Abstract
Here, we tell the story of Jenna, a high school student who presents her research and poster, “The Effects of Alcohol on Chicks,” at a state science fair. We highlight a conversation that took place as Jenna discussed her research with science educators. The chapter centers on this case narrative and illustrates the importance of critically engaging youth in constructive discussions about human use of animals in research and the controversial nature of ethics pertaining to such practices . It reminds us that scientific advancements are meaningless if we begin to consider these endeavors superior to ethics and morals. The case is followed by a reaction from a science educator who views the story by feminist critique . As Jenna’s case shows, educators are responsible for creating spaces for these types of discussions. We must guide students to reflect and evaluate society’s over-emphasis on the primacy of humans over other animals, and consider how such notions impact the negotiations of what are ethical, human and moral decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E. (2004). Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. Hypatia, 19(1), 1–24.
Animal Welfare Act. (2013a). 7 U.S.C. §§ 2131–2159 (U.S. Government Printing Office).
Animal Welfare Act. (2013b). 9 C.F.R., Part 2. § 2131 et seq (U.S. Government Printing Office).
Animal Welfare Institute. (1969). More cruelty among teenaged science students. Information Report, 18, 2–3.
Arluke, A., & Hafferty, F. (1996). From apprehension to fascination with ‘dog lab’: The use of absolutions by medical students. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25(2), 201–225. doi:10.1177/089124196025002002.
ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. (2014). Welcome to ATLA. Retrieved from http://www.atla.org.uk/about-us/
Balas, A. K. (1998). Science fairs in elementary school. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education (ERIC Document No. ED432444). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432444.pdf
Balcombe, J. (2000). The use of animals in higher education: Problems, alternatives, and recommendations. Washington, DC: The Humane Society Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Bishop, L. J., & Nolen, A. L. (2001). Animals in research and education: Ethical issues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 11(1), 91–112.
Boslaugh, S. (2016). Anthropocentrism. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/topic/anthropocentrism
Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Polity.
Corbett, J. B. (2006). Communicating nature: How we create and understand environmental messages (p. c2006). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Cutraro, J. (2011). Science fair as a family affair. Science News For Kids, p. 3.
Food Security Act of 1985, 17 U.S.C. § 1751 et seq (1985).
Fox, M. W., & Ward, M. A. (1977). Are science fairs fair to animals? Science Teacher, 44(6), 31–33.
Gaard, G. (1993). Living interconnections with animals and nature. Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature, pp 1–12.
Gaskell, G., Einsiedel, E., Hallman, W., Priest, S. H., Jackson, J., & Olsthoorn, J. (2005). Social values and the governance of science. Science, 310(5756), 1908–1909. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/310/5756/1908
Gaukroger, S. (2002). Descartes’ system of natural philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511606229.
Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge (p. c1982). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5706-6.
Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gergen, K. J. (2015). An invitation to social construction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Grafton, T. S. (1980). The challenge and motivation of students through live animal projects. In H. McGiffin & N. Brownley (Eds.), Animals in education: Use of animals in high school biology classes and science fairs (pp. 99–105). Washington, DC: The Institute for the Study of Animal Problems.
Harding, S. (1996). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In E. F. Keller & H. E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 235–248). New York: Oxford University Press.
Health Research Extension Act of 1985, Pub. L. 99—158, “Animals in Research” § 495 et seq (Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, 2015).
Hillaby, J. (1970, January 9). Sanctified torture. New Scientist, p. 69.
Hug, B. (2008). Re-examining the practice of dissection: What does it teach? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 91–105.
Intel International Science and Engineering Fair. (2015–2016). International rules and guidelines 2016. Retrieved from https://member.societyforscience.org/document.doc?id=632
Jacobsen, M. H. (2008). Encountering the everyday: An introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kayumova, S., & Tippins, D. (2016). Toward re-thinking science education in terms of affective practices: reflections from the field. In Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9695-3.
Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lucaj, P., Mueller, M. P., & Tippins, D. J. (2015). A life in relation to the broader stroke of education. In M. P. Mueller & D. J. Tippins (Eds.), Ecojustice, citizen science and youth activism: Situated tensions for science education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–7). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11608-2_1.
Mannheim, K. (1936/1985). Ideology and utopia: Introduction to the sociology of knowledge. New York: Harcourt.
Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon.
Martusewicz, R. A., Edmundson, J., & Lupinacci, J. (2011). Ecojustice education: Toward diverse, democratic, and sustainable communities. New York: Rutledge. doi:10.4324/9781315779492.
Miller-Spiegel, C. (2004). The use of animals in national high school student science fair projects in the United States. ATLA, Alternatives To Laboratory Animals, 32(Suppl 1B), 495–500.
Morrison, A. R. (1993). Biomedical research & the animal rights movement: A contrast in values. American Biology Teacher, 55, 204–208. doi:10.2307/4449633.
National Institutes of Health. (2015). Public health service policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals. [NIH Publication No. 15-8013]. Bethesda: Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
National Research Council. (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NSF, Science & Engineering Indicators. (2014). https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-3/c3s5.htm
Oakley, J. (2009). Under the knife: Animal dissection as a contested school science activity. Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education, 1(2), 59–67.
Orlans, F. B. (1993). In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Prizes for Torture. (1969, May 10). The New York Times.
Rowan, A. N. (1984). Of mice, models, and men: A critical evaluation of animal research. Albany: State University of New York Press, c1984.
Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.
Schwab, J. J., & Brandwein, P. F. (1962). The teaching of science: The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shume, T. (2015). Put away your No. 2 pencils – Reconceptualizing school accountability through EcoJustice. In M. P. Mueller & D. J. Tippins (Eds.), EcoJustice, citizen science and youth activism: Situated tensions for science education (pp. 19–32). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11608-2_3.
Singer, P. (1976). Animal liberation: Toward an end to man’s inhumanity to animals. London: Cape.
Singer, P. (2004). The animal liberation movement (p. c1985). Nottingham: Russell Press.
Society for Science & the Public. (2000–2015). Mission and history. Retrieved from https://www.societyforscience.org/mission-and-history
Society for Science & the Public. (2015). Intel Science Talent Search 2016 rules and entry instruction. Retrieved from https://member.societyforscience.org/document.doc?id=403
Solot, D., & Arluke, A. (1997). Learning the scientist’s role: Animal dissection in middle school. Journal Of Contemporary Ethnography, 26(1), 28–54. doi:10.1177/089124197026001002.
Stanisstreet, M., Spofforth, N., & Williams, T. (1993). Attitudes of undergraduate students to the uses of animals. Studies In Higher Education, 18(2), 177.
Strauss, R. T., & Kinzie, M. B. (1991). Hi-tech alternatives to dissection. American Biology Teacher, 55, 154–157. doi:10.2307/4449249.
Tant, C. (1992). Projects: Making hands-on science easy. A guide to science project management with stress prevention for teachers & parents. Angleton: Biotech Publishing.
Tsuzuki, M., Asada, Y., Akiyama, S., Macer, N., & Macer, D. (1998). Animal experiments and bioethics in high schools in Australia, Japan, and New Zealand. Journal of Biological Education, 32(2), 119–126. doi:10.1080/00219266.1998.9655607.
Wadman, M. (2008). Medical schools swap pigs for plastic. Nature, 453(7192), 140–141. doi:10.1038/453140a.
Weigand, A. (2008). Becoming human: Stories of animals and ethics in biomedicine Temple University.
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeong, S., Tippins, D.J., Kayumova, S. (2017). A Story of Chicks, Science Fairs and the Ethics of Students’ Biomedical Research. In: Mueller, M., Tippins, D., Stewart, A. (eds) Animals and Science Education. Environmental Discourses in Science Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56375-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56375-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56374-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56375-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)