Abstract
The study employs a narrative inquiry approach to probe a Chinese doctoral student’s identity construction experiences fraught with interruption and transformation. The longitudinal narratives gathered through participant entries in Evernote, a face-to-face life story interview, and researcher memos, have enabled a dynamic configuration of the intellectual, social, emotional, and spiritual dimensions characterizing doctoral identity development. Using identity-trajectory as an analytical lens, the study highlights how individual agency is embodied and exercised in institutional, relational, and personal spaces where doctoral identity is formed and contested. Findings are episodically ordered as: beginning doctoral study with great expectations; conceptualizing the nature of becoming a doctoral student; forces that are disruptive to the development of the doctoral-researcher identity; the ongoing process of being mediated by socialization into an extended research community, socio-professional support, and agentic reflexivity over time. The study argues for using narrative inquiry to speak of and express the subtleties and continuities of doctoral students’ experiences. It also provides practical implications for action by supervisors and students in doctoral programs respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. (2007). The life story interview as a bridge in narrative inquiry. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 224–245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bach, H. (2007). Composing a visual narrative inquiry. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 280–309). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903501887
Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctoral student to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.515569
Bao, Y. H., Kehm, B. M., & Ma, Y. H. (2016). From product to process: The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1182481
Barnes, B. J., Williams, E. A., & Archer, S. A. (2010). Characteristics that matter most: Doctoral students’ perceptions of positive and negative advisor attributes. Nacada Journal, 30(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-30.L34
Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Corcelles, M., Cano, M., Liesa, E., González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2019). Positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1602596
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cullen, D. J., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Sage.
González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2018). How do doctoral students experience supervision? Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520208
Griffith, A. I. (1998). Insider/outsider: Epistemological privilege and mothering work. Human Studies 21, 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005421211078
Gu, J. B., Lin, Y., Vogel, D., & Tian, W. (2011). What are the major impact factors on research performance of young doctorate holders in science in China: A USTC survey. Higher Education, 62(4), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9400-0
Guerin, C., Jayatilaka, A., & Ranasinghe, D. (2015). Why start a higher degree by research? An exploratory factor analysis of motivations to undertake doctoral studies. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360. 2014.934663
Hall, L., & Burns, L. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345
Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220124648
Heinrich, K. T. (2000). The passionate scholar: A mid-life, woman doctoral student’s quest for voice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183900235735
Hopwood, N. (2010). A sociocultural view of doctoral students’ relationships and agency. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037-X.2010.487482
Huang, J. C. (2010). Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES PhD students in science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 33–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/joeap.2009.10.001
Jairam, D., & Kahl, D. H. Jr. (2012). Navigating the doctoral experience: The role of social support in successful degree completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7, 311–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.28945/1700
Jung, J. (2018). Learning experience and perceived competencies of doctoral students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9530-0
Lei, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideologies in a Chinese university’s requirements and rewards schemes for doctoral publication. Studies in Continuing Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1672638
Lei, J., & Hu, G. W. (2019). Doctoral candidates’ dual role as student and expert scholarly writer: An activity theory perspective. English for Specific Purposes 54, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.12.003
Li, Y. Y. (2016). “Publish SCI papers or no degree” Practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1005050
Lin, J., & Chao, Y. Q. (2019). 师门对研究生发展的影响: 基于非正式组织理论的质性研 究 [Impact of “supervisor-postgraduate fellowship” on the development of postgraduates: Qualitative research based on informal organization theory]. 研究生教育研究 [Journal of Graduate Education], 53(5), 1–8.
Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2020). What are ethics in doctoral supervision, and how do they matter? Doctoral students’ perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595711
Mackie, S. A., & Bates, G. W. (2019). Contribution of the doctoral education environment to PhD candidates’ mental health problems: A scoping review. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(3), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1556620
Mantai, L. (2017). Feeling like a researcher: Experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603
Mantai, L. (2019). “Feeling more academic now” Doctoral stories of becoming an academic. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0283-x
McAlpine, L. (2010). Fixed-term researchers in the social sciences: Passionate investment, yet marginalizing experiences. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2010.497686
McAlpine, L. (2012). Identity-trajectories: Doctoral journeys from past to present to future. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 38–16.
McAlpine, L. (2013). Doctoral supervision: Not an individual but a collective institutional responsibility. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 36(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037013807533061
McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927378
McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience in education: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/1759751X201100007
McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision—The most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227
McAlpine, L., Paulson, J., Gonsalves, A., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2012). “Untold” doctoral stories: Can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559199
Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2
Rhoads, R. A., Zheng, M., & Sun, X. Y. (2017). The methodological socialization of social science doctoral students in China and the USA. Higher Education, 73(2), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0023-y
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014
Shin, J. C., Postiglione, G. A., & Ho, K. C. (2018). Challenges for doctoral education in East Asia: A global and comparative perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9542-9
Smith, J. (2011). Agency and female teachers’ career decisions: A life history study of 40 women. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210383900
Soong, H., Thi Tran, L., & Hoa Hiep, P. (2015). Being and becoming an intercultural doctoral student: Reflective autobiographical narratives. Reflective Practice, 16(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1023276
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13(1), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
Teng, F. (2020). A narrative inquiry of identity construction in academic communities of practice: Voices from a Chinese doctoral student in Hong Kong. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 15(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2019.1673164
Walsh, E. (2010). A model of research group microclimate: Environmental and cultural factors affecting the experiences of overseas research students in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903243092
Wang, L. H., & Byram, M. (2019). International doctoral students’ experience of supervision: A case study in a Chinese university. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1518405
Ye, L., & Edwards, V. (2017). A narrative inquiry into the identity formation of Chinese doctoral students in relation to study abroad. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(6), 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1294570
Yuan, R. (2017). “This game is not easy to play” A narrative inquiry into a novice EFL teacher educator’s research and publishing experiences. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 474–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1182936
Zheng, G. M. (2019). Deconstructing doctoral students’ socialization from an institutional logics perspective: A qualitative study of the socialization of Chinese doctoral students in Finland. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0011-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Trent, J. Ongoing Doctoral Study Process to Live by: A Narrative Inquiry into the Doctoral Identity Construction Experiences—A Chinese Case. Front Educ China 15, 422–452 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0018-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0018-4