Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental treaties’ impact on the environment in resource-rich and non-resource-rich countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of environmental treaties on the environment across 74 countries: 50 resource-rich and 24 non-resource-rich countries. Using data spanning over 35 years, we find a negative and significant association between environmental treaties and environmental quality in resource-rich countries. On the contrary, we find environmental treaties positively and significantly affect the environment in non-resource-rich countries. Our results suggest that the environmental treaties signed by resource-rich countries may lead them to achieve sustainable development growth by 2030. Therefore, our results extend the environment literature and inform policymakers of the need to pay attention to the effects of signing environmental treaties on environmental protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adedoyin FF, Bekun FV (2020) Modelling the interaction between tourism, energy consumption, pollutant emissions, and urbanization: renewed evidence from panel VAR. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:38881–38900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09869-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adedoyin FF, Bekun FV, Driha OM, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2020) The effects of air transportation, energy, ICT and FDI on economic growth in the industry 4.0 era: Evidence from the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 160:120297

  • Alam MJ, Begum IA, Buysse J, Rahman S, Van Huylenbroeck G (2011) Dynamic modeling of causal relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3243–3251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam M, Mahmudul Alam M, Haroon Hafeez M (2018) Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. J Clean Prod 190:330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2014) Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases), and economic growth: evidence from a panel of E.U. (European Union) countries. Energy 74:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauch HG, Oswald U (2009) Junee. Securitizing the ground, grounding security. Secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Bonn:Germany

  • Chaabouni S, Zghidi N, Mbarek MB (2016) On the causal dynamics between CO2 emissions, health expenditures, and economic growth. Sustain Cities Soc 22:184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Gozgor G, Koo CK, Lau CKM (2020) Does international cooperation affect CO 2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(8):8548–8556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy 138:111192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA (2020) Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(27):33601–33614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94(2016):429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engo J (2019) Decomposition of Cameroon’s CO 2 emissions from 2007 to 2014: an extended Kaya identity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(16):16695–16707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gozgor G (2017) Does trade matter for carbon emissions in OECD countries? Evidence from a new trade openness measure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(36):27813–27821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0361-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AR (2015) Econometricians have their moments: GMM at 32. Economic Record 91(S1):1–24

  • Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of Generalized Method of Moments estimators. Econometrica 50:1029–1054

  • Hao Y, Deng Y, Lu ZN, Chen H (2018) Is environmental regulation effective in China? Evidence from city-level panel data. J Clean Prod 188:966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Chen X, Zhu H, Huang C, Tian Z (2019) The heterogeneous effects of FDI and foreign trade on CO2 emissions: evidence from China. Math Probl Eng 2019:114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, T., & Kim, J. (2018). What is better for mitigating carbon emissions–renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 91(April), 464–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022, What is better for mitigating carbon emissions – Renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis

  • Kanie (2007) Governance with Multi-lateral Environmental Agreements: a healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation? In: Global Environmental (ed) Governance: Perspectives on the Current Debate, edited by Walter Hoffmann and Lydia Swart. Center for UN Reform Education, New York, pp 67–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Le T-H, Chang Y, Park D (2016) Trade openness and environmental quality: international evidence. Energy Policy 92:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Sun H, Du Y, Li Z, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2020a) Environmental regulation for transfer of pollution-intensive industries: evidence from Chinese provinces. Front Energy Res 8:604005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.604005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Sun H, Tran DK, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2020b) The impact of environmental regulation on technological innovation of resource-based industries. Sustainability 12:6837. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Dong H, Huang Z, Failler P (2019) Impact of foreign direct investment on environmental performance. Sustainability 11(13):3538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Benjamin IN (2018, October 1) Causal relationships between energy consumption, foreign direct investment, and economic growth for MINT: evidence from panel dynamic ordinary least square models. J Clean Prod Elsevier Ltd 197:708–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Ren X, Cheng C, Wang Z (2020) The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Sci Total Environ 718:137379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohmand YT, Mehmood F, Mughal KS, Aslam F (2020) Investigating the causal relationship between transport infrastructure, economic growth, and transport emissions in Pakistan. Res Transp Econ 100972

  • Morin JF, Blouin C (2019) How environmental treaties contribute to global health governance. Glob Health 15(1):47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad B, Khan S (2019) Effect of bilateral FDI, energy consumption, CO2 emission, and capital on economic growth of Asia countries. Energy Rep 5:1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38(12):7850–7860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO 2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(3):2699–2709

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Jemaa MMB (2015) On the causal nexus of road transport CO2 emissions and macroeconomic variables in Tunisia: evidence from combined cointegration tests. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:89–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Cao X, Alharthi M, Zhang J, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Mohsin M (2020a) Carbon emission transfer strategies in supply chain with lag time of emission reduction technologies and low-carbon preference of consumers. J Clean Prod 121664

  • Sun L, Qin L, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Zhang J, Mohsin M, Chaudhry IS (2020b) Analyzing carbon emission transfer network structure among provinces in China: new evidence from social network analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23281–23300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08911-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taka GN, Huong TT, Shah IH, Park HS (2020) Determinants of energy-based CO2 emissions in Ethiopia: a decomposition analysis from 1990 to 2017. Sustainability 12(10):4175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawiah V, Zakari A, Khan I (2020) The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement: an analysis of the effect of China–Africa partnership on carbon emissions. Sci Total Environ 143603

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 27 May 2017

  • Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016a) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C (2016b) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 542:360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Zhou, T., Chen, H., & Rong, Z. (1970). Environmental homogenization or heterogenization. The effects of globalization on carbon dioxide emissions, 2014.

  • Waqih MAU, Bhutto NA, Ghumro NH, Kumar S, Salam MA (2019) Rising environmental degradation and impact of foreign direct investment: an empirical evidence from SAARC region. J Environ Manag 243(January):472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang P, Liang X, Drohan PJ (2020) Using Kaya and LMDI models to analyze carbon emissions from the energy consumption in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–7

  • Yang J, Guo H, Liu B, Shi R, Zhang B, Ye W (2018) Environmental regulation and the pollution haven hypothesis: do environmental regulation measures matter? J Clean Prod 202:993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakari A, Tawiah V (2019) Impact of electricity consumption, financial development, trade openness on CO2 emissions: evidence from Nigeria. Econ Stud 28(4)

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Abdulrasheed Zakari; data curation: Festus Fatai Adedoyin; formal analysis: Azadeh Pazouki; methodology: Festus Fatai Adedoyin; validation: Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary; writing—original draft: Abdulrasheed Zakari and Festus Fatai Adedoyin; writing—review and editing: Azadeh Pazouki and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 List of countries included in the sample
Table 8 Schematic literature review map for selected empirical studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zakari, A., Adedoyin, F.F., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. et al. Environmental treaties’ impact on the environment in resource-rich and non-resource-rich countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 33108–33119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12715-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12715-1

Keywords

Navigation