Abstract
Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are designed to monitor and/or stimulate extracellularly neuronal activity. However, the biomechanical and structural mismatch between current MEAs and neural tissues remains a challenge for neural interfaces. This article describes a material strategy to prepare neural electrodes with improved mechanical compliance that relies on thin metal film electrodes embedded in polymeric substrates. The electrode impedance of micro-electrodes on polymer is comparable to that of MEA on glass substrates. Furthermore, MEAs on plastic can be flexed and rolled offering improved structural interface with brain and nerves in vivo. MEAs on elastomer can be stretched reversibly and provide in vitro unique platforms to simultaneously investigate the electrophysiological of neural cells and tissues to mechanical stimulation. Adding mechanical compliance to MEAs is a promising vehicle for robust and reliable neural interfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrega T, Lacour SP (2010) Stretchable conductors embedded in PDMS and patterned by photolithography: fabrication and electromechanical characterisation. J Micromech Microeng 20:055025
Benmerah S et al (2009) Design and fabrication of neural implant with thick micro-channels based on flexible polymeric materials. Presented at the IEEE EMBS conference, Minneapolis
Cheng I-C, Wagner S (2009) Overview of flexible electronics technology. In: Wong WS, Salleo A (eds) Flexible electronics—materials and applications. Springer, New York, pp 1–28
Discher DE et al (2005) Cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143
Donaldson N et al (2008) Noise and selectivity of velocity-selective multi-electrode nerve cuffs. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:1005–1018
Edell DJ (1986) A peripheral nerve information transducer for amputees: long-term multichannel recordings from rabbit peripheral nerves. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 33:203–214
Fejtl M (2006) On micro-electrode array revival: its development, sophistication of recording, and stimulation. In: Taketani M, Baudry M et al (eds) Advances in network electrophysiology. Using multi-electrode arrays. Springer, Berlin, pp 24–37
FitzGerald J et al (2008) Microchannels as axonal amplifiers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1136–1146
FitzGerald J et al (2009) Microchannel electrodes for recording and stimulation: in vitro evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:1524–1534
Fontaine D et al (2010) Anatomical location of effective deep brain stimulation electrodes in chronic cluster headache. Brain 133:1214–1223
Graudejus O et al (2009) Characterization of an elastically stretchable microelectrode array and its application to neural field potential recordings. J Electrochem Soc 156:P85–P94
Graz I et al (2009) Extended cyclic uniaxial loading of stretchable gold thin-films on elastomeric substrates. Appl Phys Lett 94:071902
Haftek J (1970) Stretch injury of peripheral nerve. J Bone Joint Surg 52B:354–365
Hai A et al (2009) Changing gears from chemical adhesion of cells to flat substrata toward engulfment of micro-protusions by active mechanisms. J Neural Eng 6:0066009
Hetke JF, Anderson DJ (2003) Silicon microelectrodes for extracellular recording. In: Finn WE, LoPresti PG (eds) Handbook of neuroprosthetic methods, chapter 7. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Hochberg L et al (2006) Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442:164–171
http://professional.medtronic.com/devices/activa-pc/overview/index.htm, 2010
Janmey PA et al (2009) The hard life of soft cells. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 66:597–605
Kim S et al (2009) Integrated wireless neural interfaces based on the Utah electrode array. Biomed Microdevices 11:453–466
Krause M et al (2000) Extended gate electrode arrays for extracellular signal recordings. Sens Actuators B 70:101–107
Lacour SP (2009) Long micro-channel electrode arrays: a novel type of regenerative peripheral nerve interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng (vol. online)
Lacour SP et al (2005) Stretchable micro-electrode arrays for dynamic neuronal recording of in vitro mechanically injured brain. In: Proceedings of the fourth IEEE conference on sensors, pp 617–620
Lacour SP et al (2006) Mechanisms of reversible stretchability of thin metal films on elastomeric substrates. Appl Phys Lett 88:204103-1–204103-3
Lacour SP et al (2008) Polyimide micro-channel arrays for peripheral nerve regenerative implants. Sens Actuators A 147:456–463
Maghribi M et al (2002) Stretchable micro-electrode array. In: Second annual international IEEE-EMBS special topic conference on microtechnologies in medicine and biology, pp 80–83
Meacham KW et al (2008) A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord. Biomed Microdevices 10:259–269
Morrison B et al (1998) In vitro central nervous system models of mechanically induced trauma: a review. J Neurotrauma 15:911–928
Morrison B et al (2006) An in vitro model of traumatic brain injury utilising two-dimensional stretch of organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. J Neurosci Methods 150:192–201
Moshayedi P et al (2010) Mechanosensitivity of astrocytes on optimized polyacrylamide gels analyzed by quantitative morphometry. J Phys Condens Matter 22:194114
MultiChannelSystems (2010, 21/05/2010) Microelectrode arrays
Navarro X et al (2005) A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems. J Peripher Nerv Syst 10:229–258
Périchon-Lacour S et al (2003) Stretchable gold conductors on elastomeric substrates. Appl Phys Lett 82:2404–2406
Polasek H et al (2009) Intraoperative evaluation of the spiral nerve cuff electrode on the femoral nerve trunk. J Neural Eng 6:066005
Polikov VS et al (2005) Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J Neurosci Methods 148:1–18
Rehfeldt F et al (2007) Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment—implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:1329–1339
Rutten WLC et al (1995) 3D neuroelectronic interface devices for neuromuscular control: design studies and realisation steps. Biosens Bioelectr 10:141–153
Suo Z et al (1999) Mechanics of rollable and foldable film-on-foil electronics. Appl Phys Lett 74:1177–1179
Wagner S et al (2005) Chapter 14: mechanics of TFT technology on flexible substrates. In: Crawford GP (ed) Flexible flat panel displays. Wiley, Chichester, pp 263–283
Williams JC et al (2007) Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants. J Neural Eng 4:410–423
Wilson BS, Dorman MF (2008) Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res 242:3–21
Yoshida K, Riso R (2004) Peripheral nerve recording electrodes and techniques. In: Horch KW, Dhillon GS (eds) Neuroprosthetics. Theory and practice. World Scientific Publishing Co., New Jersey, pp 683–744
Yu Z et al (2009) Monitoring hippocampus electrical activity in vitro on an elastically deformable microelectrode array. J Neurotrauma 26:1135–1145
Zhang L et al (2001) Biomechanics of brain trauma. Neurol Res 23:144–156
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the NINDS R21 0527794 and the NJ Commission on Science and Technology for BM, ZH, OG, the EPSRC-MRC Basic Technology Program (EP/C52330X) for SB, ET, IM, JF, SM, an MRC/Royal College of Surgeons of England fellowship for JF, and a University Research Fellowship of the Royal Society for SPL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacour, S.P., Benmerah, S., Tarte, E. et al. Flexible and stretchable micro-electrodes for in vitro and in vivo neural interfaces. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 945–954 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0644-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0644-8