Skip to main content
  • 538 Accesses

Abstract

Although many developing countries have started to incorporate the environmental dimension in their bodies of laws, environmental regulation is conspicuously absent from existing studies of capitalism. The chapter’s author (André Meunié) finds national environmental governance to be differentiated by the effectiveness of local institutions governing natural resources, and by the degrees of private sector involvement, participation in international coalitions and protection of biodiversity. Four models of environmental governance are identified. As for developing countries, the biodiversity-focused type includes countries endowed with exceptional local environmental resources and having adopted “hot spot” preservation schemes while weakly governed countries feature significantly weak overall environmental regulation. Included in the idiosyncratic type is an interesting group of emerging countries, with weak environmental governance and a strong involvement in international regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recent trends of research try to combine ecological economics and political ecology to highlight the influence of social conflicts on environmental governance (see the special issue of Ecological Economics under the direction of Martinez-Alier 2010).

  2. 2.

    Note that these variables do not affect the construction of principal factors. In order to back up PCA results, twenty-five bootstrap replications of the initial sample were implemented in order to provide confidence intervals for the projected variables coordinates. This bootstrap procedure shows that the position of active variables on the first factorial plan is stable, thus confirming the robustness of our PCA results.

  3. 3.

    The so-called relevant partition, i.e., the relevant number of clusters, is derived from the analysis of the dendrogram and the analysis of two indicators that respectively measure (i) the improvement of the inter- to intra-cluster variance ratio from a given partition to another and (ii) the impact of k-means consolidation on that ratio.

  4. 4.

    More specifically, the standardized Euclidian distance between these countries and the barycentre is below half the median distance.

References

  • Aidt, T.S. 2010. Corruption and Sustainable Development. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1061, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderies, J.M. 2011. The Challenge of Understanding Decisions in Experimental Studies of Common Pool Resource Governance. Ecological Economics 70: 1571–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, S. 2007. Key Actors in UN Environmental Governance: Influence, Reform and Leadership. International Environmental Agreements 7 (4): 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty, Richard M. 1993. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., and M. Flinders. 2004. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borghesi, S. 1999. The EKC: A Survey of Literature. FEEM Working Paper 85-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damania, R., P.G. Fredriksson, and J.A. List. 2003. Trade Liberalization, Corruption, and Environmental Policy Formation: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46: 490–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESI Report. 2005. Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy and Center for International Earth Science Information Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focaci, A. 2005. Empirical Analysis of the Environmental and Energy Policies in Some Developing Countries Using Widely Employed Macroeconomic Indicators: The Cases of Brazil, China and India. Energy Policy 4 (33): 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H., and E. Lambin. 2002. Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation. Bioscience 52 (2): 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, N., R. Tsutsumi, and K. Watanabe. 2002. Environmental Indicators of Transition. European Environment 12: 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorca, M., and A. Meunié. 2008. SO2 Emissions and Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Case of China. Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies 7 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. 2010. Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Valuation Languages. Ecological Economics 70 (2): 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlum, H., K. Moene, and R. Torvik. 2006. Institutions and the Resource Curse. Economic Journal 116 (508): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe, M. 1995. Is Environmental Degradation an Inevitable Consequence of Economic Growth: Tunneling through the EKC. Ecological Economics 29: 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, J.A.P. 2002. Implementing Environmental Policies in Developing Countries through Decentralization: The Case of Protected Areas in Bahia, Brazil. World Development 30 (10): 1713–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, J. 2007. Institutions and Environmental Governance: A Reconceptualization. Ecological Economics 63: 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa, M., and N.W. Gleason. 2012. Major Emerging Powers in Sustainable Development Diplomacy: Assessing Their Leadership Potential. Global Environmental Change 22: 915–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.A., R. Torvik, and T. Verdier. 2006. Political Foundations of the Resource Curse. Journal of Development Economics 79: 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarzyńska, K., and J. van den Bergh. 2010. Evolving Power and Environmental Policy: Explaining Institutional Change with Group Selection. Ecological Economics 69: 743–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, K.R.E. 2010. Conservation and Development: Evidence from Thai Protected Areas. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60: 94–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. 2004. The Rise and Fall of Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development 8 (32): 1419–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. 2009. Cooperative Behaviour and Institutions. The Journal of Socio-Economics 38: 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1992. World Development Report: Development and the Environment. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 10.5 List of the variables used
Table 10.6 Data summary statistics—mean value (standard deviation)
Table 10.7 Simple correlations between WCI variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meunié, A. (2017). Environmental Regulation Models. In: Rougier, E., Combarnous, F. (eds) The Diversity of Emerging Capitalisms in Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49947-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49947-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49947-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics