Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of energy and GHG emissions during ethanol production from grass straws using various pretreatment processes

  • LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to perform a well-to-pump life cycle assessment (LCA) to investigate the overall net energy balance and environmental impact of bioethanol production using Tall Fescue grass straw as feedstock. The energy requirements and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were compared to those of gasoline to explore the potential of bioethanol as sustainable fuel.

Methods

The functional unit used in the study was 10,000 MJ of energy. The data for grass seed production were collected from the farmers in Oregon and published reports. The compositions of straw, pretreatment, and hydrolysis yields were obtained from laboratory experiments. Process models were developed for ethanol production using different pretreatment technologies in SuperPro Designer to calculate the process energy, raw materials, utility use, and emissions related. The Greenhouse Gases Regulated Emissions and Energy use in Transportation model and other literature studies were used to obtain additional data. Systematic boundary identification was performed using relative mass, energy, and economic value method using a 5% cutoff value.

Results and discussion

Ethanol yields from grass straw were estimated 256.62, 255.8, 255.3, and 230.2 L/dry metric ton of biomass using dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water, and steam explosion pretreatments, respectively. Fossil energy required to produce one functional unit was in the range of −1507 to 3940 MJ for different ethanol production techniques. GHG emissions from ethanol LCA models were in the range of −131 to −555.4 kg CO2 eq. per 10,000 MJ of ethanol. Fossil energy use and GHG emissions during ethanol production were found to be lowest for steam explosion pretreatment among all pretreatment processes evaluated. Change in coproduct allocation from economic to mass basis during agricultural production resulted in 62.4% and 133.1% increase in fossil energy use and GHG emissions respectively.

Conclusions

Technologies used for ethanol production process had major impact on total fossil energy use and GHG emissions. N2O emissions from the nitrogen fertilizers were major contributor (77%) of total GHG emissions produced during agricultural activities. There was 57.43–112.67% reduction in fossil energy use to produce 10,000 MJ of ethanol compared to gasoline; however, about 0.35 ha of land is also required to produce this energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace J, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J (2002) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado

  • Bai Y, Luo L, van der Voet E (2010) Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-derived ethanol as transport fuel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(5):468–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Cabañas A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M (2006) Ethanol production from steam-explosion pretreated wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotech 130(1–3):496–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banowetz GM, Boateng A, Steiner JJ, Griffith SM, Sethi V, El-Nashaar H (2008) Assessment of straw biomass feedstock resources in the Pacific Northwest. Biomass Bioenergy 32(7):629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barta Z, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010) Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossel U (2003) Well-to-wheel studies, heating values, and the energy conservation principle. European Fuel Cell Forum, Oberrohrdorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchison C, Davis G (2009) Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. Technical paper TP-090403-A, Ecometrica Press, London, UK

  • Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):557–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Keshwani D, Chen C (2007) Potential of agricultural residues and hay for bioethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142(3):276–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • da Costa SL, Chundawat SPS, Balan V, Dale BE (2009) Cradle-to-grave assessment of existing lignocellulose pretreatment technologies. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20(3):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale BE (2007) Thinking clearly about biofuels: ending the irrelevant ‘net energy’debate and developing better performance metrics for alternative fuels. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1(1):14–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggeman T, Elander RT (2005) Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Biores Technol 96(18):2019–2025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graf A, Koehler T (2002) Oregon cellulose–ethanol study. Oregon Office of Energy, Salem

    Google Scholar 

  • GREET (2010) The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model. Argonne National Laboratory, US Department of Energy. http://greet.es.anl.gov/main. Version 1.8d. Accessed January 10, 2011

  • Hamelinck CN, Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC (2005) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 28(4):384–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Wen Z (2008) Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment. Biochem Eng J 38(3):369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazi FK, Fortman JA, Anex RP, Hsu DD, Aden A, Dutta A, Kothandaraman G (2010) Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover. Fuel 89:S20–S28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2002) Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain I. system expansion. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2005) Environmental aspects of ethanol derived from no-tilled corn grain: nonrenewable energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 28(5):475–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE, Jenkins R (2009) Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):160–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Murthy G (2011a) Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics, energy and water use in cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Murthy G (2011b) Pretreatments and enzymatic hydrolysis of grass straws for ethanol production in the Pacific Northwest US. Biol Eng 3(2):97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(8):3713–3729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laser M, Jin H, Jayawardhana K, Lynd LR (2009) Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 3(2):195–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2007) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated barley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration. Enzyme Microb Technol 40(5):1100–1107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd TA, Wyman CE (2005) Combined sugar yields for dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Biores Technol 96(18):1967–1977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Van der Voet E, Huppes G (2009a) An energy analysis of ethanol from cellulosic feedstock—corn stover. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(8):2003–2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, van der Voet E, Huppes G, Udo de Haes HA (2009b) Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(6):529–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean HL, Spatari S (2009) The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol. Environ Res Lett 4:014001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani S, Sokhansanj S, Tagore S, Turhollow A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant-Part 2: Cost of heat and power generation systems. Biomass Bioenerg 34(3):356–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR (2005a) Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Biores Technol 96(18):1986–1993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee Y, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005b) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol 96(6):673–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):301–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Agricultural Enterprise Budgets (2010) http://arec.oregonstate.edu/oaeb/. Accessed April 10, 2011

  • Prasad SB (1995) Biomass-fired steam power cogeneration system: a theoretical study. Energ Convers Manage 36(1):65–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds M, Fraser R, Checkel D (2000) The relative mass-energy-economic (RMEE) method for system boundary selection Part 1: A means to systematically and quantitatively select LCA boundaries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander K, Murthy GS (2010) Life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(7):704–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmer M, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(2):464–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JH (2008) System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):350–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan J, Aden A, Paustian K, Killian K, Brenner J, Walsh M, Nelson R (2003) Energy and environmental aspects of using corn stover for fuel ethanol. J Ind Ecol 7(34):117–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Tagore S, Turhollow A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant. Part 1: cost of feedstock supply logistics. Biomass Bioenerg 34(1):75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spatari S, Bagley DM, MacLean HL (2010) Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Biores Technol 101(2):654–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spatari S, Zhang Y, MacLean HL (2005) Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-and corn stover-derived ethanol-fueled automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9750–9758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner J, Griffith S, Mueller-Warrant G, Whittaker G, Banowetz G, Elliott L (2006) Conservation practices in western Oregon perennial grass seed systems. I. Impacts of direct seeding and maximal residue management on production. Agron J 98:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Biores Technol 83(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Cheng JJ (2005) Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production. Biores Technol 96(14):1599–1606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2007) Enzymatic-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. Bio Resources 2(4):707–738

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teymouri F, Laureano-Pérez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE (2004) Ammonia fiber explosion treatment of corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115(1):951–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2005) Updated energy and greenhouse gas emission results of fuel ethanol. In: The 15th Int Symp Alcohol Fuels, San Diego, CA, SUA

  • White JG (2000) Oregon perspectives on cellulose-to-ethanol. Oregon Office of Energy. http://www.nrbp.org/papers/029.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2011

  • Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M (2006) Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Prog 22(4):1012–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman C (1996) Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. Taylor & Francis, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee Y (2005) Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Biores Technol 96(18):2026–2032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J (2011) Alkaline pretreatment of switchgrass for ethanol production. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by Western Sun Grant Regional Centre, US Department of Transportation and Oregon Built Environment and Sustainable Technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, 116 Gilmore Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    Deepak Kumar & Ganti S. Murthy

Authors
  1. Deepak Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ganti S. Murthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganti S. Murthy.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Shabbir Gheewala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, D., Murthy, G.S. Life cycle assessment of energy and GHG emissions during ethanol production from grass straws using various pretreatment processes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17, 388–401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0376-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0376-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation