Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States

  • LCA FOR AGRICULTURE • CASE STUDY
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

The goal of this study is to estimate the county-level environmental performance for continuous corn cultivation of corn grain and corn stover grown under the current tillage practices for various corn-growing locations in the US Corn Belt. The environmental performance of corn grain varies with its farming location because of climate, soil properties, cropping management, etc. Corn stover, all of the above ground parts of the corn plant except the grain, would be used as a feedstock for cellulosic ethanol.

Materials and methods

Two cropping systems are under investigation: corn produced for grain only without collecting corn stover (referred to as CRN) and corn produced for grain and stover harvest (referred to as CSR). The functional unit in this study is defined as dry biomass, and the reference flow is 1 kg of dry biomass. The system boundary includes processes from cradle to farm gate. The default allocation procedure between corn grain and stover in the CSR system is the system expansion approach. County-level soil organic carbon dynamics, nitrate losses due to leaching, and nitrogen oxide and nitrous oxide emissions are simulated by the DAYCENT model. Life cycle environmental impact categories considered in this study are total fossil energy use, climate change (referred to as greenhouse gas emissions), acidification, and eutrophication. Sensitivities on farming practices and allocation are included.

Results

Simulations from the DAYCENT model predict that removing corn stover from soil could decrease nitrogen-related emissions from soil (i.e., N2O, NO x , and NO3 − leaching). DAYCENT also predicts a reduction in the annual accumulation rates of soil organic carbon (SOC) with corn stover removal. Corn stover has a better environmental performance than corn grain according to all life cycle environmental impacts considered. This is due to lower consumption of agrochemicals and fuel used in the field operations and lower nitrogen-related emissions from the soil.

Discussion

The primary source of total fossil energy associated with biomass production is nitrogen fertilizer, accounting for over 30% of the total fossil energy. Nitrogen-related emissions from soil (i.e., N2O, NO x , and NO3 − leaching) are the primary contributors to all other life cycle environmental impacts considered in this study.

Conclusions

The environmental performance of corn grain and corn stover varies with the farming location due to crop management, soil properties, and climate conditions. Several general trends were identified from this study. Corn stover has a lower impact than corn grain in terms of total fossil energy, greenhouse gas emissions, acidification, and eutrophication. Harvesting corn stover reduces nitrogen-related emissions from the soil (i.e., N2O, NO x , NO3 −). The accumulation rate of soil organic carbon is reduced when corn stover is removed, and in some cases, the soil organic carbon level decreases. Harvesting only the cob portion of the stover would reduce the negative impact of stover removal on soil organic carbon sequestration rate while still bringing the benefit of lower nitrogen-related emissions from the soil. No-tillage practices offer higher accumulation rates of soil organic carbon, lower fuel consumption, and lower nitrogen emissions from the soil than the current or conventional tillage practices. Planting winter cover crops could be a way to reduce nitrogen losses from soil and to increase soil organic carbon levels.

Recommendations and perspectives

County-level modeling is more accurate in estimating the local environmental burdens associated with biomass production than national- or regional-level modeling. When possible, site-specific experimental information on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics should be obtained to reflect the system more accurately. The allocation approach between corn grain and stover significantly affects the environmental performance of each. The preferred allocation method is the system expansion approach where incremental fuel usage, additional nutrients in the subsequent growing season, and changes in soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics due to removing corn stover are assigned to only the collected corn stover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andraski TW, Bundy LG (2005) Crop effects on corn yield response to nitrogen on an irrigated sandy. Soil Agron J 97:1239–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LA (2002) Soil, nutrient, and water management systems used in U.S. corn production. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 774.US Department of Agriculture

  • Conservation Technology Information Center (2003) National Crop Residue Management Survey. Available at http://www.conservationinformation.org/?action=members_crm. Accessed April 2008

  • Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ, Mosier AR, Ojima DS, Kulmala AE, Phongpan S (2000) General model for N2O and N2 gas emissions from soils due to denitrification. Global Biogeochem Cycle 14:1045–1060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ, Mosier AR, Hartman MD, Brenner J, Ojima DS, Schimel DS (2001) Simulated interaction of carbon dynamics and nitrogen trace gas fluxes using the DAYCENT model. In: Shaffer MJ, Ma L, Hansen S (eds) Modeling carbon and nitrogen dynamics for soil management. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 303–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecobilan (2007) DEAMTM LCA database. France

  • Economic Research Service (ERS) (2005) Commodity Costs and Returns. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/testpick.htm. Accessed April 2008

  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2008) Tools for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). Available at http://www.epa.gov/ordntrnt/ORD/NRMRL/pubs/600r02052/600r02052.htm. Accessed April 2008

  • EFMA (European Fertilizer Manufacturers’ Association) (2000a) Production of nitric acid. Available at http://www.efma.org/publications/BAT%202000/Bat02/Index.asp. Accessed April 2008

  • EFMA (European Fertilizer Manufacturers’ Association) (2000b) Production of ammonium nitrate and calcium ammonium nitrate. Available at http://www.efma.org/Publications/BAT%202000/Bat06/index.asp. Accessed April 2008

  • EFMA (European Fertilizer Manufacturers’ Association) (2000c) Production of urea and urea ammonium nitrate. Available at http://www.efma.org/publications/BAT%202000/Bat05/Index.asp. Accessed April 2008

  • Farm Fan Inc. (2007) Available at http://www.fficorp.com/english/farmfans.html. Accessed April 2008

  • Gerhartz W (1996) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. VCH, Weinheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner D, Hettenhaus J, Schechinger T (1999) Corn stover potential: recasting the corn sweetener industry. In: Janick J (ed) Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS, Alexandria, VA, pp 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby DA, Battaglin WA, Aulenbach BT, Hooper RP (2001) Nitrogen input to the Gulf of Mexico. J Environ Qual 30:329–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graboski MS (2002) Fossil energy use in the manufacture of corn ethanol. Prepared for the National Corn Grower Association

  • Graham RL, Nelson R, Sheehan J, Perlack RD, Wright LL (2007) Current and potential U.S. corn stover supplies. Agron J 99:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB (ed) (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer, The Netherlands

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: working group I: the scientific basis. Available at http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm. Accessed April 2008

  • ISO 14041 (1998) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis

  • Jimenez-Gonzalez C, Kim S, Overcash M (2000) Methodology for developing gate-to-gate life cycle inventory information. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar TC, Parkin TB, Jaynes DB, Cambardella CA, Meek DW, Jung YS (2006) Examining changes in soil organic carbon with oat and rye cover crops using terrain covariates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1168–1177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2002) Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain: I. System expansion. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2004) Cumulative energy and global warming impact associated with producing biomass for biobased industrial product. J Ind Ecol 7(3–4):147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2005a) Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass & Bioenergy 29:426–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2005b) Life cycle assessment study of biopolymers (Polyhydroxyalkanoates) derived from no-tilled corn. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:200–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2005c) Life cycle inventory information of the United States electricity system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:294–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Overcash M (2000) Allocation procedure in multi-output process—an illustration of ISO 14041. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristen L, Manies KL, Harden JW, Kramer L, Parton W (2000) Parameterizing Century to model cultivated and noncultivated sites in the loess region of western Iowa. U.S. Geological Survey Report 00-508; U.S. Department of the Interior. Available at http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of00-508/. Accessed April 2008

  • Kuo S, Sainju UM, Jellum EJ (1997) Winter cover crop effects on soil organic carbon and carbohydrate in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:145–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus W (2000) Minnesota farm machinery economic cost estimates for 2000. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota

  • Mann L, Tolbert V, Cushman J (2002) Potential environmental effects of corn (Zea mays L.) stover removal with emphasis on soil organic matter and erosion. Agr Ecosyst Environ 89(3):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisinger JJ, Randall GW (1991) Estimating nitrogen budgets from soil-crop systems. In: Follett RF, Keeney DR, Cruse RM (eds) Managing nitrogen for groundwater quality and farm profitability. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 85–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Miguez FE, Bollero GA (2006) Winter cover crops in Illinois: evaluation of ecophysiological characteristics of corn. Crop Sci 46:536–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASS (2007) National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov. Accessed April 2008

  • National Climatic Data Center (2007) National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. Available at http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/stationlocator.html. Accessed April 2008

  • Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory (2005) Century soil organic matter model: user’s guide and reference, Colorado State University. Available at http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/century5/reference/index.htm. Accessed April 2008

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (2007) Energy Estimator. US Department of Agriculture. Available at http://ecat.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed April 2008

  • Nelson RG (2002) Resource assessment and removal analysis for corn stover and wheat straw in the Eastern and Midwestern United States—rainfall and wind erosion methodology. Biomass Bioenerg 22:349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSSC—National Soil Survey Center, Soil Survey Laboratory (2005) Soil characterization database. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available at http://ssldata.nrcs.usda.gov/querypage.asp?chksa=1&ac=244&as=3951#sitevar/. Accessed April 2008

  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (2006) Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a joint research agenda, DOE/SC-0095, US Department of Energy. Available at http://genomicsgtl.energy.gov/biofuels/b2bworkshop.shtml. Accessed April 2008

  • Office of Industrial Technologies (2000) Chapter 5 agricultural chemicals: fertilizers, energy and environmental profile of the U.S. chemical industry. In Energy and environmental profile of the U.S. chemical industry. US Department of Energy. Available at http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/chemicals/pdfs/profile_chap5.pdf. Accessed April 2008

  • Pagani G, Zardi U (1994) Process and plant for the production of urea. United States Patent 5,276,183

  • Potting J, Schöpp W, Blok K, Hauschild M (1998) Site-dependent life-cycle impact assessment of acidification. J Ind Ecol 2(2):63–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reicosky DC, Forcella F (1998) Cover crop and soil quality interactions in agroecosystems. J Soil Water Conserv 53:224–229

    Google Scholar 

  • RFA (2007) Renewable Fuels Association. Available at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/. Accessed February 2007

  • Saini M, Price AJ, van Santen E (2006) Cover crop residue effects on early-season weed establishment in a conservation-tillage corn–cotton rotation. Southern Conservation Systems Conference, Amarillo TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber JD (1999) Nutrient leaching from corn residues under simulated rainfall. J Environ Qual 28:1864–1870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapouri H, Duffield JA, Wang M (2002) The energy balance of corn ethanol: an update. Agricultural Economic Report 813, US Department of Agriculture

  • Sheehan J, Aden A, Riley C, Paustian K, Brenner J, Lightle D, Nelson R, Walsh M, Cushman J (2002) Is ethanol from corn stover sustainable? Adventures in cyber-farming: a life cycle assessment of the production of ethanol from corn stover for use in a flex fuel vehicle. Draft report for peer review, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, USA

  • Snapp SS, Swinton SM, Labarta R, Mutch D, Black JR, Leep R, Nyiraneza J, O’Neil K (2005) Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs and performance within cropping system niches. Agr J 97:322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Vink ETH, Rábago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR (2003) Applications of life cycle assessment to NaturalWorkTM polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stabil 80(3):403–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2000) Greet 1.5—transportation fuel-cycle model. Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson SA, Ramstad PE (1987) Corn: chemistry and technology, 1st edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M (2006a) Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Prog 22:1012–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M, Wang M, Huo H (2006b) Fuel-cycle assessment of selected bioethanol production pathways in the United States. ANL/ESD/06-7. Argonne National Laboratory. Available at http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/377.pdf. Accessed April 2008

  • Zhao SL, Gupta SC, Huggins DR, Moncrief JF (2001) Tillage and nutrient source effects on surface and subsurface water quality at corn planting. J Environ Qual 30:998–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the US Department of Energy and input from the external ICBR LCA Advisory Panel. The authors also thank the reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, 3900 Collins Road, Lansing, MI, 48910-8396, USA

    Seungdo Kim & Bruce E. Dale

  2. DuPont Engineering Research and Technology, 1007 Market Street, Wilmington, DE, 19898, USA

    Robin Jenkins

Authors
  1. Seungdo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce E. Dale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robin Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seungdo Kim.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gérard Gaillard

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S., Dale, B.E. & Jenkins, R. Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14, 160–174 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0054-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0054-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation