Abstract
China, being the world’s largest exporter, has now certain environmental commitments such as to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. These commitments of China has raised a reasonable concern regarding the expected reduction in the production and export of pollution intensive goods in the future. Besides China, the most efficient countries in the region to produce these goods are most of the member countries from ASEAN. The current study therefore aims to analyze if in the future, China reduces the production and export of these goods, whether the selected ASEAN countries can be the next choice for the export of pollution intensive goods. Based on the data availability for the period 1990–2019, this study considers five selected ASEAN countries (ASEAN-5). The results are based on the Auto Regressive Distributive Lag (ARDL) bound testing approach to cointegration and Error Correction Modeling (ECM). The aggregate analysis of five pollution intensive goods (pulp and paper (341), industrial chemicals (351), non-metallic minerals products (369), iron and steel (371) and non-ferrous metals (372)) suggests that Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow can significantly increase the export of pollution intensive goods only in case of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. However, there is no significant effect of FDI on the export of pollution intensive goods in case of Philippines and Singapore. The disaggregate analyses of the five pollution intensive goods suggest that in each of the ASEAN-5 countries, FDI inflow can significantly increase the export of pollution intensive goods in some of these industries rather than in all of them. In nutshell, it is concluded that ASEAN-5 countries can be a potential choice for the export of pollution intensive goods in some of the pollution intensive industries but not in all of them.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Mani and Wheeler (1998) have pointed several pollution intensive goods on the basis of relatively higher pollution abetment cost for these goods. These goods are: pulp and paper (341), industrial chemicals (351), non-metallic minerals products (369), iron and steel (371) and non-ferrous metals (372).
China’s major export destinations in 2019 are USA, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea Rep, Vietnam, Germany, India, Netherlands, UK, Singapore, Russia.
Singapore has minimum restrictiveness (0.013 score of FDI regulatory index) on FDI inflow, even in some of the pollution- intensive industries.
Economic Community of West African States
ASEAN has ten member countries: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam
ARDL approach to cointegration is suitable for a data series where some variables are stationary at level I(0) and the others are stationary at first difference I(1). But no variable should be stationary at second difference I(2).
The speed of convergence in each model can be calculated as (ECt−1)*100. For example, the speed of convergence for the model with product code 341 in Indonesia is 0.40*100 = 40.
References
Abdulrahman BMA (2021) Analysis of export determinants in Sudan by using auto regressive distributed lag model (ARDL). Acad J Interdisc Stud 10(4):96–96
Asghari M (2013) Does FDI promote MENA region's environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. Intl J Sci Res Environ Sci 1:92–100
Baek J (2015) A new look at the FDI—income—energy—environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy 91:22–27
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Iqbal J, Salam M (2016) Short run and long run effects of exchange rate volatility on commodity trade between Pakistan and Japan. Econ Anal Policy 52:131–142
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos JM (2019) An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):23010–23026
Bao Q, Chen Y, Song L (2011) Foreign direct investment and environmental pollution in China: a simultaneous equations estimation. Environ Dev Econ 16(1):71–92
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283
Bulut U, Ucler G, Inglesi-Lotz R (2021) Does the pollution haven hypothesis prevail in Turkey? Empirical evidence from nonlinear smooth transition models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:38563–38572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13476-7
Chishti MZ, Ullah S, Ozturk I et al (2020) Examining the asymmetric effects of globalization and tourism on pollution emissions in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09057-9
Chishti MZ, Sinha A (2022) Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS economies. Technol Soc 68:101828
Chishti MZ, Rehman A, Murshed M (2021d) An estimation of the macroeconomic determinants of income poverty in Pakistan? Evidence from a non-linear ARDL approach. J Public Aff e2719
Chishti MZ, Hussain B (2021) Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus between tourism and balance of payments deficit: an updated evidence from Pakistan. Iran Econ Rev
Chishti MZ, Ahmad M, Rehman A, Khan MK (2021a) Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon emissions in BRICS economies. J Clean Prod 292:126035
Chishti MZ, Iqbal J, Mahmood F, Azeem HSM (2020b) The implication of the oscillations in exchange rate for the commodity-wise trade flows between Pakistan and China: an evidence from ARDL approach. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 23(04):2050030
Chishti MZ (2021) Assessing the dynamic effects of oscillations in the exchange rate on commodity-wise trade flows between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: evidence from ARDL approach. Iran Econ Rev
Chishti MZ (2020) Analysis of the nexus between demographic changes and economic growth in Pakistan: role of capital stock. Iran Econ Rev
Chishti M, Hussain B, Jehangir F (2021c) Do foreign direct investment and trade openness influence poverty in Pakistan? Evidence from NARDL Approach. Iran Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2021.81556
Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2019) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy (December)
Mani M, Wheeler D (1998) In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. J Environ Dev7(3):215–247
Marques AC, Caetano R (2020) The impact of foreign direct investment on emission reduction targets: evidence from high- and middle-income countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 55:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.08.005
Meidan M (2020) Unpacking China's 2060 carbon neutrality pledge
Polloni-Silva E, Ferraz D, Camioto FDC, Rebelatto DADN, Moralles HF (2021) Environmental Kuznets curve and the pollution-halo/haven hypotheses: an investigation in Brazilian municipalities. Sustainability 13:4114
Nawaz SMN, Alvi S, Akmal T (2021) The impasse of energy consumption coupling with pollution haven hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve: a case study of South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14164-2
Oo T, Kueh J, Hla DT (2019) Determinants of export performance in ASEAN region: panel data analysis. Int Bus Res 12(8):1–14
Opoku EEO, Adams S, Aluko OA (2021) The foreign direct investment-environment nexus: does emission disaggregation matter? Energy Rep 7:778–787
Osano HM, Koine PW (2016) Role of foreign direct investment on technology transfer and economic growth in Kenya: a case of the energy sector. J Innov Entrep 5(1):1–25
Plumer B (2018) You’ve heard of outsourced jobs, but outsourced pollution? It’s real, and tough to tally up. New York Times. 9(04)
Shofwan S and Fong, M (2001) Foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis in Indonesia. J Law Govern 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15209/jbsge.v6i2.202
Singhania M and Saini N (2021) Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: role of FDI. J Bus Res 123:516–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.007
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(25):24845–24859
Thanh Cong HA (2021) Hoang Nam NGUYEN The role of institution on FDI and environmental pollution nexus: evidence from developing countries. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 8(6):0609–0620
Ullah S, Chishti MZ, Majeed MT (2020) The asymmetric effects of oil price changes on environmental pollution: evidence from the top ten carbon emitters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:29623–29635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09264-4
Weimin Z and Chishti M (2021) Toward sustainable development: assessing the effects of commercial policies on consumption and production-based carbon emissions in developing economies. SAGE Open 11(4):21582440211061580
Weimin Z, Chishti MZ, Rehman A, Ahmad M (2021) A pathway toward future sustainability: assessing the influence of innovation shocks on CO2 emissions in developing economies. Environ Dev Sustain 1–24
Xu X, Wang Q, Hu H, Wang X (2021) Air pollution control: an analysis of China’s industrial off-peak production policy through the quasi-natural experiment method. Sustainability 13(9):4808
Data availability
The data for the study can be obtained from corresponding author upon request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS conceptualized, conducted the econometric analysis and wrote the original draft. MZC conceptualized, conducted the econometric analysis, wrote the literature review and reviewed the draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
‘Not applicable’
Consent to participate
‘Not applicable’
Consent for publication
‘Not applicable’
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salam, M., Chishti, M.Z. Will ASEAN countries be a potential choice for the export of pollution intensive goods?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 81308–81320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21427-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21427-z