Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis

  • 2008 plenary presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low-risk patients is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients (those without cholelithiasis or cholangitis) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Multiple databases and abstracts were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic antibiotics to placebo or no antibiotics in low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. The effects of prophylactic antibiotics were analyzed by calculating pooled estimates of overall infections, superficial wound infections, major infections, distant infections, and length of hospital stay. Separate analyses were performed for each outcome by using odds ratio or weighted mean difference. Both random and fixed effects models were used. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by calculating I 2 measure of inconsistency.

Results

Nine RCTs (N = 1,437) met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant reduction was noted for those receiving prophylactic antibiotics and those who did not for overall infectious complications (p = 0.20), superficial wound infections (p = 0.36), major infections (p = 0.97), distant infections (p = 0.28), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.77). No statistically significant publication bias or heterogeneity were noted.

Conclusions

Prophylactic antibiotics do not prevent infections in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, Staroscik RN, Malet PF, McGuckin M, Schwartz JS, Escarce JJ. Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and post laparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 1998;227:343–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang SC, Lee KT, Chang WT, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Chen JS, Sheen PC. Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:607–612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGuckin M, Shea JA, Schwartz JS. Infection and antimicrobial use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:624–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. The Southern Surgeon’s club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1073–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shindholimath VV, Seenu V, Parshad R, Chaudhry R, Kumar A. Factors influencing wound infection following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Trop Gastroenterol 2003;24:90–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Uchiyama K, Kawai M, Onishi H, Tasni M, Kinoshita H, Ueno M, Yamaue H. Preoperative antimicrobial administration for prevention of postoperative infection in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1955–1959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Abassi AA, Farghaly MM, Ahmed HL, Mobasher LL, Al-Manee MS. Infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of infected bile and infected gallbladder wall. Eur J Surg 2001;167:268–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harling R, Moorjani N, Perry C, MacGowan AP, Thompson MH. A prospective, randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics versus bag extraction in the prophylaxis of wound infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000;82:408–410.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins A, London J, Charland S, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W, Maher DP. Prophylactic antibiotics for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are they necessary? Arch Surg 1999;134:611–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Illig KA, Schmidt E, Cavanaugh J, Krusch D, Sax HC. Are prophylactic antibiotics required for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:353–356.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tocchi A, Lepre L, Costa G, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Maggiolini F. The need for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 2000;135:67–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahatharadol V. A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2001;84:105–108.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobay KJ, Freier DT, Albear P. The absent role of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 1999;65:226–228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koc M, Zulfikaroglu B, Kece C, Ozalp N. A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1716–1718.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang WT, Lee KT, Chuang SC, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Chen JS, Sheen PC. The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 2006;191:721–725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuthe SA, Kaman L, Verma GR, Singh R. Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Trop Gastroenterol 2006;27:54–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2003;327:557–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frantzides CT, Sykes A. A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994;4:375–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Orozco H, Sifuentes-Osorio J, Chan C, Medina-Franco H, Vargas- Vorackova F, Prado E, Arch J. Comparison of ceftibuten vs. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as antibiotic prophylaxis in cholecystectomy and/or biliary tract surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:606–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pourriat JL, The French Multicentric Group. Antibiotic prophylaxis of laparoscopic cholecystectomies with 1 versus 2 grams of cefotetan. Rec Adv Chemother 1995;19:554–556.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zurbuchen U, Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Groene J, Heidari M, Buhr HJ, Germer CT. Oral vs intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy-an exploratory trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393(4):479–85. (Jul).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No additional acknowledgments. No grant support or external funding were utilized.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen K. Roy.

Additional information

Discussion

John B. Marshall, M.D. (Columbia, MO): This is a practical paper that has the potential to change practice habits. A majority of surgeons presently give prophylactic antibiotics before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While randomized controlled trials have not shown a benefit, a number of the trials have been underpowered and not included enough subjects to exclude a benefit. Meta-analysis is a statistical technique that permits the results of different studies to be combined. The results of this well-conducted meta-analysis found no benefit from prophylactic antibiotics given before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is an important finding given the cost implications and various other potential deleterious effects of prescribing unwarranted antibiotics. Most of the trials in this study excluded so-called high-risk patients, though the various studies tended to define high risk in various ways. Additional investigation is needed in the high-risk subset. However, the verdict seems clear in most patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, prophylactic antibiotics are not needed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choudhary, A., Bechtold, M.L., Puli, S.R. et al. Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 1847–1853 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0681-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0681-x

Keywords

Navigation