Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From empowerment to response-ability: rethinking socio-spatial, environmental justice, and nature-culture binaries in the context of STEM education

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, we draw upon the insights of Feminist Science Studies, in particular Karen Barad’s concept of agential realism, as a critical analytical tool to re-think nature and culture binaries in dominant science knowledge-making practices and explanatory accounts, and their possible implications for science education in the context of socio-spatial and environmental injustices. Barad’s framework proposes a relational and more expansive approach to justice, which takes into account consequential effects of nature-culture practices on humans, non-humans, and more than human vitalities. In efforts to understand potentialities of Barad’s theory of agential realism, we situate our argument in the “story” of local children who encounter a bottle of cyanide in a former manufacturing building. The story takes place in a post-industrial urban city located in the U.S., caught up in an inverse relationship between the technological and scientific advances observed “globally” and the deteriorating environmental and living conditions experienced “locally” as the result of erstwhile industrial activity. Based on agential realist readings of the story and taking into consideration children’s developing subjectivities, we argue that equity-oriented scholarship in science education might not be able to achieve justice devoid of understanding of the relatedness to plurality of life forms. We invite our readers to consider (re)configuring socio-spatial and environmental issues as an ethical response-ability that is constituted through relationships of care, recognition, openness, and responsiveness to vitalities of humans and nonhumans equally, one which cannot be conceptualized from a priori and distant calculations, but rather continuous entangled relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. W. (2008). Can schooling contribute to a more just society? Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197908095134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaut, K. (2011). The human zoo after Abu Ghraib: Performance and subalternity in the ‘cam era’. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 11, 1–24.

  • Atweh, B. (2011). Reflections on social justice, race, ethnicity and identity from an ethical perspective. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-93053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2010). Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1754850010000813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2012). Interview with Karen Barad. In I. Van der Tuin & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 48–70). Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile, V., & Lopez, E. (2015). And still I see no changes: Enduring views of students of color in science and mathematics education policy reports. Science Education, 99(3), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, V., & Murray, K. (2015). Uncovering the need for diversity among K–12 STEM educators. Teacher Education and Practice, 28(2/3), 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(3), 284–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2017). ‘STEPPING’ toward a critical-activist science education: Dialoguing subjectivity, social ontology and multiplicities. In J. L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments (pp. 613–624). Dorecht: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2018). Exploring ethical relations to self and new ontologies. In G. Reis, M. Mueller, R. Gisewhite, L. Siveres, & R. Brito (Eds.), Sociocultural perspectives on youth ethical consumerism (pp. 101–114). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65608-3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 648–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boslaugh, S. (2013). Anthropocentrism. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/anthropocentrism.

  • Braidotti, R. (2012). Interview with Rosi Braidotti. In I. Van der Tuin & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 19–37). Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L., Scammell, M., & Benson, E. (2016). The Flint, Michigan, water crisis: A case study in regulatory failure and environmental injustice. Environmental Justice, 9, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2016.0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese-Barton, A., & Upadhyay, B. (2010). Teaching and learning science for social justice: Introduction to the special issue. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903484917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. P., Millet, D. B., & Marshall, J. D. (2014). National patterns in environmental injustice and inequality: Outdoor NO2 air pollution in the United States. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. G. (2007). Expanding the field: Revisiting environmental education principles through multidisciplinary frameworks. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.3200/joee.38.1.35-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dance, L. (2002). Tough fronts: The impact of street culture on schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2012). Interview with Manuel DeLanda. In I. Van der Tuin & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 38–47). Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimick, A. (2012). Student empowerment in an environmental science classroom: Toward a framework for social justice science education. Science Education, 96, 990–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobscha, S., & Ozanne, J. L. (2001). An ecofeminist analysis of environmentally sensitive women using qualitative methodology: The emancipatory potential of an ecological life. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.20.2.201.17360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1990). The technological bluff. (G. Bromiley, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdmans Publishing Company.

  • Feynman, R. P. (1995). Six easy pieces: Essentials of physics explained by its most brilliant teacher. In Reading: Helix Books (selected chapters from The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 13, RP Feynman, Reading: Addison-Wesley, 19631965).

  • Frost, S. (2011). The implications of the new materialisms for feminist epistemology. In H. E. Grasswick (Ed.), Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge (pp. 69–83). Dorecht: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. B., & Guerra, P. L. (2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503261322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (2002). Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Framing equity: Helping students “play the game” and “change the game”. Teaching for excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 1(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2017). Living mathematx: Towards a vision for the future. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1994). A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (1952). The economics of New England: Economics of an older area. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufnagel, E., Kelly, G. J., & Henderson, J. A. (2017). How the environment is positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards: A critical discourse analysis. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1334876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iovino, S. (2012). Material ecocriticism: Matter, text, and posthuman ethics. In S. Iovino & S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material ecocriticism: Materiality, agency, and models of narrativity (pp. 51–68). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Tippins, D. J., & Kayumova, S. (2017). A story of chicks, science fairs and the ethics of students’ biomedical research. In M. P. Mueller, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Animals and science education: Ethics, curriculum and pedagogy (Vol. 2, pp. 99–122). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56375-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1973). What is Enlightenment? In Peter Gay (Ed.), The enlightenment: A comprehensive anthology (pp. 383–389). New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayumova, S., Karsli, E., Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Buxton, C. (2015). Latina mothers and daughters: Ways of knowing, being, and becoming in the context of bilingual family science workshops. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 46(3), 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayumova, S., & Tippins, D. (2016). Toward re-thinking science education in terms of affective practices: Reflections from the field. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9695-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883:aid-tea1>3.0.co;2-i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Mulkay, M. (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. (2004). The making of environmental law. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296:aid-tea1007>3.0.co;2-r.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. R., Kang, D., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Schoenung, J. M. (2012). Potential environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(2), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302886m.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahernia, S., Amanlou, A., & Amanlou, M. (2015). Determination of hydrogen cyanide concentration in mainstream smoke of tobacco products by polarography. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 13(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-015-0211-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9334-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. (2006). Development betrayed: The end of progress and a co-evolutionary revisioning of the future. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, E. (2007). Talking and taking positions: An encounter between action research and the gendered and racialized discourse of school science. Dissertations in Educational Work. Umea University.

  • O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, L. (2014). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.924942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A., Camillo, J., & Mattos, C. (2014). Quasi-appropriation of dialectical materialism: A critical reading of Marxism in Vygotskian approaches to cultural studies in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9570-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S. V. (2014). Opening the discussion through challenging companion meanings and pedagogical approaches that de-center. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9, 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9422-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., et al. (2014). Toward a posthumanist education. JCT (Online), 30(2), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2009). Taking space personally. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 11–35). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., & Friedman, A. (2014). Quantum mechanics: The theoretical minimum. Philadelphia: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., & Hughes, C. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In Posthuman research practices in education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453082.

  • Teixeira, S., & Krings, A. (2015). Sustainable social work: An environmental justice framework for social work education. Social Work Education, 34, 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1063601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzou, C., Scalone, G., & Bell, P. (2010). The role of environmental narratives and social positioning in how place gets constructed for and by youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903489338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. (1994). Nobody planted it, it just grew! Young adolescents’ perceptions and experiences of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children, Youth and Environments, 11(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. (1996). Ecological feminist philosophies: An overview of the issues. In K. J. Warren (Ed.), Ecological feminist philosophies (pp. ix–xxvi). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakhnoza Kayumova.

Additional information

Lead Editor: J Bazzul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayumova, S., McGuire, C.J. & Cardello, S. From empowerment to response-ability: rethinking socio-spatial, environmental justice, and nature-culture binaries in the context of STEM education. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 14, 205–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9861-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9861-5

Keywords

Navigation