Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Features and Management of Postoperative Pouch Bleeding after Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis (IPAA)

  • ssat poster presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Aim

The clinical features of postoperative bleeding from the ileal pouch–anal anastomosis(IPAA) vary and its management can be difficult. There is no published literature regarding pouch bleeding and its treatment.

Materials and Methods

Pouch bleeding was defined as the passage of blood or clots transanally or into the ileostomy bag with or without hypotension or a drop in hemoglobin within 30 days after surgery. Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained pouch database.

Results

Pouch bleeding developed in 47 (1.5%) patients out of 3,194 patients undergoing IPAA since 1983. Forty-two patients had inflammatory bowel disease, four had familial adenomatous polyposis, and one had colonic inertia. Sixty-six percent of bleeding occurred within 7 days postoperatively and 59.6% required transfusion; 72.3% patients developed transanal bleeding, nine from ileostomy and two from both. After initial fluid resuscitation, five patients were observed while 28 patients had pouch endoscopy and clot evacuation followed by cauterization or epinephrine(1:100,000) enemas, 27 of these had cessation within 24 h. Epinephrine enema was used as initial treatment in the remaining 12 patients. Overall success rate of epinephrine enema was 96%.

Conclusion

Postoperative pouch bleeding after IPAA is uncommon, and it usually requires nonsurgical intervention. Epinephrine enema appears to be successful in managing this complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 1978;2:85–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholls RJ. Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir. World J Surg 1987;11:751–62. doi:10.1007/BF01656598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McHugh SM, Diamant NE, McLeod R, et al. S-pouches vs. J-pouches. A comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:671–77. doi:10.1007/BF02561686.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, Matsuo S, Sawai S, Yaegashi K, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen B, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, Lashner BA. Clinical approach to diseases of ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2796–807. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00278.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, et al. Ileal pouch–anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120–7. doi:10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ballantyne GH, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG, Dozois RR. Ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Current technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:197–202. doi:10.1007/BF02554246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farouk R, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Functional outcomes after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2000;231:919–26. doi:10.1097/00000658-200006000-00017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen B, Remzi FH, Lavery IC, Lashner BA, Fazio VW. A proposed classification of ileal pouch disorders and associated complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:145–58. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes JP, Bauer AR Jr, Bauer CM. Stapling techniques for easy construction of an ileal J-pouch. Am J Surg 1988;155:783–5. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80043-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothenberger DA, Vermeulen FD, Christenson CE, Balcos EG, Nemer FD, Goldberg SM, et al. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1983;145:82–8. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(83)90171-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau JY, Chung S. Management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15(Suppl):G8–12. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02258.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YI, Marcon NE. Injection therapy for colonic diverticular bleeding. A case study. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993;17:46–8. doi:10.1097/00004836-199307000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert JP. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;18:CD005584.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor W. Fazio.

Additional information

This abstract was presented as a poster at the Digestive Disease Week 2008, San Diego.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lian, L., Serclova, Z., Fazio, V.W. et al. Clinical Features and Management of Postoperative Pouch Bleeding after Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis (IPAA). J Gastrointest Surg 12, 1991–1994 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0611-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0611-y

Keywords

Navigation