Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has a low risk for infective complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The use of prophylactic antibiotics for LC is inconsistent and varies widely among surgeons. Methods: We performed a prospective double-blind randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective LC. Antibiotics were was given first before the operation and then again 24 h afterward. Group A (n = 49) received 2 g of cefotaxime; group B (n = 43) received 10 ml of isotonic sodium chloride solution. A sample of bile was withdrawn by direct gallbladder puncture for anaerobic and aerobic cultures. Age, sex, weight, duration of surgery (DOS), presence of diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, gallbladder rupture, bile and/or stone spillage, gallbladder histological findings, findings from bile cultures positive for bacteria, episodes of colic within 30 days before surgery, length of stay (LOS), and number of septic complications were recorded for both groups. Results: There was no differences between the two groups in terms of sex, weight, DOS, ASA score, gallbladder rupture, bile and/or stone spillage, gallbladder histological findings, findings from bile cultures positive for bacteria, or LOS. One infection occurred in the antibiotic prophylaxis group (2.04%); in the patients not receiving antibiotics, there was one other infection (2.32%). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in infective complications. Conclusion: In patients undergoing elective LC, antibiotic prophylaxis is justified only in high-risk patients. In all other patients, antibiotic prophylaxis does not seem to affect the incidence of postoperative infective complications. In low-risk patients, eliminating the unnecessary use of prophylactic antibiotics would result in a cost reduction; moreover, it would lower the risk of adverse reaction and reduce microbial resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I Heineck MBC Ferreira EP Schenkel (1999) ArticleTitlePrescribing practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 commonly performed surgeries in a teaching hospital in Brazil. J Infect Control 27 296–300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3oslOisw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A Higgins J London S Charland E Ratzer J Clark W Haun P Maher (1999) ArticleTitleProphylactic antibiotics for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are they necessary? Arch Surg 134 611–614 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.6.611 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3psVaruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10367869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. RW Ikard (1990) ArticleTitleGallstones, cholecystitis and diabetes. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171 528–532 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D2MjnsVM%3D Occurrence Handle2244290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. KA Illig E Schmidt J Cavanaugh D Krusch HC Sax (1997) ArticleTitleAre prophylactic antibiotics required for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Am Coll Surg 184 353–356 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2MrjtlY%3D Occurrence Handle9100679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. M McGuckin JA Shea JS Schwartz (1999) ArticleTitleInfection and antimicrobial use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20 624–626 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvivFeksA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10501264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WS Meijer PIM Schmitz J Jeekel (1990) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis of randomised, controlled clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. Br J Surg 77 283–290 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB3Mzht1w%3D Occurrence Handle2138925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JA Shea MJ Healey JA Berlin JR Clarke PF Malet RN Staroscik JS Schwartz SV Williams (1996) ArticleTitleMortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224 609–620 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2svksV0%3D Occurrence Handle8916876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. InstitutionalAuthorNameSouthern Surgeons Club (1992) ArticleTitleA prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  9. S Tierney HA Pitt KD Lillemoe (1993) ArticleTitlePhysiology and patophysiology of gallbladder motility. Surg Clin North Am 73 1267–1290 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD28bjvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8248838

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A Tocchi L Lepre G Costa G Liotta G Mazzoni F Maggiolini (2000) ArticleTitleThe need for prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 135 67–70 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.1.67 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7gtVejtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10636350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Zulfikaroglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koc, M., Zulfikaroglu, B., Kece, C. et al. A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy . Surg Endosc 17, 1716–1718 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8866-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8866-y

Keywords

Navigation