Abstract
The purpose of this research is to propose a rating model that measures the post-consumer energy consumption, specifically during the washing, drying, and ironing processes of textile products. Prior to designing the rating model, the methodology of sustainability assessment is overviewed, with discussions on textile sector’s efforts in developing the sustainability index as an assessment tool for textile products or their manufacturers. Despite the significant environmental impacts made by the ‘maintenance’ or ‘use’ phase of the textile lifecycle, the assessment of ‘use’ phase is not thoroughly evaluated. In this study, a rating model was built to measure or estimate the amount of energy use during the product maintenance. The maintenance during ‘use’ phase, defined as washing, drying and ironing processes, is categorized for its maintenance options; washer type, wash temperature, dryer type, filling load, and ironing. The selection of maintenance options generates the score for the impact on energy use. Scenario analysis for different maintenance conditions with different textile products presents the applicability of the proposed rating model as a simple yet effective measurement tool.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. H. Brundtland, “Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development”, pp.41–43, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), “G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosure”, pp.7–14, Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam, 2013.
B. J. Brown, M. E. Hanson, D. M. Liverman, and R. W. Meredith, Environ. Manage., 11, 713 (1987).
J. M. Allwood, S. E. Laursen, C. M. de Rodriguez, and N. M. Bocken, “Well Dressed? The Present and Future Sustainability of Clothing and Textiles in the United Kingdom”, pp.8–14, University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge, 2006.
M. Herva, A. Franco, S. Ferreiro, A. Alvarez, and E. Roca, J. Hazard. Mater., 156, 478 (2008).
H. L. Chen and L. D. Burns, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 24, 248 (2006).
S. S. Muthu, Y. Li, J. Y. Hu, and P. Y. Mok, Ecol. Indic., 13, 66 (2012).
R. W. Kates, W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Bolin, N. M. Dickson, S. Faucheux, G. C. Gallopin, A. Grubler, B. Huntley, J. Jager, N. S. Jodha, R. E. Kasperson, A. Mabogunje, P. Matson, H. Mooney, B. Moore III, T. O’Riordan, and U. Svedin, Science, 292, 641 (2001).
S&P Dow Jones Indices and RobecoSAM, “Dow Jones Sustainability World Index Guide: Version 12.2”, pp.32–35, RobecoSAM AG, Zurich, 2013.
Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI), “Annual Review 2013”, Retrieved October 17, 2013, http://www.sustainabilityindices.com/images/review-presentation-2013.pdf
Interbrand, “Best Global Green Brands 2013”, Retrieved September 23, 2013, from http://www.interbrand.com/en/best-global-brands/Best-Global-Green-Brands/2013/Best-Global-Green-Brands-2013.aspx
CR Magazine, “CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2013”, Retrieved October 17, 2013, from http://www.thecro.com/files/100Best2013_web.pdf
Newsweek. “Green Rankings”, Retrieved September 23, 2013, from http://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-greenrankings-2012-full-methodology-65325.
International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14040: 2006, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, 2006.
International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14044: 2006, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines, 2006.
R. K. Singh, H. R. Murty, S. K. Gupta, and A. K. Dikshit, Ecol. Indic., 9, 189 (2009).
W. Klöpffer, Int. J. Life. Cycle. Ass., 13, 89 (2008).
S. Valdivia, C. M. L. Ugaya, G. Sonnemann, J. Hildenbrand, A. Ciroth, M. Finkbeiner, W. Klöpffer, B. Mazjin, S. Prakash, and M. Traverso, “Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making Informed Choices on Products”, pp.1–22, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Intiative, Paris, 2011.
T. Swarr, D. Hunkeler, W. Klöpffer, H. L. Pesonen, A. Ciroth, A. C. Brent, and R. Pagan, Int. J. Life. Cycle. Ass. 13, 89 (2011).
E. S. Andrews, L. P. Barthel, T. Beck, C. Benoit, A. Ciroth, C. Cucuzzella, C. O. Gensch, J. Hebert, P. Lesage, A. Manhart, and P. Mazeau, “Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products”, pp.37–41, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), 2009.
S. Radhakrishnan in “Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing” (S. S. Muthu Ed.), pp.23–57, Springer, Singapore, 2015.
K. T. Fletcher, J. Text. Inst., 89, 72 (1998).
K. Laitala, C. Boks, and I. G. Klepp, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 35, 254 (2011).
B. Josephy, E. Bush, J. Nipkow, and S. Attali, “Proc. the 6th International Conference EEDAL’11”, pp.770–782, Luxembourg, 2013.
M. W. Tenney and J. B. Carberry in “Detergency-theory and Test Methods: Detergents and Our Environment” (W. G. Cutler and R. C. Davis Eds.), pp.900–940, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, 1981.
L. J. Vinson in “Detergency-theory and Test Methods: Detergents and Our Environment” (W. G. Cutler and R. C. Davis Eds.), pp.679–704, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, 1981.
Y. Yamaguchi, E. Seii, M. Itagaki, and M. Nagayama, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 35, 243 (2011).
C. H. Park, O. K. Lee, E. Y. Kim, and S. R. Kim, Jpn. Res. Assn. Text. End-Uses., 43, 60 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Yun, C., Park, Y. et al. Post-consumer energy consumption of textile products during ‘use’ phase of the lifecycle. Fibers Polym 16, 926–933 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-0926-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-0926-8