Abstract
In this study, effects of ultrasound pretreatment on combustion characteristics and elemental composition of municipal sludge were examined for energy-based evaluation of sludge pretreatment. Waste activated sludge (WAS) from a municipal wastewater treatment plant was pretreated with ultrasound at varying durations and was subjected to anaerobic digestion in a biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay. Changes in gas production rates, calorific value (CV), elemental compositions, and ash contents of sludge samples were examined to assess the effects of pretreatment and digestion. Sonication at 0.73 W/mL enhanced gas production by 28%. Moreover, volatile solids (VS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals increased from 41 to 45% and 33 to 37%, respectively. Following anaerobic digestion, CVs of samples decreased by about 18%. Sonicated samples exhibited a higher decrease. In order to quantify the change in overall energy content, total solids (TS) reduction was also taken into account. Loss was magnified as both CV and the amount of TS that would provide the overall energy were reduced. This loss was 38% for the control group and 41% for the 15 min sonicated sludge. Digestion decreased the C content of sludge by about 20% and H content by 50% due to biogas production. Ash content increased relatively as some of the combustible solids were lost due to digestion. Experimental results indicate that if sludge is to be combusted, digestion with or without ultrasound pretreatment may be disadvantageous if the aim is to maximize energy gain from sludge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, van Lier J (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59:927–934. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040
APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC
Apul OG, Sanin FD (2010) Ultrasonic pretreatment and subsequent anaerobic digestion under different operational conditions. Bioresour Technol 101:8984–8992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.128
Arun C, Sivashanmugam P (2018) Enhanced production of biohydrogen from dairy waste activated sludge pre-treated using multi hydrolytic garbage enzyme complex and ultrasound-optimization. Energy Convers Manag 164:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.095
ASKI (2014) Official Website of Ankara Metropolitan Municipality, General Directorate of Water and Sewage Administration. https://www.aski.gov.tr/en/. Accessed 23 Mar 2019
ASTM (2012) D3174-12, standard test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke from coal. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
Badmus KO, Tijani JO, Massima E, Petrik L (2018) Treatment of persistent organic pollutants in wastewater using hydrodynamic cavitation in synergy with advanced oxidation process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:7299–7314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1171-z
Bianchini A, Bonfiglioli L, Pellegrini M, Saccani C (2016) Sewage sludge management in Europe: a critical analysis of data quality. Int J Environ Waste Manag 18:226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2016.080795
Boran J, Houdkova L, Ucekaj V, Stehlik P (2008) Utilization of energy from thermal treatment of sludge. Manag Environ Qual An Int J 19:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830810878623
Braguglia CM, Gianico A, Mininni G (2011) Laboratory-scale ultrasound pre-treated digestion of sludge: heat and energy balance. Bioresour Technol 102:7567–7573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.025
Braguglia CM, Gagliano MC, Rossetti S (2012a) High frequency ultrasound pretreatment for sludge anaerobic digestion: effect on floc structure and microbial population. Bioresour Technol 110:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.074
Braguglia CM, Gianico A, Mininni G (2012b) Comparison between ozone and ultrasound disintegration on sludge anaerobic digestion. J Environ Manag 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.030
Cano R, Pérez-Elvira SI, Fdz-Polanco F (2015) Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: a review. Appl Energy 149:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.132
Casajus C, Abrego J, Marias F et al (2009) Product distribution and kinetic scheme for the fixed bed thermal decomposition of sewage sludge. Chem Eng J 145:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.033
Collivignarelli MC, Abbà A, Carnevale Miino M, Torretta V (2019) What advanced treatments can be used to minimize the production of sewage sludge in WWTPs? Appl Sci 9:2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132650
Donatello S, Cheeseman CR (2013) Recycling and recovery routes for incinerated sewage sludge ash (ISSA): a review. Waste Manag 33:2328–2340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.024
Foladori P, Tamburini S, Bruni L (2010) Bacteria permeabilisation and disruption caused by sludge reduction technologies evaluated by flow cytometry. Water Res 44:4888–4899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.030
Gherghel A, Teodosiu C, De Gisi S (2019) A review on wastewater sludge valorisation and its challenges in the context of circular economy. J Clean Prod 228:244–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.240
Hao Z, Yang B, Jahng D (2018) Combustion characteristics of biodried sewage sludge. Waste Manag 72:296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.008
Houtmeyers S, Degrève J, Willems K, Dewil R, Appels L (2014) Comparing the influence of low power ultrasonic and microwave pre-treatments on the solubilisation and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 171:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.029
Jirka AM, Carter MJ (1975) Micro semi-automated analysis of surface and wastewaters for chemical oxygen demand. Anal Chem 47:1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60358a004
Kelessidis A, Stasinakis AS (2012) Comparative study of the methods used for treatment and final disposal of sewage sludge in European countries. Waste Manag 32:1186–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.012
Köksoy GT, Sanin FD (2010) Effect of digester F/M ratio on gas production and sludge minimization of ultrasonically treated sludge. Water Sci Technol 62:1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.447
Kurt M, Aksoy A, Sanin FD (2015) Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.043
Liu S, Yang G, Fu J, Zhang G (2018) Synchronously enhancing biogas production, sludge reduction, biogas desulfurization, and digestate treatment in sludge anaerobic digestion by adding K 2 FeO 4. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:35154–35163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3438-4
Lizama AC, Figueiras CC, Herrera RR et al (2017) Effects of ultrasonic pretreatment on the solubilization and kinetic study of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 123:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.05.020
Magdziarz A, Wilk M (2013) Thermogravimetric study of biomass, sewage sludge and coal combustion. Energy Convers Manag 75:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.016
Onaka T (2000) Sewage can make Portland cement: a new technology for ultimate reuse of sewage sludge. Water Sci Technol 41:93–98
Paulista LO, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP et al (2019) Enhancing methane yield from crude glycerol anaerobic digestion by coupling with ultrasound or A. niger/E. coli biodegradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06748-w
Pérez-Elvira SI, Nieto Diez P, Fdz-Polanco F (2006) Sludge minimisation technologies. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 5:375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-005-5728-9
Pérez-Elvira SI, Ferreira LC, Donoso-Bravo A et al (2010) Full-stream and part-stream ultrasound treatment effect on sludge anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 61:1363–1372. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.893
Riau V, De la Rubia MA, Pérez M (2015) Upgrading the temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by ultrasonic pretreatment. Chem Eng J 259:672–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.032
Seng B, Khanal SK, Visvanathan C (2010) Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge pretreated by a combined ultrasound and chemical process. Environ Technol 31:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330903453236
Show KY, Mao T, Tay JH, Lee DJ (2006) Effects of ultrasound pretreatment of sludge on anaerobic digestion. J Residuals Sci Technol 3:51–59
Thipkhunthod P, Meeyoo V, Rangsunvigit P et al (2005) Predicting the heating value of sewage sludges in Thailand from proximate and ultimate analyses. Fuel 84:849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.01.003
Tian X, Wang C, Trzcinski AP et al (2015) Interpreting the synergistic effect in combined ultrasonication–ozonation sewage sludge pre-treatment. Chemosphere 140:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.007
Tiehm A, Nickel K, Zellhorn M, Neis U (2001) Ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration for improving anaerobic stabilization. Water Res 35:2003–2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00468-1
WEF, ASCE/EWRI (2009) Design of municipal wastewater treatment plants, volume 3: solids processing and management. WEF Press, Virginia
Werther J, Ogada T (1999) Sewage sludge combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 25:55–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(98)00020-3
Zhen G, Lu X, Kato H et al (2017) Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:559–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187
Zheng Y, Cheng C, Zhou Z et al (2019) Insight into the roles of packing carriers and ultrasonication in anaerobic side-stream reactor coupled membrane bioreactors: sludge reduction performance and mechanism. Water Res 155:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.039
Funding
This work was supported by the Middle East Technical University’s Scientific Research Projects Unit (project number: BAP-03-11-2014-001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Ta Yeong Wu
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Çelebi, E.B., Aksoy, A. & Sanin, F.D. Effects of anaerobic digestion enhanced by ultrasound pretreatment on the fuel properties of municipal sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 17350–17358 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08230-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08230-4