Abstract
Background
The role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low-risk patients is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients (those without cholelithiasis or cholangitis) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
Multiple databases and abstracts were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic antibiotics to placebo or no antibiotics in low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. The effects of prophylactic antibiotics were analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of overall infections, superficial wound infections, major infections, distant infections, and length of hospital stay. Separate analyses were performed for each outcome by using odds ratio or weighted mean difference. Both random and fixed effects models were used. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by calculating I 2 measure of inconsistency.
Results
Nine RCTs (N = 1,437) met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant reduction was noted for those receiving prophylactic antibiotics and those who did not for overall infectious complications (p = 0.20), superficial wound infections (p = 0.36), major infections (p = 0.97), distant infections (p = 0.28), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.77). No statistically significant publication bias or heterogeneity were noted.
Conclusions
Prophylactic antibiotics do not prevent infections in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, Staroscik RN, Malet PF, McGuckin M, Schwartz JS, Escarce JJ. Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and post laparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 1998;227:343–350.
Chuang SC, Lee KT, Chang WT, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Chen JS, Sheen PC. Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:607–612.
McGuckin M, Shea JA, Schwartz JS. Infection and antimicrobial use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:624–626.
The Southern Surgeon’s club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1073–1078.
Shindholimath VV, Seenu V, Parshad R, Chaudhry R, Kumar A. Factors influencing wound infection following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Trop Gastroenterol 2003;24:90–92.
Uchiyama K, Kawai M, Onishi H, Tasni M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, Yamaue H. Preoperative antimicrobial administration for prevention of postoperative infection in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1955–1959.
Al-Abassi AA, Farghaly MM, Ahmed HL, Mobasher LL, Al-Manee MS. Infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of infected bile and infected gallbladder wall. Eur J Surg 2001;167:268–273.
Harling R, Moorjani N, Perry C, MacGowan AP, Thompson MH. A prospective, randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics versus bag extraction in the prophylaxis of wound infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000;82:408–410.
Higgins A, London J, Charland S, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W, Maher DP. Prophylactic antibiotics for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are they necessary? Arch Surg 1999;134:611–613.
Illig KA, Schmidt E, Cavanaugh J, Krusch D, Sax HC. Are prophylactic antibiotics required for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:353–356.
Tocchi A, Lepre L, Costa G, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Maggiolini F. The need for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 2000;135:67–70.
Mahatharadol V. A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2001;84:105–108.
Dobay KJ, Freier DT, Albear P. The absent role of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 1999;65:226–228.
Koc M, Zulfikaroglu B, Kece C, Ozalp N. A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1716–1718.
Chang WT, Lee KT, Chuang SC, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Chen JS, Sheen PC. The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 2006;191:721–725.
Kuthe SA, Kaman L, Verma GR, Singh R. Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Trop Gastroenterol 2006;27:54–57.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–1558.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2003;327:557–560.
Frantzides CT, Sykes A. A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994;4:375–378.
Orozco H, Sifuentes-Osorio J, Chan C, Medina-Franco H, Vargas- Vorackova F, Prado E, Arch J. Comparison of ceftibuten vs. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as antibiotic prophylaxis in cholecystectomy and/or biliary tract surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:606–610.
Pourriat JL, The French Multicentric Group. Antibiotic prophylaxis of laparoscopic cholecystectomies with 1 versus 2 grams of cefotetan. Rec Adv Chemother 1995;19:554–556.
Zurbuchen U, Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Groene J, Heidari M, Buhr HJ, Germer CT. Oral vs intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy-an exploratory trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393(4):479–85. (Jul).
Acknowledgments
No additional acknowledgments. No grant support or external funding were utilized.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Discussion
John B. Marshall, M.D. (Columbia, MO): This is a practical paper that has the potential to change practice habits. A majority of surgeons presently give prophylactic antibiotics before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While randomized controlled trials have not shown a benefit, a number of the trials have been underpowered and not included enough subjects to exclude a benefit. Meta-analysis is a statistical technique that permits the results of different studies to be combined. The results of this well-conducted meta-analysis found no benefit from prophylactic antibiotics given before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is an important finding given the cost implications and various other potential deleterious effects of prescribing unwarranted antibiotics. Most of the trials in this study excluded so-called high-risk patients, though the various studies tended to define high risk in various ways. Additional investigation is needed in the high-risk subset. However, the verdict seems clear in most patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, prophylactic antibiotics are not needed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhary, A., Bechtold, M.L., Puli, S.R. et al. Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 1847–1853 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0681-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0681-x