gracilis problems, 8; noninfectious wound-healing problems, 3; other surgery-related complications, 3. In addition, severe treatment-related complications resulted from constipation in ten and stoma creation or closure in ten. The recovery rate (full or partial) was 87 percent overall, and for severe treatment-related complications, was 92 percent. Of the types of complications, only major infections had an adverse effect on outcome. CONCLUSION: Severe complications occur frequently after dynamic graciloplasty, but are usually treatable. They often require one or more reoperations and can lead to significant delays in completion of therapy. In most cases therapy can be salvaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mander BJ, Wexner SD, Williams NS,et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Br J Surg 1999;86:1543–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wexner SD, Gonzalez-Padron A, Rius J,et al. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation: initial experience, pitfalls, and complications. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:957–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG,et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 1999;116:549–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baeten CG, and the Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:743–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty: complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:912–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clagett GP, Anderson FA Jr, Geerts W,et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 1998;114(Suppl):531S-60S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Makela JT, Turku PH, Laitinen ST. Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1997;86:305–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Porter JA, Salvati EP, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE. Complications of colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:299–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1562–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D. Psychological effects of stoma. Psychosocial morbidity one year after surgery. J Psychosom Res 1987;31:311–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

Members of the Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group are listed in the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS section of this article.

Supported by Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota.

About this article

Cite this article

Matzel, K.E., Madoff, R.D., LaFontaine, L.J. et al. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1427–1435 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234593

Key words

Navigation