Abstract
China’s GDP grew 9% annually during the end of the twentieth century. This economic growth degrades China’s ecology, making it the world’s greatest polluter. This position forced China to invest in developing nations and to take advantage of low-cost labor and increased pollution quotas from the World Trade Organization (WTO) to meet sustainable development objectives without environmental harm. The significance of this study is, first, this study examines the influence of Chinese outward foreign direct investment, gross domestic product, trade openness, technological innovation, and energy consumption on carbon emissions in Asian countries (Turkey, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, India, Indonesia, and Cambodia). Secondly, the panel autoregressive distributed lag cointegration (ARDL) technique was used on data from 2000 to 2020 to investigate the pollution halo/haven hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for south Asian nations. This analysis demonstrated that Chinese outbound foreign direct investment increases carbon emissions and confirms the pollution halo concept. Except for India and Pakistan, these nations show a U-shaped link between Chinese foreign direct investment and carbon emissions. So, policy implications recommended by the results of this study are foreign direct investment inflows with modern and ecofriendly technological transfer and enhancement in labor, and conservational management practices will benefit emerging countries to attain their sustainable development goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sources and relevant links are provided in the paper to access data.
References
Abbas SZ, Kousar A, Razzaq S, Saeed A, Alam M, Mahmood A (2018) Energy management in South Asia. Energy Strategy Rev 21:25–34
Abbass K, Niazi AAK, Basit A, Qazi TF, Song H, Begum H (2021) Uncovering effects of hot potatoes in banking system: arresting die-hard issues. SAGE Open 11(4):21582440211061554
Abbass K, Niazi AA, Qazi TF, Basit A, Song H (2021a). The aftermath of COVID-19 pandemic period: barriers in implementation of social distancing at workplace. Library Hi Tech
Abbass K, Begum H, Alam AF, Awang AH, Abdelsalam MK, Egdair IMM, Wahid R (2022) Fresh insight through a Keynesian theory approach to investigate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan. Sustainability 14(3):1054
Abbass K, Song H, Khan F, Begum H, Asif M (2022a) Fresh insight through the VAR approach to investigate the effects of fiscal policy on environmental pollution in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(16):23001–23014
Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I (2022b). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-21
Abbass K, Basit A, Niazi AA, Mufti R, Zahid N, Qazi TF. (2022c). Evaluating the social outcomes of COVID-19 pandemic: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-13
Abbass K, Sharif A, Song H, Ali MT, Khan F, Amin N (2022d) Do geopolitical oil price risk, global macroeconomic fundamentals relate Islamic and conventional stock market? Empirical evidence from QARDL approach. Res Policy 77:102730
Abbass K, Asif M, Niazi AAK, Qazi TF, Basit A, Al-Muwaffaq Ahmed FA (2022e) Understanding the interaction among enablers of quality enhancement of higher business education in Pakistan. PLoS One 17(5):e0267919
Ahmad M, Jabeen G, Wu Y (2021) Heterogeneity of pollution haven/halo hypothesis and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across development levels of Chinese provinces. J Clean Prod 285:124898
Ahmad US, Usman M, Hussain S, Jahanger A, Abrar M (2022) Determinants of renewable energy sources in Pakistan: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18502-w
Al Mamun M, Sohag K, Uddin G, Ahmed A (2017) Sectoral output, energy use, and CO emission in middle-income countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(10):9754–9764
Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70:466–479
Ali U, Syed JH, Malik RN, Katsoyiannis A, Li J, Zhang G, Jones KC (2014) Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in South Asian region: a review. Sci Total Environ 476:705–717
Ali QM, Nisar QA, Qammar R, Abbass K (2022). Greening the workforce in higher educational institutions: the pursuance of environmental performance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-14
Amjad A, Abbass K, Hussain Y, Khan F, Sadiq S (2022). Effects of the green supply chain management practices on firm performance and sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-18
An T, Xu C, Liao X (2021). The impact of FDI on environmental pollution in China: evidence from spatial panel data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-13
Ang JB (2008) Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. J Pol Mode 30(2):271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.04.010
Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy 38(1):650–655
Aryal JP, Sapkota TB, Khurana R, Khatri-Chhetri A (2020) Climate change mitigation options among farmers in South Asia. Environ Dev Sustain 22(4):3267–3289
Asia I-S (2009) Energy and carbon emissions profiles of 54 south Asian cities. British High Commission, New Delhi
Atif A, Abugamos H (2017) Income-carbon emissions nexus for Middle East and North Africa countries: a semi-parametric approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(2):152–159
Baek J (2016) A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy 91:22–27
Baek J, Koo WW (2009) A dynamic approach to the FDI-environment nexus: the case of China and India. East Asian Economic Review 3(2):87–106. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3077770
Bakhsh K, Rose S, Ali MF, Ahmad N, Shahbaz M (2017) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: new evidences from 3SLS. J Environ Manag 196:627–632
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Ibáñez-Luzón L, Usman M, Shahbaz M (2022) The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renew Energy 185:1441–1455
Baum CF (2003) A review of Stata 8.1 and its time series capabilities. Working Papers. Economics 23. http://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/581.html
Begum H, Abbas K, Alam AF, Song H, Chowdhury MT, Ghani AB (2022) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment and socioeconomic viability: a sustainable production chain alternative. foresight. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-02-2021-0053
BP. (2021). BP Global statistics. from https://www.bp.com/
Bulus GC, Koc S (2021) The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(28):38238–38253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13462-z
Cagno E, Ramirez-Portilla A, Trianni A (2015) Linking energy efficiency and innovation practices: Empirical evidence from the foundry sector. Energy Policy 83:240–256
Cai W-G, Zhou X-L (2014) On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 79:239–248
Carraro C, & Siniscalco D (1994). Voluntary agreements in enviromental policy; a theoretical appraisal: Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei.
Chandran V, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:445–453
Chang C-C (2010) A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 87(11):3533–3537
Coondoo D, Dinda S (2002) Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecol Econ 40(3):351–367
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109(3):755–787
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217
Fodha M, Zaghdoud O (2010) Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 38(2):1150–1156
Fu Y, Supriyadi A, Wang T (2018) China’s outward FDI in Indonesia: Spatial patterns and determinants. Sustainability 10(12):4632
Fu W, Abbass K, Niazi AA, Zhang H, Basit A, Qazi TF (2022). Assessment of sustainable green financial environment: the underlying structure of monetary seismic aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-15
Gammeltoft P, Tarmidi LT (2013) Chinese foreign direct investment in Indonesia: trends, drivers and impacts. Int J Technol Learn Innov Dev 6(1-2):136–160
Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: J Econ Soc 37:424–438
Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Practitioners corner: tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 58(3):555–560
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement: National Bureau of economic research Cambridge. Mass, Cambridge
Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(10):9579–9592
Harris R, Sollis R (2003) Applied time series modelling and forecasting. Wiley, Hoboken
Hodson EL, Brown M, Cohen S, Showalter S, Wise M, Wood F et al (2018) US energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO2 policy: results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study. Energy Econ 73:352–370
Hou Y, Wang Q (2021) A bibliometric study about energy, environment, and climate change. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(26):34187–34199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14059-2
Huang Y, Chen X, Zhu H, Huang C, Tian Z (2019) The heterogeneous effects of FDI and foreign trade on CO2 emissions: evidence from China. Math Probl Eng 2019:12671367
Huang Y, Haseeb M, Usman M, Ozturk I (2022) Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and ecological footprint: Is there any difference between E-7 (developing) and G-7 (developed) countries? Technol Soc 68:101853
Hussain Y, Abbass K, Usman M, Rehan M, Asif M. (2022). Exploring the mediating role of environmental strategy, green innovations, and transformational leadership: the impact of corporate social responsibility on environmental performance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-17.
Im E-S, Pal JS, Eltahir EA (2017) Deadly heat waves projected in the densely populated agricultural regions of South Asia. Sci Adv 3(8):e1603322
Intisar RA, Yaseen MR, Kousar R, Usman M, Makhdum MSA (2020) Impact of trade openness and human capital on economic growth: a comparative investigation of Asian countries. Sustainability 12(7):2930
Ioannides YM, Overman HG, Rossi-Hansberg E, Schmidheiny K (2008) The effect of information and communication technologies on urban structure. Econ Policy 23(54):202–242
IPCC. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change, from http://www.ipcc.ch/.
Irfan M, Shaw K (2017) Modeling the effects of energy consumption and urbanization on environmental pollution in South Asian countries: a nonparametric panel approach. Qual Quant 51(1):65–78
Jahanger A, Usman M, Ahmad P (2021) A step towards sustainable path: the effect of globalization on China’s carbon productivity from panel threshold approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(6):8353–8368
Jahanger A, Usman M, Balsalobre‐Lorente D (2022a). Linking institutional quality to environmental sustainability. Sustain Dev
Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022b) The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Res Policy 76:102569
Jahanger A. Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022c) Linking institutional quality to environmental sustainability. Sustain Develop 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.234516JAHANGERETAL
Jiang C, Ma X (2019) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: a global perspective. Sustainability 11(19):5241
Kamal M, Usman M, Jahanger A, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2021) Revisiting the role of fiscal policy, financial development, and foreign direct investment in reducing environmental pollution during globalization mode: evidence from linear and nonlinear panel data approaches. Energies 14(21):6968
Ke J, Jahanger A, Yang B, Usman M, Ren F (2022) Digitalization, financial development, trade, and carbon emissions; implication of pollution haven hypothesis during globalization mode. Front Environ Sci 211:211
Khalid K, Usman M, Mehdi MA (2021) The determinants of environmental quality in the SAARC region: a spatial heterogeneous panel data approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(6):6422–6436
Khalid S, Hashmi HBA, Abbass K, Ahmad B, Niazi AAK, Achim MV (2022) Unlocking the effect of supervisor incivility on work withdrawal behavior: conservation of resource perspective. Front Psychol 13:887352
Khaliq A, Noy I (2007) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: empirical evidence from sectoral data in Indonesia. J Econ Lit 45(1):313–325
Khan MA, Ozturk I (2020) Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(7):7244–7255
Khan MA, Khan MZ, Zaman K, Irfan D, Khatab H (2014) RETRACTED: questing the three key growth determinants: energy consumption, foreign direct investment and financial development in South Asia. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Khan AG, Hossain MA, Chen S (2021) Do financial development, trade openness, economic development, and energy consumption affect carbon emissions for an emerging country? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(31):42150–42160 1-11
Kim HS, Baek J (2011) The environmental consequences of economic growth revisited. Econ Bul 31(2):1–13
Kuhndt M, von Geibler J, Herrndorf M (2006) Assessing the ICT sector contribution to the millennium development goals: status quo analysis of sustainability information for the ICT sector. Wuppertal Report, Deutschland
Lee S-O, Hong A, Hwang J (2017) ICT diffusion as a determinant of human progress. Inf Technol Dev 23(4):687–705
Li S, Yu Y, Jahanger A, Usman M, Ning Y (2022) The impact of green investment, technological innovation, and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from MINT countries. Front Environ Sci 2022:156
Liobikienė G, Butkus M (2019) Scale, composition, and technique effects through which the economic growth, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and trade affect greenhouse gas emissions. Renew Energy 132:1310–1322
Liu J, Yuan C, Hafeez M, Yuan Q (2018a) The relationship between environment and logistics performance: evidence from Asian countries. J Clean Prod 204:282–291
Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W, Zhan D, Li J (2018b) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China's cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613:521–529
Makino S, Lau C-M, Yeh R-S (2002) Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. J Int Bus Stud 33(3):403–421
Malik MY, Latif K, Khan Z, Butt HD, Hussain M, Nadeem MA (2020) Symmetric and asymmetric impact of oil price, FDI and economic growth on carbon emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL and non-linear ARDL approach. Sci Total Environ 726:138421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138421
Medina Á, González-Jartín JM, Sainz MJ (2017) Impact of global warming on mycotoxins. Curr Opin Food Sci 18:76–81
Mehmood U (2021) Renewable-nonrenewable energy: institutional quality and environment nexus in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(21):26529–26536
Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ 32(6):1374–1382
Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO 2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(21):21669–21681
Murshed M, Ahmed R, Kumpamool C, Bassim M, Elheddad M (2021) The effects of regional trade integration and renewable energy transition on environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian neighbors. Bus Strateg Environ 30(8):4154–4170
Murshed M, Abbass K, Rashid S (2021a) Modelling renewable energy adoption across south Asian economies: empirical evidence from Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Int J Financ Econ 26(4):5425–5450
Narayan PK, Popp S (2012) The energy consumption-real GDP nexus revisited: empirical evidence from 93 countries. Econ Model 29(2):303–308
Nasir MA, Huynh TLD, Tram HTX (2019) Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: a case of emerging ASEAN. J Environ Mangem 242:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.112
Niu S, Ding Y, Niu Y, Li Y, Luo G (2011) Economic growth, energy conservation and emissions reduction: a comparative analysis based on panel data for 8 Asian-Pacific countries. Energy Policy 39(4):2121–2131
Omri A (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Energy Econ 40:657–664
Palanca-Tan R, Dy TA, Tan A (2016) Relating carbon dioxide emissions with macroeconomic variables in the Philippine setting. Low Carbon Econ 7(1):12–20
Paris Agreement. (2015). Paris agreement. Paper presented at the Report of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (21st Session, 2015: Paris). Retrived December.
Pesaran MH (1997) The role of economic theory in modelling the long run. Econ J 107(440):178–191
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
Polloni-Silva E, Ferraz D, Camioto FD, Rebelatto DA, Moralles HF (2021) Environmental kuznets curve and the pollution-halo/haven hypotheses: an investigation in Brazilian Municipalities. Sustainability 13(8):4114
Qader MR, Khan S, Kamal M, Usman M, Haseeb M (2022) Forecasting carbon emissions due to electricity power generation in Bahrain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(12):17346–17357
Ramzan M, Raza SA, Usman M, Sharma GD, Iqbal HA (2021) Environmental cost of non-renewable energy and economic progress: do ICT and financial development mitigate some burden? J Clean Prod 333:130066
Ramzan M, Iqbal HA, Usman M, Ozturk I (2022) Environmental pollution and agricultural productivity in Pakistan: new insights from ARDL and wavelet coherence approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(19):28749–28768
Rao DT, Sethi N, Dash DP, Bhujabal P (2020) Foreign aid, FDI and economic growth in South-East Asia and South Asia. Glob Bus Rev 2020:0972150919890957
Richmond AK, Kaufmann RK (2006) Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? Ecol Econ 56(2):176–189
Sadiq M, Shinwari R, Usman M, Ozturk I, Maghyereh AI (2022). Linking nuclear energy, human development and carbon emission in BRICS region: do external debt and financial globalization protect the environment?. Nucl Eng Technol
Salahuddin M, Alam K (2016) Information and communication technology, electricity consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: a panel data analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 76:185–193
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2002–2010
Salam S, Hafeez M, Mahmood MT, Akbar K (2019) The dynamic relation between technology adoption, technology innovation, human capital and economy: comparison of lower-middle-income countries. Interdisciplinary description of complex systems. INDECS 17(1-B):146–161
Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:347–356
Sesric, O. (2018). Economic Outlook 2018. Ankara
Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287
Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232
Shi Y, Bilal M, Ho HC, Omar A (2020) Urbanization and regional air pollution across South Asian developing countries–a nationwide land use regression for ambient PM2. 5 assessment in Pakistan. Environ Pollut 266:115145
Siddique HMA, Majeed DMT, Ahmad DHK (2020) The impact of urbanization and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in South Asia. South Asian Stud 31(2)
Soytas U, Sari R (2009) Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecol Econ 68(6):1667–1675
Tahir T, Luni T, Majeed MT, Zafar A (2021) The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8088–8101
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454
Uddin GS, Sjö B, Shahbaz M (2013) The causal nexus between financial development and economic growth in Kenya. Econ Model 35:701–707
Usman M, Hammar N (2021) Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(12):15519–15536
Usman M, Makhdum MSA (2021) What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renew Energy 179:12–28
Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Energy Policy 162:112780
Usman M, Radulescu M (2022) Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Sci Total Environ 841:156662
Usman M, Kousar R, Makhdum MSA (2020a) The role of financial development, tourism, and energy utilization in environmental deficit: evidence from 20 highest emitting economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(34):42980–42995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10197-1
Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R (2020b) Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustain Cities Soc 65:102590
Usman M, Khalid K, Mehdi MA (2021a) What determines environmental deficit in Asia? Embossing the role of renewable and non-renewable energy utilization. Renew Energy 168:1165–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.012
Usman M, Anwar S, Yaseen MR, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R, Jahanger A (2021b) Unveiling the dynamic relationship between agriculture value addition, energy utilization, tourism and environmental degradation in South Asia. J Public Aff 2021:e2712
Usman M, Jahanger A, Makhdum MSA, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Bashir A (2022a) How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries' economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation. Energy 241:122515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122515
Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Jahanger A, Ahmad P (2022b) Pollution concern during globalization mode in financially resource-rich countries: do financial development, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption matter? Renew Energy 183:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.067
Usman M, Jahanger A, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022c) Do nuclear energy, renewable energy, and environmental-related technologies asymmetrically reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from Pakistan. Energies 15(9):3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093448
Wan X, Jahanger A, Usman M, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Yu Y (2022) Exploring the effects of economic complexity and the transition to a clean energy pattern on ecological footprint from the Indian perspective. Front Environ Sci 9:736
Wang X, Luo Y (2020) Has technological innovation capability addressed environmental pollution from the dual perspective of FDI quantity and quality? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 258:120941
Wang S, Shi C, Fang C, Feng K (2019) Examining the spatial variations of determinants of energy-related CO2 emissions in China at the city level using Geographically Weighted Regression Model. Appl Energy 235:95–105
World Bank. (2021). World Bank Statistics. from https://data.worldbank.org/
Wu W, Yuan L, Wang X, Cao X, Zhou S (2020) Does FDI drive economic growth? Evidence from city data in China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 56(11):2594–2607
Yang B, Usman M (2021) Do industrialization, economic growth and globalization processes influence the ecological footprint and healthcare expenditures? Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for countries with the highest healthcare expenditures. Sustain Prod Consump 28:893–910
Yang B, Jahanger A, Usman M, Khan MA (2021) The dynamic linkage between globalization, financial development, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability in GCC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(13):16568–16588
Yao X, Yasmeen R, Li Y, Hafeez M, Padda IUH (2019) Free trade agreements and environment for sustainable development: a gravity model analysis. Sustainability 11(3):597
Yasmeen R, Li Y, Hafeez M (2019) Tracing the trade–pollution nexus in global value chains: evidence from air pollution indicators. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(5):5221–5233
Yu H-Y, Zhu S-L (2015) Toward Paris: China and climate change negotiations. Adv Clim Chang Res 6(1):56–66
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428
Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543
Zhang Y-J, Bian X-J, Tan W, Song J (2017) The indirect energy consumption and CO2 emission caused by household consumption in China: an analysis based on the input–output method. J Clean Prod 163:69–83
Zhang K, Yao L, Meng J, Tao J (2018a) Maxent modeling for predicting the potential geographical distribution of two peony species under climate change. Sci Total Environ 634:1326–1334
Zhang Y-J, Bian X-J, Tan W (2018b) The linkages of sectoral carbon dioxide emission caused by household consumption in China: evidence from the hypothetical extraction method. Empir Econ 54(4):1743–1775
Zhou X, Zhang J, Li J (2013) Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy 57:43–51
Zivot E, Andrews DWK (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 20(1):25–44
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Huaming Song, School of Economics and Management, Dr. Zulqarnain, for their assistance with the guidelines and Dr. Farina for his comments that significantly helped us improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Kashif Abbass: conceptualization, introduction, methodology, interpreted results, writing-original draft preparation. Huaming Song: visualization, validation, conclusion, writing-original draft preparation. Zulqarnain Mustaq: conceptualization, formal analysis, project administration, supervision, finalizes manuscript and review and editing. Farina Khan: literature review, formal analysis, and review and editing. Kashif Abbass: writing-original draft preparation, review and editing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval and informed consent are not applicable for this study.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication is not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abbass, K., Song, H., Mushtaq, Z. et al. Does technology innovation matter for environmental pollution? Testing the pollution halo/haven hypothesis for Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 89753–89771 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21929-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21929-w