Abstract
For this study the researchers designed learning activities to enhance students’ high level cognitive processes. Students learned new information in a classroom setting and then applied and analyzed their new knowledge in familiar authentic contexts by taking pictures of objects found there, describing them, and sharing their homework with peers. An experiment was carried out in which 58 junior high school students were divided into a control (n = 30) and an experimental (n = 28) group. The control group studied and completed learning activities with traditional textbooks while the experimental group used electronic textbooks and a learning system, Virtual Pen for Tablet PC (VPenTPC), in order to gauge the feasibility of the proposed approach. The post-test results show a significant difference between the control and experimental groups. In our analysis of the various approaches students took to complete the task, we were able to identify thirty cognitive and metacognitive strategies for using mobile technology, from which we selected the ten most frequently used ones. The results show that low ability students make better use of strategies than their high ability peers, resulting in significant learning gains. The results also show that most students perceive VPenTPC positively. Based on these results, we suggest some implications along with conclusions and directions for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(2), 167–207.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Caldwell, S. (1998). Going the distance with online instruction. VSTE Journal, 13(1), 3–6.
Chen, X. B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning and Technology, 17(1), 20–36.
Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive Load-A format assessment perspective. Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 332–344.
Dashtestani, R. (2015). Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students’ use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (ahead-of-print), 1-18.
Gabarre, C., Gabarre, S., Din, R., Shah, P. M., & Karim, A. A. (2014). iPads in the foreign language classroom: A learner’s perspective. Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(1), 115–127.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.
Guha, M. L., Druin, A., Montemayor, J., Chipman, G., & Farber, A. (2007). A theoretical model of children’s storytelling using physically-oriented technologies (SPOT). Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(4), 389–410.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of english language teaching. London: Longman.
Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327–339.
Hung, C. Y., Sun, J. C. Y., & Yu, P. T. (2015a). The benefits of a challenge: student motivation and flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 1–19.
Hung, H. C., Young, S. S. C., & Lin, C. P. (2015b). No student left behind: a collaborative and competitive game-based learning environment to reduce the achievement gap of EFL students in Taiwan. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 35–49.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S. L., Shadiev, R., Huang, Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2014a). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 359–378.
Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M., Shadiev, R., Wu, S. Y., & Chen, S. L. (2014b). Effects of using mobile devices on English listening diversity and speaking for EFL elementary students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 503–516.
Hwang, W. Y., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., Shih, T. K., & Chen, S. Y. (2016a). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639–657.
Hwang, W. Y., & Shadiev, R. (2014). Cognitive diffusion model with user-oriented context-to-text recognition for learning to promote high level cognitive processes. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 6(1), 30–48.
Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J. L., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, G. L., & Lin, Y. C. (2016b). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using Web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 215–241.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(4), 338–354.
Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning and Technology, 18(2), 20–35.
Kim, S. Y., & Kim, M. R. (2012). Kolb’s learning styles and educational outcome: Using digital mind map as a study tool in elementary english class. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 6(1), 4–13.
Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9376-7.
Kuo, T. C. T., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Effects of applying STR for group learning activities on learning performance in a synchronous cyber classroom. Computers and Education, 58(1), 600–608.
Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning and Technology, 11(3), 130–151.
Lee, I. S. (2002). Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within Korea’s university context. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 101–111.
Lin, C. C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers and Education, 78, 48–59.
Nilson, L. B. (2010). teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. San Francisco: Wiley.
Oh, J., Lee, H. K., Park, M., & Cho, Y. (2014). Exploring the effects of tablet pc-based english learning. English Teaching, 69(3), 151–176.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley: Newbury House.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The journal of the learning sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
Shadiev, R., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). Facilitating cross-cultural understanding with learning activities supported by speech-to-text recognition and computer-aided translation. Computers and Education, 98, 130–141.
Shadiev, R., Huang, Y.M., Hwang, W.Y., & Liu, T.Y. (in press). Cognitive model: A study on facilitating students’ cognitive process of EFL learning with authentic support. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2016.2574356
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Liu, T. Y. (2015). The impact of supported and annotated mobile learning on achievement and cognitive load. Educational Technology and Society, 18(4), 53–69.
Shen, C. H., & Chern, C. L. (2014). English story reading and writing via tablet PCs: Perceptions of students and teachers. Journal of English Education, 3(1), 61–92.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673–695.
Wang, J. Y., Wu, H. K., Chien, S. P., Hwang, F. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). Designing applications for physics learning: Facilitating high school students’ conceptual understanding by using tablet pcs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 441–458.
Woolfolk, A. (2005). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wright, A. (1995). Storytelling with children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgments
This research is partially supported by the “International Research-Intensive Center of Excellence Pro-gram” of NTNU and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant Nos. NSC 103-2911-I-003-301, MOST 103-2511-S-006-007- MY3, and MOST 103-2511-S-006-002-MY3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, YM., Shadiev, R., Sun, A. et al. A study of the cognitive diffusion model: facilitating students’ high level cognitive processes with authentic support. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 505–531 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9475-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9475-0