Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the nexus between export diversification and environmental pollution: evidence from BRICS nations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, industrial growth has enabled the BRICS nations to increase their export earnings from both traditional and new products. However, in terms of modernization of industries, these nations can be considered as laggards, because the present production processes appear to be carbon-intensive and energy-inefficient. In this backdrop, the present study, by using the second-generation econometric procedures, is intended to examine the impact of industrialization, export diversification, technological innovation, income inequality, and resource rents on the carbon dioxide emissions in the BRICS nations from 1990 to 2018. The long-run coefficients revealed that the industrial expansion, reduction in export diversification, low concentration on traditional exports, and high concentration on new exports exacerbated the air quality in the BRICS nations. On the other hand, technological advancement contributed to restoring environmental quality during the study period. Furthermore, it is observed that the present research endeavors in the BRICS nations are insufficient in circumventing industrial pollution, as the value of the joint coefficient of technological advancement and industrialization is found insignificant but negative. Hence, based on the computed results, a multipronged policy framework is proposed, so that these nations can achieve the targeted sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the coming years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We have prepared the data set, and can be submitted as and when it is required.

References

  • Adom P, Kwakwa P, Amankwaa A (2018) The long-run effects of economic, demographic, and political indices on actual and potential CO2 emissions. J Environ Manag 218:516–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Mahalik M, Shahbaz M (2016) Dynamics between economic growth, labor, capital and natural resource abundance in Iran: an application of the combined cointegration approach. Res Policy 49:213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M (2021) Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Indic 121:107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alola A, Bekum F, Sarkodie S (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alshubiri F, Elheddad M (2020) Foreign finance, economic growth and CO2 emissions Nexus in OECD countries. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manage 12(2):161–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Altinoz B, Dogan E (2021) How renewable energy consumption and natural resource abundance impact environmental degradation? New findings and policy implications from quantile approach. Energy Sources Part B 16:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2021.1885527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand R, Kochha K, Mishra S (2015) Make in India: which exports can drive the next wave of growth? IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/119, International Monetary Fund, Asia and Pacific Department. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15119.pdf

  • Aydin M, Turan Y (2020) The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:43233–43245

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekun F, Alola A, Sarkodie S (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch T, Pagan A (1980) The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Xian Q, Zhou J, Li D (2020) Impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in G20 countries. J Environ Manag 271:110987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu CC, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc 65:101587

  • Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran M, Hashem Raissi M (2013) Debt, inflation and growth: robust estimation of long-run effects in dynamic panel data models. Globalization Institute Working Papers 162, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Available at: https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/institute/wpapers/2013/0162.pdf

  • Dauda L, Long X, Mensah C, Salman M, Boamah K, Ampon-Wireko S et al (2021) Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. J Clean Prod 281:125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio M (2015) Industrial Policy in the BRICS. In: Naudé W, Szirmai A, Haraguchi N (eds) Structural change and industrial development in the BRICS. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725077.003.0016

  • Dialoke C (2017) Refocusing science and technology education in Nigeria: implication for the achievement of sustainable development goals by 2030. Cap J Educ Stud 5(1):141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, Isik C (2020) The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ 723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063

  • Doytch N (2020) The impact of foreign direct investment on the ecological footprints of nations. Environ Sustain Indic 8:100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertugrul H, Cetin M, Seker F, Dogan E (2016) The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol Indic 67:543–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Export Import Bank of India (2014) Research & development in BRICS: an insight. Occasional Paper No. 168, Mumbai, https://www.brics-ibcm.org/images/publications/Research_and_Development_in_BRICS-An_Insight.pdf.

  • Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q (2016) Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China's provincial panel data. Ecol Indic 67:533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasanov F, Liddle B, Mikayilov J (2018) The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: territory vs consumption emissions accounting. Energy Econ 74:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Hdom H, Fuinhas J (2020) Energy production and trade openness: assessing economic growth, CO2 emissions and the applicability of the cointegration analysis. Energ Strat Rev 30:100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Duan H (2020) Estimating the threshold interactions between income inequality and carbon emissions. J Environ Manag 263:110393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain M, Dogan E (2021) The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. J Clean Prod 304:304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2020) World energy outlook 2020. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020

  • Imaz M, Sheinbaum C (2017) Science and technology in the framework of the sustainable development goals. World Journal of Science, Technologyand Sustainable Development 14(1):2–17

  • IMF (2019) Export diversification index. Retrieved from International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/total_theil@SPRLU/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD

  • IRENA (2018) Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, available at: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Apr/IRENA_Report_GET_2018.pd.

  • Jordaan S, Romo-Rabago E, McLeary R, Reidy L, Nazari J, Herremans I (2017) The role of energy technology innovation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of Canada. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:1397–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson A, Schor J, Huang X (2017) Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a State-level Analysis, 1997–2012. Ecol Econ 134:4048

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A, Duman Y (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke J, Zheng N, Fridley D, Price L, Zhou N (2012) Potential energy savings and CO2 emissions reduction of China's cement industry. Energy Policy 45:739–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedir A (2017) Environment and climate change in Africa in an era of sustainable development goals. In: From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Routledge, pp 152–166

  • Khan Z, Malik M, Latif K, Jiao Z (2020) Heterogeneous effect of eco-innovation and human capital on renewable & non-renewable energy consumption: disaggregate analysis for G-7 countries. Energy 209:118405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazăr D, Minea A, Purcel A-A (2019) Pollution and economic growth: evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Econ 81:1121–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (2019) Economics of technological leapfrogging. Working Paper No. 17/2019, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Policy, Research and Statistics, Vienna. Available at: https://www.unido.org/api/opentext/documents/download/16414872/unido-file-16414872#:~:text=The%20second%20group%20of%20economies,reshoring%20back%20to%20home%20countries.&text=We%20divide%20the%20firms%20in,and%20'start%2Dups'

  • Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra A, Sharma C, Véganzonès-Varoudakis M-A (2014) Trade liberalization, technology transfer, and firms’ productive performance: the case of Indian manufacturing. J Asian Econ 33:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutascu M, Sokic A (2020) Trade openness - CO2 emissions nexus: a wavelet evidence from EU. Environ Model Assess 25:411–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassani A, Awan U, Zaman K, Hyder S, Aldakhil A, Abro M (2019) Management of natural resources and material pricing: global evidence. Res Policy 64:101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri M, Gohari M, Majid M (2015) A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:843–862

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran M (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics,University of Cambridge. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp1240.pdf

  • Reckien D, Creutzig F, Fernandez B, Lwasa S, Tovar-Restrepo M, Mcevoy D, Satterthwaite D (2017) Climate change, equity and the sustainable development goals: an urban perspective. Environ Urban 29(1):159–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Ma H, Ozturk I (2021) Do industrialization, energy importations, and economic progress influence carbon emission in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13916-4

  • Ridzuan S (2019) Inequality and the environmental Kuznets curve. J Clean Prod 228:1472–1481

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijesh R (2020) Trade liberalisation, technology import, and Indian manufacturing exports. Glob Econ Rev 49(4):369–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Salman M, Long X, Dauda L, Mensah C, Muhammad S (2019) Different impacts of export and import on carbon emissions across 7 ASEAN countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Sci Total Environ 686:1019–1029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago F (2020) The role of industrial policies in the BRICS economic integration process. Working Paper 1/2020, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Policy, Research and Statistics, Vienna. Available at: https://www.unido.org/api/opentext/documents/download/16531301/unido-file-16531301

  • Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Sumayya (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schino A (2019) Environmental impact of steel industry. In: Chaudhery M (ed) Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73645-7_101

  • Shahbaz M, Gozgor G, Hammoudeh S (2019) Human capital and export diversification as new determinants of energy demand in the United States. Energy Econ 78:335–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sharma R, Sinha A, Jiao Z (2021) Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy 148, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421520306765:111965

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad U, Doğan B, Sinha A, Fareed Z (2021) Does Export product diversification help to reduce energy demand: Exploring the contextual evidences from the newly industrialized countries. Energy 214:214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma C (2018) Exporting, access of foreign technology, and firms’ performance: searching the link in Indian manufacturing. Q Rev Econ Finance 68:46–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Kautish P (2020) Examining the nonlinear impact of coal and oil-based electricity production on CO2 emissions in India. Electr J 33(6):106775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2020.106775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Kautish P, Uddin M (2020) Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Manag Environ Qual 31(1):89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2020a) Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:36970–36982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09659-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Sinha A, Kautish P (2021) Does financial development reinforce environmental footprints? Evidence from emerging Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:9067–9083

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheinbaum-Pardo C, Mora-Pérez S, Robles-Morales G (2012) Decomposition of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Mexican manufacturing industries: trends between 1990 and 2008. Energy Sustain Dev 16(1):57–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shyamal P, Rabindra B (2004) Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: a note on conflicting results. Energy Econ 26(6):977–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Bhattacharya J (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve estimation for NO2 emission: a case of Indian cities. Ecol Indic 67:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Bhattacharya J (2017) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for SO2 emission: a case of Indian cities. Ecol Indic 72:881–894

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Sen S (2016) Atmospheric consequences of trade and human development: a case of BRIC countries. Atmos Pollut Res 7(6):980–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Sengupta T, Saha T (2020a) Technology policy and environmental quality at crossroads: designing SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 161:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shah M, Sengupta T, Jiao Z (2020b) Analyzing technology-emissions association in Top-10 polluted MENA countries: how to ascertain sustainable development by quantile modeling approach. J Environ Manag 267:110602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Samuel C, Amissah K, Clifford J, Farhad T-H, Mensah I (2020) Non-linear nexus between CO2 emissions and economic growth: a comparison of OECD and B&R countries. Energy 212:118637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Sarkis J, Geng Y, Bleischwitz R, Qian Y, Xu L, Wu R (2020) Examining the role of BRICS countries at the global economic and environmental resources nexus. J Environ Manag 262:110330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2019) The impact of rapid technological change on sustainable development. Report No. UNCTAD/DTL/STICT/2019/10, United Nations, Geneva.Availabe at: https://unctad.org/webflyer/impact-rapid-technological-change-sustainable-development

  • UNIDO (2019) Industrial development report 2020- industrializing in the digital age. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-11/UNIDO_IDR2020-MainReport_overview.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2018) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2018-En.pdf.

  • Usman O, Alola A, Sarkodie S (2020) Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: evidence from the US. Renew Energy 150:266–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Vona F, Patriarca F (2011) Income inequality and the development of environmental technologies. Ecol Econ 70:2201–2213

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolde-Rufael Y, Idowu S (2017) Income distribution and CO2 emission: a comparative analysis for China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74:1336–1345

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2021) World Development Indicators. Retrieved January 24, 2019, from The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator

  • World Social Report (2020) Inequality in a rapidly changing world. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at:https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/02/World-Social-Report2020-FullReport.pdf

  • Zafar A, Ullah S, Majeed M, Yasmeen R (2020) Environmental pollution in Asian economies: does the industrialisation matter? OPEC Energy Rev 44(3):227–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Saeed A, Zaidi S, Waheed A (2021a) The linkages among natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality: a path toward sustainable development. Sustain Dev 29(2):353–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Sinha A, Ahmed Z, Qin Q, Zaidi SAH (2021b) Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 142:110868

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi S, Zafar M, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanello G, Fu X, Mohnen P, Ventresca M (2016) The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: a systematic literature review. J Econ Surv 30(5):884–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongping W, Changliang S, Qiang L, Gang W (2011) Impact of heavy industrialization on the carbon emissions: an empirical study of China. Energy Procedia 5:2610–2616

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The corresponding author, i.e., Dr. Rajesh Sharma, has written the paper. The whole idea, novelty, and technical part are handled by Dr. Avik Sinha. Lastly, Dr. Pradeep Kautish provided support in terms of editing, proofreading, and drafting.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

While preparing the manuscript, to the best of our knowledge, we have followed the required ethical procedures.

Consent to participate

We have consent of all authors and respective institutions to communicate the manuscript for consideration in the Journal.

Consent for publication

We confirm that if the paper is accepted, it could be published in this prestigious journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, R., Sinha, A. & Kautish, P. Examining the nexus between export diversification and environmental pollution: evidence from BRICS nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 61732–61747 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14889-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14889-0

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation