Abstract
Background
Surgical approach is known as a risk factor that influences cup malposition while performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has been conducted comparing cup positioning between the supine direct anterior (DA) and supine direct lateral (DL) THA approaches.
Questions/Purposes
(1) Is there a difference in acetabular cup positioning between supine DA and supine DL THA approaches?
(2) Are there differences in complications based on acetabular cup positioning between the two approaches?
Methods
From 2012 to 2014, 186 patients who underwent primary THAs using DA approach were matched with 186 patients using DL approach by body mass index, age, and gender. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured from standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs by two blinded observers. The Lewinnek safe zone was used as the standard for cup positioning. Cup anteversion, abduction angles, and complications were recorded and compared.
Results
Cup anteversion was on average 3° higher in the DA approach compared to the DL approach. The abduction angle for the DA approach was equivalent to the DL approach both averaging 46° to 47°. There were more DA hips outside of the safe zone (10%) for anteversion than DL (3%) hips. There were no differences in complications between DA and DL approaches.
Conclusion
There is a tendency to antevert the acetabular cup when performing THAs using the DA approach, and one must be mindful of this when implanting the acetabular component.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11: 89-99.
Barrack RL, Krempec JA, Clohisy JC, et al. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2013; 95: 1760-1768.
Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013; 28: 1634-1638.
Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005; 87: 762-769.
Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 319-329.
Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, et al. 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1974; 56: 273-284.
D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2000; 82: 315-321.
Elson L, Dounchis J, Illgen R, et al. Precision of acetabular cup placement in robotic integrated total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int: J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2015.
Jain S, Aderinto J, Bobak P. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79: 135-140.
Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast. 2002; 17: 282-288.
Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplast. 1998; 13: 530-534.
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1978; 60: 217-220.
Malviya A, Lingard EA, Malik A, et al. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. J Arthroplast. 2010; 25: 387-391.
Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 115-124.
McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990:159–170.
Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplast. 2011; 26: 1432-1437.
Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, et al. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol, Surg Res: OTSR. 2011; 97: 14-21.
Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplast. 2009; 24: 698-704.
O’Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 99-103.
Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 753-756.
Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, et al. Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007; 93: 238-246.
Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus group on periprosthetic joint I. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2014; 29: 1331.
Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, et al. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003; 85-A: 2310-2317.
Rathod PA, Bhalla S, Deshmukh AJ, et al. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1877-1885.
Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004; 28: 198-201.
Sendtner E, Schuster T, Worner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop. 2011; 35: 809-815.
Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12: 314-321.
Takazawa M, Iida S, Suzuki C. Does surgical approach influence the position of acetabular and femoral component in total hip arthroplasty? Comparison between direct anterior and lateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2012; 94-B: 187.
Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplast. 2006; 21: 503-507.
Widmer K-H. Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components? Bioceram Altern Bearings Joint Arthroplasty Ceram Orthop. 2006; 249–252.
Williams S, Leslie I, Isaac G, et al. Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2008; 90(Suppl 3): 111-117.
Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, et al. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2007; 89: 526-533.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Chi-Lung Chen, MD; Sara Low, MD; Wei-Ming Lin, MD; and Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu, MBBS, MS, have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Zachary D. Post, MD, reports personal fees from Smith and Nephew, Stryker, DePuy, and OrthoDevelopment, outside the work. Alvin C. Ong, MD, reports personal fees from Stryker and Smith & Nephew, outside the work. Fabio R. Orozco, MD, reports personal fees from Stryker, outside the work. Antonia F. Chen, MD, MBA, reports other support from SLACK publishing, research support from 3M and Myoscience, non-financial support from Joint Purification Systems, and personal fees from ACI, outside the work.
Human/Animal Rights
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was waived from all patients for being included in the study.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
Additional information
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III
This work was performed at The Rothman Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, A.F., Chen, CL., Low, S. et al. Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. HSS Jrnl 12, 240–244 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9488-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9488-6