Skip to main content
Log in

Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

Surgical approach is known as a risk factor that influences cup malposition while performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has been conducted comparing cup positioning between the supine direct anterior (DA) and supine direct lateral (DL) THA approaches.

Questions/Purposes

(1) Is there a difference in acetabular cup positioning between supine DA and supine DL THA approaches?

(2) Are there differences in complications based on acetabular cup positioning between the two approaches?

Methods

From 2012 to 2014, 186 patients who underwent primary THAs using DA approach were matched with 186 patients using DL approach by body mass index, age, and gender. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured from standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs by two blinded observers. The Lewinnek safe zone was used as the standard for cup positioning. Cup anteversion, abduction angles, and complications were recorded and compared.

Results

Cup anteversion was on average 3° higher in the DA approach compared to the DL approach. The abduction angle for the DA approach was equivalent to the DL approach both averaging 46° to 47°. There were more DA hips outside of the safe zone (10%) for anteversion than DL (3%) hips. There were no differences in complications between DA and DL approaches.

Conclusion

There is a tendency to antevert the acetabular cup when performing THAs using the DA approach, and one must be mindful of this when implanting the acetabular component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11: 89-99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Krempec JA, Clohisy JC, et al. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2013; 95: 1760-1768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013; 28: 1634-1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005; 87: 762-769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 319-329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, et al. 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1974; 56: 273-284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2000; 82: 315-321.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elson L, Dounchis J, Illgen R, et al. Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int: J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2015.

  9. Jain S, Aderinto J, Bobak P. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79: 135-140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast. 2002; 17: 282-288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998; 13: 530-534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1978; 60: 217-220.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malviya A, Lingard EA, Malik A, et al. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. J Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 387-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 115-124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990:159–170.

  16. Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplast. 2011; 26: 1432-1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, et al. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol, Surg Res: OTSR. 2011; 97: 14-21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplast. 2009; 24: 698-704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 99-103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 753-756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, et al. Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007; 93: 238-246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus group on periprosthetic joint I. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, et al. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003; 85-A: 2310-2317.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rathod PA, Bhalla S, Deshmukh AJ, et al. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1877-1885.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004; 28: 198-201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sendtner E, Schuster T, Worner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop. 2011; 35: 809-815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12: 314-321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takazawa M, Iida S, Suzuki C. Does surgical approach influence the position of acetabular and femoral component in total hip arthroplasty? Comparison between direct anterior and lateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2012; 94-B: 187.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplast. 2006; 21: 503-507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Widmer K-H. Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components? Bioceram Altern Bearings Joint Arthroplasty Ceram Orthop. 2006; 249–252.

  31. Williams S, Leslie I, Isaac G, et al. Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2008; 90(Suppl 3): 111-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, et al. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2007; 89: 526-533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary D. Post MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Chi-Lung Chen, MD; Sara Low, MD; Wei-Ming Lin, MD; and Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu, MBBS, MS, have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Zachary D. Post, MD, reports personal fees from Smith and Nephew, Stryker, DePuy, and OrthoDevelopment, outside the work. Alvin C. Ong, MD, reports personal fees from Stryker and Smith & Nephew, outside the work. Fabio R. Orozco, MD, reports personal fees from Stryker, outside the work. Antonia F. Chen, MD, MBA, reports other support from SLACK publishing, research support from 3M and Myoscience, non-financial support from Joint Purification Systems, and personal fees from ACI, outside the work.

Human/Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was waived from all patients for being included in the study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III

This work was performed at The Rothman Institute.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1225 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 5

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 6

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 7

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 8

(PDF 1225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, A.F., Chen, CL., Low, S. et al. Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. HSS Jrnl 12, 240–244 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9488-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9488-6

Keywords

Navigation