Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this work was to present a methodology to assess the energy consumption, specifically the energy utilized in the washing and drying processes, of textile products in their use-phase with the help of statistical tools. Regardless of the environmental impacts associated with the use-phase of textile products, analysis of energy consumption in that phase is still lacking. There is a need to design methodology for identifying the hotspots and parameters influencing the energy consumption in the use-phase of textile products. A pragmatic method that consists of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework plus principle component analysis (PCA), extended by Procrustes analysis (PA), is used to determine the energy consumption and minimize the possible uncertainties in the use-phase of textile product systems.
Methods
The LCA plus PCA-PA method employed in this work to analyze the energy consumption of textile products in the use-phase comprises two statistical tools. First, PCA was applied to find the key parameters affecting the results. As an extension of PCA, PA was performed to highlight the most prominent variables within the dataset and extract the maximum amount of information. Lastly, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was utilized for the classification of textile products on the basis of energy consumption variables and the similarity of their results.
Results and discussion
Among various energy consuming parameters in the use-phase of a textile product, both geographical and physical aspects can be prominent variables that significantly can affect the results of the energy consumption. After the LCA plus PCA-PA methodology, country of the use-phase in the geographical aspect and in the physical aspect, the fiber type and weight of the products were the influential variables. Hotspots or influential parameters being identified, a number of steps can be taken that can play an important role in decreasing environmental impacts by reducing the energy consumption in the laundering process of textile products during the use-phase.
Conclusions
The methodology of LCA plus PCA-PA for energy consumption in textile products was employed to study the gap in currently available assessments. Using this method, the main influencing energy consuming parameters or hotspots in the use-phase of a textile product system could easily be identified and potential improvements of sustainability can be proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian C (2010) Mistra future fashion-review of life cycle assessments of clothing. 21 October, 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.oakdenehollins.co.uk/media/232/2010_mistra_review_of_life_cycle_assessments_of_clothing.pdf
AISE (2013) The case for the “A.I.S.E Low Temperature Washing” initiative: substantiation Dossier June 2013 AISE, Brussels (2013)
Arild AH, Brusdal R, Halvorsen GJ, Terpstra PMJ, Van K, IAC (2003) An investigation of domestic laundry in Europe-habits, hygiene and technical performance. National Institute for Consumer Research, Oslo
Baxter MJ, Jackson CM (2001) Variable selection in artifact compositional studies. Archaeometry 43(2):253–268
Berry J (2002) The effect of income on appliances in U.S. households. official energy statistics from the U.S. government. Energy Information Administration, USA
Beton A et al (2012) Environmental improvement potential of textiles (IMPRO‐Textiles). JRC, Draft, 2012. Retrieved from; http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/textiles/docs/120423%20IMPRO%20Textiles_Publication%20draft%20v1.pdf
Blackburn RS and Textile Institute (Manchester, England) (2009) Sustainable textiles: life cycle and environmental impact. Woodhead, Cambridge
BSR (2009) Apparel industry life cycle carbon mapping. Business for social responsibility. Retrieved from; https://www.bsr.org/…/BSR_Apparel_Supply_Chain_Carbon_Report.pdf
BUWAL (2000) Oekobilanzen – Heizenergie aus Heizoe, Erdgas oder Holz, Schriftenreihe Umwelt no. 315, Bern, 2000
Carre A (2008) Life cycle assessment comparing laundered surgical gowns with polypropylene based disposable gowns. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Melbourne
Cartwright J et al (2011) Assessing the environmental impacts of industrial laundering: life cycle assessment of polyester/cotton shirts. M.Sc. thesis, Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California
Chen HL, Burns LD (2006) Environmental analysis of textile products. Cloth Text Res J 24:248
Cherrett N, Barrett J, Clemett A, Chadwick M, Chadwick MJ (2005) Ecological footprint and water analysis of cotton, hemp and polyester. Stockholm Environment Institute report prepared for and reviewed by BioRegional Development Group and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF Cymru), Stockholm, Sweden
Ciroth A et al (2002) Geographical and technological differences in life cycle inventories shown by the use of process models for waste incinerators. Part I. Technological and geographical differences. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):295–300
Collins M, Aumônier S (2002) Streamlined life cycle assessment of two Marks & Spencer plc apparel products. Environmental Resources Management, 2002, Oxford
Cotton Incorporated, PE International (2012) The life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of cotton fiber and fabric-full report. Cotton Foundation, America
Curran MA (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practice. In: 2006, EPA/600/R-06/060. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati
De Saxcé M, Perwuelz A, Boufateh I, Pesnel S (2010) Scénarios pour la diminution de l’impact environnemental des textiles dans leur phase d’utilisation. Materiaux 2010, 18-22 Octobre 2010 Nantes, France
De Saxcé M, Rabenasolo B and Perwuelz A (2014) Assessment and improvement of the appropriateness of an LCI data set on a system level – application to textile manufacturing. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):950–961
Defra (2006) Recycling of low grade clothing waste. waste strategy project WRT152. Retrieved from; http://www.oakdenehollins.co.uk/pdf/defr01_058_low_grade_clothing-public_v2.pdf
Ecoinvent (2010) Ecoinvent data v2.2. Ecoinvent reports No.1-25. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf
Eriksson L, Umetrics AB (2006) Multi- and megavariate data analysis. Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden
Faberi S (2007) Domestic washing machines and dishwashers. Preparatory studies for Ecodesign requirements of EuP
Fisher T et al (2008) Public understanding of sustainable clothing: a report to the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; Defra, London. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=EV0405_7666_FRP.pdf
Fletcher K (2008) Sustainable fashion and textiles: design journeys Kate Fletcher., Earthscan Publications
Franklin Associates Ltd. (1993) Life cycle analysis (LCA): woman’s knit polyester blouse. Prepared for American Fibre Manufacturers Association. Retrieved from http://www.fibersource.com/f-tutor/LCA-Page.htm
Frischknecht R, Heijungs R, Hofstetter P (1998) Einstein’s lessons for energy accounting in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:266–272
Frischknecht R et al (2015) Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(7):957–969
Procter and Gamble (1999) Global variations in automatic washing. S.l.: Proctor and Gamble, Single summary slide
Georgakellos A (2005) Evaluation of life cycle inventory results using critical volume aggregation and polygon-based interpretation. J Clean Prod 13:567–582
Gordenker A (2010) Japan Times. Laundry Logic. [Online] September 16, 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2010/09/16/reference/laundry-logic/
Granello S et al (2015) Consumer behaviour on washing, a Mistra Future Fasion project 4 report
Guinée B (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect
Gutierrez E, Lozano S, Moreira M, Feijoo G (2010) Assessing relationships among life-cycle environmental impacts with dimension reduction techniques. J Environ Manag 91(4):1002–1011
Hasanbeigi A, Price L (2012) A review of energy use and energy efficiency technologies for the textile industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(6):3648–3665
Hermann G, Kroeze C, Jawjit W (2007) Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators. J Clean Prod 15(18):1787–1796
Ison E, Miller A (2000) The use of LCA to introduce life-cycle thinking into decision-making for the purchase of medical devices in the NHS. J Env Ass Pol Manag 2(4):453–476
Jackson J (1991) A user guide to principal components. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Julia KS, Damien F, Olivier J, Suren E (2009) A spatially explicit life cycle inventory of the global textile chain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:443–455
Kalliala EM, Nousiainen P (1999) Life cycle assessment environmental profile of cotton and polyester-cotton fabrics. AUTEX Res J 1(1):8–20
Kim J, Changsang Y, Yaewon P, Chung HP (2015) Post-consumer energy consumption of textile products during ‘use’ phase of the lifecycle. Fibers Polym 16(4):926–933
Krzanowski WJ (1987) Selection of variables to preserve multivariate data structure, using principal components. Appl Statist 36(1):22–33
Krzanowski WJ (1996) A stopping rule for structure-preserving variable selection. Stat Compt 6(1):51–56
Laitala K (2014) Clothing consumption an interdisciplinary approach to design for environmental improvement. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Laitala K, Boks C, Klepp IG (2011) Potential for environmental improvements in laundering. Int J Consum Stud 35(2):254–264
Lefèvre C (2009) Ecodesign of laundry dryers. Preparatory studies for Ecodesign requirements Final Report March 2009, France: Price Waterhouse Coopers Advisory
Levi Strauss & Co. (2009) A product lifecycle approach to sustainability. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from: http://www.levistrauss.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/A-Product-Lifecyle-Approach-to-Sustainability.pdf
Li T, Zhang H, Yuan C, Liu Z, Fan C (2012) A PCA-based method for construction of composite sustainability indicators. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(5):593–603
Madsen J, Hartlin B, Perumalpillai S, Selby S, Aumônier S (2007) Mapping of evidence on sustainable development impacts that occur in life cycles of clothing: a report to DEFRA. Environmental Resources Management Ltd, London
Mark et al (2010) Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production. Environ Sci Technol (44):2189–2196
Millet D, Bistagnino L, Lanzavecchia C, Camous R, Poldma T (2007) Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? J Clean Prod 15:335–346
Mouron P, Nemecek T, Scholz R, Weber O (2006) Management influence on environmental impacts in an apple production system on Swiss fruit farms: combining life cycle assessment with statistical risk assessment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:311–322
Muthu SS (2015) Handbook of sustainable apparel production. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Nielsen R, Schmidt A (2014) Changing consumer behaviour towards increased prevention of textile waste. FORCE Technology, 2014. doi:10.6027/NA2014-927 NA2014:927 ISSN 2311-0562
Nordic Council of Ministers (2007) Impact of energy labelling on household appliances. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
Pakula C, Stamminger R (2010) Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide. Energy Efficiency 3:365–382
Park YS, Egilmez G, Kucukvar M (2015) A novel life cycle-based principal component analysis framework for eco-efficiency analysis: case of the U.S. manufacturing and transportation nexus. J Clean Prod 92(4):327–342
PE International (2012) GaBi 6 software and databases. Leinfelden Echterdingen, Germany
Perwuelz A, Duhamel F (2010) Utilisation de l’ACV dans l’industrie textile : le projet ACVTex Congrès Ecotechnologies, June 2010, Lille grand Palais
Pieragostini C, Mussati MC, Aguirre P (2012) On process optimization considering LCA methodology. J Environ Manage 96:43–54
Pizzol M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Thomsen M (2011) Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). J Clean Prod 19(6-7):646–656
Ponder CS (2009) Life cycle inventory analysis of medical textiles and their role in prevention of nosocomial infections. Doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University. Raleigh, North Carolina
Ponder CS (2010) Cradle-to-use life cycle inventory of medical gowns. Sustainable textiles and medical protections conference UC Davis. Retrieved from http://nsf-muses.ucdavis.edu/pdf/STAMPconference/CPonder%20Gown%20Comparison%20v2.pdf
Richard B, John P (2004) Life cycle analysis of cotton towels: impact of domestic laundering and recommendations for extending periods between washing. Green Chem 6:G59–G61
Roos S, Gustav S, Bahareh Z, Greg P (2015) Environmental assessment of Swedish fashion consumption. Five garments—sustainable futures
Shove E (2003) Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality. Berg, Oxford
Smith GG, Barker RH (1995) Life cycle analysis of a polyester garment. Resour Conserv Recycl 14:233–249
Sohail Y, Perwuelz A, Nemeshwaree B (2014) A case study of life cycle inventory of cotton curtain. Proceedings of Autex 2014
Søren L et al (2007) EDIPTEX—Environmental assessment of textiles. Working Report No. 24 2007
Sotirios B, Dimitrios G (2013) A probabilistic framework for the evaluation of products’ environmental performance using life cycle approach and principal component analysis. J Clean Prod 42:103–115
Swart P, Alvarenga RAF, Dewulf J (2014) Abiotic resource use. In: Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ (ed) Encyclopedia of LCA, Vol. IV: Life cycle impact assessment. Springer
Tenney MW, Carberry JB (1981) Detergency-theory and test methods: detergents and our environment. Cutler WG, Davis RC (eds) Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, pp 900–940
Van der Velden et al (2014) LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. Int J Life Cycle Assess (19):331–356
Vattenfall (2015) Tvätt och Tork. Available at: http://www.vattenfall.se/sv/tvatt-ochtork.htm
Vinson LJ (1981) Detergency-theory and test methods: detergents and our environment. Cutler WG, Davis RC (eds) Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, pp 679–704
Vizcarra KEL, Lio PH (1994) A life-cycle inventory of baby diapers subject to Canadian conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 13(10):1707–1716
Vyas S, Kumaranayake L (2006) Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan 21(6):459–468
Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping for evaluating clustering methods. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244
Yilmaz IH, Akcaoz, Ozkan B (2005) An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renew Energ (30):145–155
Zhang Y, Xin L, Rufeng X, Zengwei Y (2015) Life cycle assessment of cotton t-shirts in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:994–1004
Acknowledgments
This work was part of the framework of project SMDTex, financed by the European Commission under Erasmus Mundus. The first author acknowledge Anne Perwuelz (ENSAIT, France), Jinping Guan and Guoqiang Chen (Soochow University, China) for project collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Adisa Azapagic
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yasin, S., Behary, N., Rovero, G. et al. Statistical analysis of use-phase energy consumption of textile products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 1776–1788 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1129-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1129-2