Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of cotton T-shirts in China

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays, environmental sustainability of textile has gained much attention from government and suppliers due to the resource consumption and pollutant emissions. Besides, different consumer behaviors can result in quite different environmental consequences mainly in terms of water and energy consumption. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically evaluate the environmental impacts of textiles from a life cycle perspective to improve the sustainability of textiles especially for China, the biggest producer, exporter, and consumer in the world.

Methods

This study is conducted according to the International Organizations for Standardization’s (ISO) 14040 standard series. The declared unit is a piece of 100 % cotton short-sleeved T-shirt. The production data mainly come from field investigations of representative mills in China. The use-phase data are mainly from 924 questionnaires of Chinese residents. The secondary data from databases, literatures, and authoritative statistical data are supplemented in case primary data are not available. The potential environmental impacts are evaluated using the CML2001 and USEtox methodologies built into the GaBi version 6.0 software. We determine hotspots throughout the life cycle of the cotton textile considering the impact categories of abiotic depletion, acidification potential, global warming potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, eutrophication potential, water use, and toxicity.

Results and discussion

The results of the study show that cotton cultivation, dyeing, making-up, and use-phases are the main contributors to the environmental impacts. In particular, fertilizer, pesticide, and water use in cotton cultivation, coal, dyes, and auxiliaries use in dyeing, electricity use in making-up, detergent and water use in washing, and electricity use in spinning are the hotspots based on the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results. The use-phase scenario analysis shows that compared with machine washing, electric drying, and ironing share the majority of electricity consumption. Compared with Americans, Chinese washing habits are much more environmental-friendly and bring much lower environmental impacts in the use stage.

Conclusions

Energy consumption, chemical use, and water use are main contributors to most impact categories, which help us to find hotspots and potential improvements of sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackburn RS, Payne JD (2004) Life cycle analysis of cotton towels: impact of domestic laundering and recommendations for extending periods between washing. Green Chem 6:G59–G61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YF, Jiang Y, Chen WM, Qin CX (2008) The research of the distribution of nitrogen content in the Chinese coal. Clean Coal Technol 71–74 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • China National Textile and Apparel Council (2012) The outline of building a strong textile industry in China. China Textile and Apparel Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chyxx Consulting (2013) Forecast of the development of Chinese yarn-dyed fabrics in 2013. http://www.chyxx.com/industry/201307/214733.html. Accessed 27 July 2014

  • CML (2001) Handbook on impact categories “CML2001”. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton Council International (2012) Cotton USA-global supply chain. http://www.cottonusa.org.cn/ljmm/mhxx/skjg/201204/P020120424574724582428.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2014

  • Cotton Incorporated, PE International (2012) The life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of cotton fiber and fabric-full report. Cotton Foundation, America

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai J, Dong H (2014) Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crop Res 155:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Saxce M, Pesnel S, Perwuelz A (2012) LCA of bed sheets—some relevant parameters for lifetime assessment. J Clean Prod 37:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrant L, Olsen SI, Wangel A (2010) Environmental benefits from reusing clothes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:726–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanbeigi A, Price L (2012) A review of energy use and energy efficiency technologies for the textile industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:3648–3665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong CC, Liu MC, Li WH (2015) Evaluation on the policies of non-point pollution control of chemical fertilizer in China. J Arid Land Resour Environ 29:1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006) ISO 14040 Series: environmental life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin SQ, Du M, Wei X, Sun Y (2011) Environmental impact assessment of cotton planting and suggestions for its sustainable development. J Agric Sci Technol 13:110–117 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran-Ciliz N (2003) Reduction in resource consumption by process modifications in cotton wet processes. J Clean Prod 11:481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostka G, Moslener U, Andreas J (2013) Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China. J Clean Prod 57:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen SE, Hansen J, Knudsen HH, Wenzel H, Larsen HF, Kristensen FM (2007) EDIPTEX—environmental assessment of textiles. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik DS, Bharti PK (2010) Textile pollution. Daya Publishing House, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2012) Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Textile Industry http://www.miit.gov.cn/n11293472/n11293832/n11293907/n11368223/14439904.html. Accessed 19 January 2014

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2013) China statistical yearbook 2012. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu WY (2013) China’s New-Urbanization Report 2012. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakula C, Stamminger R (2010) Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide. Energy Effic 3:365–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PE International (2012) GaBi 6 software and databases. Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponder CS (2009) Life cycle inventory analysis of medical textiles and their role in prevention of nosocomial infections. University, North Carolina State

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK et al (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger JK, Friot D, Jolliet O, Erkman S (2009) A spatially explicit life cycle inventory of the global textile chain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:443–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Yuan ZW, Jiang WL, Bi J (2010) Order scheduling optimization for printing and dyeing enterprises aiming water conservation. Syst Eng Theory Pract 30:1514–1520 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang LS, Li Y, Zhang JH (2010) Partial rootzone irrigation increases water use efficiency, maintains yield and enhances economic profit of cotton in arid area. Agric Water Manag 97:1527–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terinte N, Manda BMK, Taylor J, Schuster KC, Patel MK (2014) Environmental assessment of coloured fabrics and opportunities for value creation: spin-dyeing versus conventional dyeing of modal fabrics. J Clean Prod 72:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting C (2011) Building a sustainable supply chain: an analysis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in the Chinese textile and apparel industry. J Text Inst 102:837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velden NM, Patel MK, Vogtländer JG (2014) LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:331–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walser T, Demou E, Lang DJ, Hellweg S (2011) Prospective environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver T-shirts. Environ Sci Technol 45:4570–4578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B, Hischier R (2006) Ecoinvent data v2. 2. St. Gallen, Switzerland

  • Woolridge AC, Ward GD, Phillips PS, Collins M, Gandy S (2006) Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: an UK energy saving perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 46:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization (2013) Time series on international trade. http://stat.wto.org/StatisticalProgram/WsdbExport.aspx?Language=E. Accessed 23 January 2015

  • Wu GH (2012) Calculation and analysis of fossil energy consumption carbon emissions —taking Jinan as an example. Theory J:61–65 (in Chinese)

  • Yang HQ, Cui WG (2010) Cotton industry in China, status and development strategies. Crops:13–17 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Yuan ZW, Zhu YN, Shi JK, Liu X, Huang L (2012) Life-cycle assessment of continuous pad-dyeing technology for cotton fabrics. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:659–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XT, Hong TH, Lei OY (1997) Mathematical model of water conservation of the washing machine. Math Practice Theory 27:71–75 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Sustainability Consortium and the Natural Science Foundation of China (41222012). All the listed authors have confirmed the final version of the manuscript and approved it for submission.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that there is no any potential conflict of financial or non-financial interest and this research does not involve any animals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    You Zhang, Xin Liu, Rufeng Xiao & Zengwei Yuan

Authors
  1. You Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rufeng Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zengwei Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zengwei Yuan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zuoren Nie

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xiao, R. et al. Life cycle assessment of cotton T-shirts in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 994–1004 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0889-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0889-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation